[Bug 1683937] Re: [MIR] mozjs38

2017-06-01 Thread Didier Roche
Override component to main mozjs38 38.8.0~repack1-0ubuntu1 in artful: universe/libs -> main libmozjs-38-0 38.8.0~repack1-0ubuntu1 in artful amd64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libmozjs-38-0 38.8.0~repack1-0ubuntu1 in artful arm64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libmozjs-38-0

[Bug 1683937] Re: [MIR] mozjs38

2017-05-17 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
MIR approved. ** Changed in: mozjs38 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1683937 Title: [MIR] mozjs38 To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1683937] Re: [MIR] mozjs38

2017-05-12 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
** Changed in: mozjs38 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1683937 Title: [MIR] mozjs38 To manage

[Bug 1683937] Re: [MIR] mozjs38

2017-05-11 Thread Jeremy Bicha
** Description changed: Availability Ubuntu is a bit ahead of Debian here but the mozjs packages are maintained in Debian. I have an ITP filed (#860396) to maintain this with the Debian pkg-gnome team since I don't think anyone else wants the burden of maintaining it.

[Bug 1683937] Re: [MIR] mozjs38

2017-05-11 Thread Emily Ratliff
Security team ack with caveat that we can only agree to best effort security support at this time due to the upstream support model. This caveat is documented in the Security Team FAQ on the wiki. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/FAQ#mozjs We will continue exploring options for the security

[Bug 1683937] Re: [MIR] mozjs38

2017-05-01 Thread Jeremy Bicha
** Description changed: Availability Ubuntu is a bit ahead of Debian here but the mozjs packages are maintained in Debian. I have an ITP filed (#860396) to maintain this with the Debian pkg-gnome team since I don't think anyone else wants the burden of maintaining it.

[Bug 1683937] Re: [MIR] mozjs38

2017-04-27 Thread Jeremy Bicha
** Description changed: Availability Ubuntu is a bit ahead of Debian here but the mozjs packages are maintained in Debian. I have an ITP filed (#860396) to maintain this with the Debian pkg-gnome team since I don't think anyone else wants the burden of maintaining it.

[Bug 1683937] Re: [MIR] mozjs38

2017-04-21 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
This package should get a thorough security review as part of the MIR given its nature of being a Javascript engine. I will do the rest of the MIR review in parallel. ** Changed in: mozjs38 (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-17.05 ** Changed in: mozjs38 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Mathieu

[Bug 1683937] Re: [MIR] mozjs38

2017-04-21 Thread Michael Terry
** Changed in: mozjs38 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1683937 Title: [MIR] mozjs38 To manage

[Bug 1683937] Re: [MIR] mozjs38

2017-04-18 Thread Jeremy Bicha
** Description changed: Availability Ubuntu is a bit ahead of Debian here but the mozjs packages are maintained in Debian. I have an ITP filed (#860396) to maintain this with the Debian pkg-gnome team since I don't think anyone else wants the burden of maintaining it.

[Bug 1683937] Re: [MIR] mozjs38

2017-04-18 Thread Jeremy Bicha
** Description changed: Availability Ubuntu is a bit ahead of Debian here but the mozjs packages are maintained in Debian. I have an ITP filed (#860396) to maintain this with the Debian pkg-gnome team since I don't think anyone else wants the burden of maintaining it.