[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2010-01-25 Thread casper.labuschagne
Minutes ago I had to kill whatever was slowing me down to a crawl. Scrollkeeper. I don't want this. I don't need this. I don't want my system slowed down by something I don't want / need / use / asked for (and never will either)! I don't need to use a distro containing loads of crap added on

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2010-01-25 Thread Martin Emrich
@casper: What Ubuntu version do you use? There is no scrollkeeper at all in Ubuntu 9.10, I don't assume it will return in the future. -- Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2009-12-02 Thread chris_c
regardless of behavior indexing is not *essential* to for instance gedit etc you could be on a small (2gb) SSD and not have the room for index's and not want the media thrashed package dependencies should not be used to enforce system design but only when packages will absolutely not function

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2009-12-02 Thread Erik B. Andersen
** Description changed: Binary package hint: scrollkeeper In order to remove scrollkeeper I am informed by apt-get that the following must also be removed: - alacarte apturl bug-buddy capplets-data doc-base fast-user-switch-applet - gedit gnome-app-install gnome-applets

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2009-11-29 Thread Tormod Volden
See also bug 363695 for similar issues with xapian. -- Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2009-11-29 Thread Martin Emrich
On my karmic system, I could not find any cronjobs or large databases related to librarian, so I do not consider it a problem. Scrollkeeper ate my CPU once a week, but librarian/rarian-compat is well-behaved in that matter so far. -- Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2009-11-28 Thread Martin Emrich
I noticed that gnome-terminal in karmic does not depend on scrollkeeper or anything similar. ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164819 You received this bug notification

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2009-11-28 Thread chris_c
not a fix as rarian is now used which cant be removed for the same reason as scrollkeeper used to be not removable -- Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2009-11-28 Thread helpdeskdan
And you would want to do remove Rarian why? Rarian is not Scrollkeeper, nor does it suffer the ills that Scrollkeeper did. -- Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2009-09-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
scrollkeeper has been removed from the development release of Ubuntu and is not being maintained. Further bug fixing is extremely unlikely. ** Changed in: scrollkeeper (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix -- Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2009-04-20 Thread Robert Ancell
** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Triaged -- Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164819 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2009-03-01 Thread svaens
I also find this a pain. And very annoying that one can't remove it without removing huge parts of gnome. Does anyone know what the status of this is now? Will this package be included in Jaunty? -- Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164819 You

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2009-03-01 Thread Martin Emrich
I just checked on my desktop, and it seems to be not included already in intrepid, nothing in the metapackage ubuntu-desktop depends on it directly or indirectly. I assume it is the same in jaunty. -- Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164819 You

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2008-12-08 Thread helpdeskdan
What about those of us who do not want to upgrade to Intrepid? I replaced scrollkeeper with rarian - not sure what the consequences are going to be - anybody tried it? -- Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164819 You received this bug notification

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2008-11-03 Thread Pedro Fragoso
Thanks, but in Intrepid scrollkeeper is now provided by rarian-compat and no longer installed. Mind testing it on intrepid? ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164819 You

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2008-08-09 Thread Tormod Volden
alistari, you are free to adapt it :) You can edit the dependencies of each package to not include scrollkeeper - maybe your patches will be accepted by the developers even. Or you can edit the scrollkeeper package to not run it by default. Anyway, it seems like almost all packages use the

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2008-08-09 Thread Tormod Volden
I think this is the way to go. Every package that currently depends on scrollkeeper needs an update like this one, basically just remove the Depends on scrollkeeper in debian/control.in. ** Attachment added: gnome-terminal_2.23.6-0ubuntu2.debdiff

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2008-08-09 Thread Tormod Volden
I just heard scrollkeeper is deprecated in intrepid and replaced by rarian. rarian provides a virtual package scrollkeeper and compatibility wrappers for the scrollkeeper commands. Don't know yet if it's better or worse... -- Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2008-08-08 Thread alistairi
Hallo, it's me again. Eight months after I first registered this bug, I see the developers haven't even yet decided on the importance of it. Well to put my half-pennies worth in, I think this is of fundamental importance. Let's look at Stallmans four freedoms: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2008-06-22 Thread Alistair Ireland
Well I upgraded to Hardy, and apart from numerous other problems, there is still this with Scrollkeeper. I didn't try the other fixes shown above yet but did delete the cron jobs from cron.weekly etc. Interestingly, although the weekly cron job is gone, scrollkeeper is still running weekly,

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2008-05-22 Thread antalk
A reasonably nice way to disable: edit /etc/scrollkeeper.conf Change from OMF_DIR=/usr/share/omf to a non-existant path --- OMF_DIR=/usr/share/omf/NONE

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2008-05-22 Thread Martin Emrich
Nice workaround (I edited my config file right away), but the real fix would be to remove the dependency on scrollkeeper for all packages. This is actually what the maintainers of scrollkeeper recommend. From README.Debian: You should NOT depend on scrollkeeper. (At least) these packages

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2008-04-28 Thread Christoph Lechleitner
Better way (still not recommended): sudo dpkg --force-all --remove scrollkeeper --purge -- Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2008-04-28 Thread Christoph Lechleitner
I strongly support this issue. This damn thing just eats resources, energy, ... and the only nice way to disable it is either hacking or removing it's binaries and/or cronjob. -- Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164819 You received this bug

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2008-03-23 Thread L3ttuce
I can confirm this on gutsy as well. Have the exact same as originally posted by Alistair Ireland. -- Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2008-02-03 Thread Tormod Volden
Just FYI, in Hardy Alpha 4 the scrollkeeper-update accumulates 10 minutes of CPU time on my 1GHz system. Die. -- Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug

[Bug 164819] Re: Can't Remove Scrollkeeper without trashing Gnome

2008-01-22 Thread Martin Emrich
I can confirm this on gutsy (and basically any Debian-based distribution I used in the last 5 years), and I can't remember a single time where I used scrollkeeper or its database (I use the help system so seldom that a slower on-demand indexing would suffice). The only effect I see is a cronjob