[Bug 1588021] Re: Wrong app page in Store [Ubuntu Phone]

2017-03-29 Thread Jamie Strandboge
** Also affects: software-center-agent Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: click-reviewers-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1588021] Re: Wrong app page in Store [Ubuntu Phone]

2016-08-05 Thread James Tait
I'm not convinced anything needs to change in the review tools. The package name is valid for a click package, but invalid for the store - at most this maybe could be flagged as a warning. On the SCA side, I think we just need extra validation in the ClickPackageAnalyzeScanForm. -- You

[Bug 1588021] Re: Wrong app page in Store [Ubuntu Phone]

2016-08-02 Thread Jamie Strandboge
** Changed in: click-reviewers-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588021 Title: Wrong app page in Store [Ubuntu Phone] To manage

[Bug 1588021] Re: Wrong app page in Store [Ubuntu Phone]

2016-08-02 Thread Jamie Strandboge
I'll mark this as confirmed for the review tools but they are going to need store side help to feed the expected name into the tools since the name is valid and it is the store that enforces the publisher be appended with clicks. This should probably be done in the non-review- tools portions of

Re: [Bug 1588021] Re: Wrong app page in Store [Ubuntu Phone]

2016-06-03 Thread costales
Yes, it was that! "name": "tuenti" to "name": "tuenti.gonso" Thanks a lot! -- Sent using Dekko from my Ubuntu device -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588021 Title: Wrong app page in

[Bug 1588021] Re: Wrong app page in Store [Ubuntu Phone]

2016-06-02 Thread Rodney Dawes
The manifest in the click package is wrong. "name": "tuenti", should be "name": "tuenti.gonso", I'm not sure why the server allowed uploading the package. It really should have failed to pass, and complained about this during checks. As a result, when the package is installed and the