For those still having this problem, please file a NEW BUG against xorg-
server on it. Include both your /var/log/Xorg.0.log, and the output of
`sudo get-edid | parse-edid` (you'll need to install the read-edid
package for this).
The problem here is that there is a _hardware_ bug in the monitor
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
Problem remains with Intrepid Alpha 4.
$ xdpyinfo
...
screen #0:
dimensions:1280x800 pixels (289x21 millimeters)
resolution:112x968 dots per inch
...
xorg.0.log attached.
furthermore I was unable to use the stand-alone installer due to huge
(say about 10 times normal size) windows.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151311
You received this bug notification because you
I cannot see this problem anymore with Intrepid Alpha 4, on a system
with Intel i915 (-intel driver). I believe that this bug, with respect
to the -intel driver, has been fixed.
* xdpyinfo reports:
screen #0:
dimensions:1280x800 pixels (330x210 millimeters)
resolution:99x97 dots per
I still have the same problem with Intrepid (my screen says it's 2.1 cm
tall instead of 21 cm)
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16850822/Xorg.0.log
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
I see this is also filed against -ati but the upstream bugs indicate
it's fixed - is anyone with ATI hardware still experiencing this problem
on 8.04.1? If so, please also check if it's still a problem with
Intrepid.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed =
Closing Gutsy tasks since we won't be SRUing to it.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: In Progress = Invalid
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151311
You received this bug
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Hardy)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Bryce Harrington (bryceharrington)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Hardy)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size
Opening again since it still seems to be an issue in current Hardy (Bug
147081) at least with a Compaq nx7400.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Confirmed
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Debian)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151311
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I can reproduce it when booting from a Hardy live CD, too (which is not
surprising).
/etc/X11/xorg.conf is the same (except few differences in the InputDevice
sections). The (attached) Xorg.0.log is quite the same, too.
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log
I can still see this issue on my machine (Intel i915, reported screen size
289x21 mm), although it shows up only in GDM.
I am running an up-to-date Hardy installation.
* xdpyinfo reports:
screen #0:
dimensions:1280x800 pixels (289x21 millimeters)
resolution:112x968 dots per inch
*
I hope this isn't annoying my four posts in a row... but I like to think
I'm hopefully giving helpful beneficial information.
The crashing of gnome-settings-daemon appears to be that other bug I
referenced above and after implementing the workaround I have the intel
driver working (after a whole
Hi Jimmygoon,
Which is the model of your card? it may be helpful for other people that
are trying to install Hardy.
As stated previously some monitors report a buggy EDID, in order to fix
for you monitor it wil be helpful to provide your /var/log/Xorg.0.log
file?
If the intel driver is too slow
Sorry, I admit I was a bit frustrated earlier and was a tad unwilling to
spend much more time with this bug, but today I'm more geared up.
I've attachment my Xorg.0.log. This is basically a result what ubuntu
sets up EXCEPT for when I specify the 'i810' driver (like I've stated
ubuntu defaults to
(attached is the xorg.0.log file for all of my above described changes)
edid/display size + lvds
** Attachment added: intel_edid+lvds_fixes-xorg.0.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12698240/intel_edid%2Blvds_fixes-xorg.0.log
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel
Attached are the Xorg.0.logs for
1st - using the 'intel' driver with no adjustments
2nd - using the 'intel' driver plus doing the following: (this log is included
in the next post... only one attachment at a time)
* Setting DisplaySize for my Monitor
* Adding the Option Monitor-LVDS Configured
Despite what the comments here imply.
My intel driver is very much ignoring Option DisplaySize still and is making
the fonts far too large. I am completely up to date with my Hardy upgrades.
Thanks.
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
To give some more information:
I got it working with the correct DisplaySize and I seemed to have gotten it to
where the dpi was correct but good god was it slow. I've never seen firefox
render anything quite so slowly or a simple picture to load. I was watching it
as it scanned from top to
Hi there,
I still have the same problem with Hardy Alpha 5 and the latest updates.
Find my Xorg.0.log attached.
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12434491/Xorg.0.log
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
Released in yesterday's upload of -intel.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151311
You received this bug
Thanks for doing all the legwork on this one Paul. The patch looks good
and builds properly. I've committed it to Ubuntu's xorg-server git tree
for upload.
Also thanks for flagging related issues *not* solved by this patch; I've
assigned them to myself and will take a look when I get a chance.
289mm x 21mm
Jacques, could you attached /var/log/Xorg.0.log file, please?
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151311
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your help. Find my Xorg.0.log attached...
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11425968/Xorg.0.log.txt
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151311
You
The quirk patch was committed to the upstream git head (to become 1.5)
but might not be in the 1.4 branch that Hardy is tracking. Only selected
fixes from the git head (master) are ported to the 1.4 branch, see
http://wiki.x.org/wiki/Server14Branch
Just correcting the links from my earlier post:
Jacues have (II) intel(0): EDID vendor LPL, prod id 0 in Xorg.0.log for
following version:
Build Operating System: Linux Ubuntu (xorg-server 2:1.4.1~git20080105-1ubuntu1)
Current Operating System: Linux jack-laptop 2.6.24-4-generic #1 SMP Mon Jan 14
17:30:39 UTC 2008 i686
Build Date: 08 January
Jacques-Louis KREISS,
At the command line, please run:
$ xrandr
Please paste the output here.
(I tried Hardy Alpha 3 very briefly, and the login screen resolution was
not overly large as it was with Gusty. Unfortunately, I did not check
to see if the login screen resolution was
@ PJSingh5000
Here is the output of xrandr:
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 800, maximum 1280 x 1280
VGA disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
LVDS connected 1280x800+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 289mm x
21mm
1280x800 60.1*+ 60.0
1280x768
@ Jacques-Louis KREISS :
you must right set your Xorg.conf :
Add the following line to the Device section of xorg.conf:
Option Monitor-LVDS Monitor Identifier
Then add the following line to the Monitor section of xorg.conf:
DisplaySize WIDTH in mm HEIGHT in mm
Replace the ... with
I have the same problem with a fresh install of Kubuntu Hardy Alpha 3.
My computer is a Fujitsu laptop with i945GM video.
kdm shows very very big fonts at login. After logging, the rest of kde
looks OK.
I tried adding a DisplaySize line in xorg.conf, without success.
** Attachment added:
PJSingh5000, this previous comment seems to be an other bug to me.
I suggest you open a new bug and that you copy the bug number here in a new
comment.
Please note that xrandr have an ---output parameter. (man xrandr)
I am quite lost as the status of this bug.
upstream bug 10304 is resolved,
Paul,
Thanks for your suggestion. Perhaps I will try Alpha 3.
Thanks,
PJ Singh
On Jan 10, 2008 12:52 PM, Paul Dufresne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJSingh5000, this previous comment seems to be an other bug to me.
I suggest you open a new bug and that you copy the bug number here in a
new
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #445236
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=445236
** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=445236
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
DDC report some ridiculous
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Debian)
Status: Unknown = Confirmed
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151311
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Tags added: common
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151311
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151311
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the
** Changed in: xorg-server
Status: Unknown = Fix Released
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151311
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact
The line
Option Monitor-LVDS Monitor Identifier
belongs to the Device section. I guess it will work anyway ATM, but it doesn't
look logical when it's somewhere else.
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
Thanks for the clarification, Tormod's.
Add the following line to the Device section of xorg.conf:
Option Monitor-LVDS Monitor Identifier
Then add the following line to the Monitor section of xorg.conf:
DisplaySize WIDTH in mm HEIGHT in mm
Replace the ... with your own values.
Here is
I think The X Resize and Rotate Extension (RandR) is getting confused
between multiple monitors, when the chipset is dual-head capable, and
multiple monitors are not present. Here is an xorg.conf solution/work-
around that is working very well for me so far. This also fixes the
font size and
Anespor's suggestion works well. Add the following two lines to the
Monitor section of xorg.conf:
DisplaySize WIDTH in mm HEIGHT in mm
Option Monitor-LVDS Monitor Identifier
# Replace the ... with your own values
Here is the full Monitor section from my
I am affected by this bug too, with an Intel 915GM on a Toshiba laptop.
Here is my Xorg.0.log, collected on a Gutsy installation.
It looks like the model is the same which has been already reported above, but
I am attaching this just in case. Currently I am using the -dpi option as a
workaround.
Just to sum up the status of some bug fixes which have been mentioned:
http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=xorg/xserver.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc092334ac0a323b80a9602cb8bf60ca9dee3bfa
This commit adds quirks for some monitor models, so that the probed EDID info
will be corrected. It will be included in
Hello guys!
First sorry of my bad english.
This problem is fixed in the Xorg xserver 1.4.1 (comming soon).
- Option DDC Off is really not solution
- Displaysize is first part of solution.
Complet solution of this problem is:
xorg-server 1.4.1 + Xrandr 1.2.2+ (and maybe new xf86-video-intel
Anespor, could you attach your /var/log/Xorg.0.log file?
The fact that you have to edit your /etc/X11/xorg.conf file suggest to me that
you don't have a model:0 of LPL.
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
Hi, i send Xorg.0.log.
You need edit xorg.conf and patch for xserver 1.4 ( i have patch on my
xorg-xserver ). Archlinux's xorg-server it has not.
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10543603/Xorg.0.log
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on
Expanding information for not covered people:
servaas-xubuntu-user, bug #127827, (II) intel(0): Manufacturer: LPL Model: 2a00
Serial#: 0 (near miss!)
(II) intel(0): Setting screen physical size to 289 x 21 (Height divided by 10)
servaas-xubuntu-user (Problem in XUbuntu in general, not just GDM)
No exactly the same but close LGPhilipsLCD LP154W01-TLA2, please for
more details see attachment with EDID output.
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10514070/Xorg.0.log
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
Actually, the current patch looks for:
DDC-vendor.name, LPL and
DDC-vendor.prod_id == 0
xhantt, your log gives (II) intel(0): Manufacturer: LPL Model: 0 Serial#: 0
so it should be covered (supposing Model is the same as prod_id).
I would have to check others people Xorg.log files to see if they
Covered:
Maciej,bug #107320, (II) intel(0): EDID vendor LPL, prod id 0
gutocarvalho,bug #107320,(II) intel(0): Manufacturer: LPL Model: 0 Serial#: 0
Paresh ,bug #107320,(II) intel(0): Manufacturer: LPL Model: 0 Serial#: 0
Not covered:
servaas-xubuntu-user, bug #127827, (II) intel(0):
Sorry, missed this bug. :-)
Not covered:
davmor, bug #151311, (II) intel(0): Manufacturer: LPL Model: 2a00 Serial#: 0
(near miss)
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151311
You received this bug
** Summary changed:
- DPI in kubuntu incorrect on xorg-video-driver-intel
+ DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel
+
+ [Paul: This size 289x21 millimiters is reported by
First, this bug seems to have been 'Fix commited' (they call this Resolved) in
X.org project, according to:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10304
Second, according to puccha, Option DDC no, resolve also the following
problems:
mythtv (video and live tv where squized)
compiz-fusion
Well, as I understand here, the heart of the problem is:
The problem is not caused by the driver, but by bad EDID data from the panel.
Bytes 66-67 (image size in mm) are simply copied over from bytes 21-22 (panel
size in cm) which is obviously incorrect. according to:
Eh... reading again, I come to the conclusion that bug #10304 is fixing only
for the following monitor model:
/* Bug #10304: LGPhilipsLCD LP154W01-A5 */ as I can read by reading the patch:
56 matches
Mail list logo
