** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Importance: Unknown => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
Title:
EXA is balls-achingly slow
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Importance: Medium => Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
Title:
EXA is balls-achingly slow
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Importance: Unknown => Medium
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
Just to confirm that:
Option "AccelMethod" "EXA"
Option "ExaNoComposite" "false"
Option "MigrationHeuristic" "greedy"
did the trick for me on Fujitsu-Siemens and i945 chipset.
Athough, I tried only
Option "MigrationHeuristic" "
I had to use the Option "MigrationHeuristic" "greedy" in Jaunty to get
reasonable performance on the intel GM45
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubu
Why is the driver not fixed for the respective chipsets ?
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http
Why is #193318 a dupe of this one? They are not related. #193318
concerns all video cards while this one is ATI-specific. Doesn't anyone
moderate the dupes? How do you remove a dupe?
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because yo
Alan Tam wrote:
> Can any Ubuntu developer explain what does "Fix Released" mean?
I am not an Ubuntu developer but Fix Released means that the appropriate
fix for the bug has been released as part of the latest (usually
development) version of the package in question.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
E
Can any Ubuntu developer explain what does "Fix Released" mean?
Like others, in intrepid, I still need to add "MigrationHeuristic greedy" to
fix EXA making everything slow when compiz is running. So what has been fixed?
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You rec
I'm having the same problem in intrepid.
it has improved with Option "MigrationHeuristic" "greedy"
Option "ExaNoComposite" "false"
Option "ExaOptimizeMigration" "true"
intel batch has done nothing
thinkpad T60
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
Y
I'm experiencing performance problems also with Sabayon, on a Intel
Corporation 82G33/G31, with compiz (but also with ubuntu)...
for the moment the best performances seem to be with the
INTEL_BATCH=1
and this
Section "Device"
Identifier "VESA"
Driver"i810"
#Option "RenderAccel"
Here are the diagnostic files for both cases, EXA and XAA on OpenSUSE 11.0,
using XX.Org X Server 1.5.2, libdrm 2.4.1 and the latest Mesa 7.2 patches.
Regardless of what these files say,
- the overall performance using EXA is still horribly slow on my 865G compared
to XAA
- starting X server and
curley: that's good to hear! i was starting to worry after trying the
2.5 driver version and libdrm version 2.4.1 and getting like 70fps.
fingers crossed that they come up with something soon!
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notificatio
@citizenofnowhere: Benchmarks you can find in the bug report at
freedesktop.org, which I referred to. The glxgears I'll deliver later.
Fortunately, the OpenSUSE's package maintainers are very actively
tracking the problem together with Intel and issuing updates of drivers,
Mesa and Xorg every coupl
Yeah I understand the concept :) The point of the bug report is when its
not working like its supposed to :)
Your suggestion provides a similar boost that greedy does minus some
compositing elements going haywire so yay, but it's still not being
configured properly by default. Your suggestion (and
Apparently "MigrationHeuristic" shouldn't be changed anymore, at least
for Intel users. One settings that may help performance is:
Option "ExaOptimizeMigration" "true"
See "man exa" for more details.
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug noti
Curley: Thanks a lot for your input! I'm glad too see people starting to
pay attentin again... But I'm afraid things are a bit more messed up.
MigrationHeuristic is the ONLY thing preventing my system on my 945gm
from crawling when I use compositing (and i do a lot its part of my
workflow so yes I
The same loss of EXA performance compared to XAA on an Intel 865G I have also
on OpenSUSE 11.0 with kernel 2.6.25.XX. There a quiet longstanding issue on
that at freedesktop.org I reported:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17605
Short summary:
- Don't mess with the MigrationHeuristic
I have also the performance problem in Intrepid with an Intel 865G using
EXA, with XAA acceleration it is much more faster. Scrolling was not
slow, but in Firefox, and in Dolphin tab switching was slow, also
switching to another window was slow and I got graphics corruption
(screenshot attached), a
Actually scratch that, vblank_mode actually makes my performance worse
by about 100fps, consistently with compositing both on or off... that's
odd
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Juan Carlos: thanks for the link! seems to have solved the issue for
some, but i'm still getting much lower fps than I should be on my 945
(350 instead of 900). with compositing on its an abysmal 270... :( no
stranger to getting direct rendering working so i've tried all the
usual.. seems there is
Someone requested me to share this link. Might be relevant:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18128
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubunt
My laptop is lenovo with this vga card using intrepid beta (updated daily)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
tried INTEL_BATCH=1, and some xorg.conf config but no luck
glxgears with compiz on:
2412 frames in 5.0 second
I noticed slow in Intrepid too... intel X3100
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://list
I have given up
I am using a T60 with intrepid with a Intel 945 graphics card
Tried all the options EXA / XAA, intel_batch and nothing seems to improve the
speed
running at 222fps using glxgears
Any suggestions ???
Please help
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
I had this problem and tried to solve it with adding those three lines
of Option to xorg.conf file. However, it did not solve my problem and I
still had very slow scrolling and other performance issues.
I eventually decided to try the new version that is Intrepid so upgraded from
8.04 to 8.10 bet
I can also confirm performance regression after upgrading from 8.04 to
8.10 Beta. glxgears shows 1100fps on Hardy and only 650fps on Intrepid.
It looks like INTEL_BATCH is not supported in Intrepid. I'm using Acer
Aspite One laptop with Intel 945GME GPU
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.
I'm also seeing this on my x3100. I went from 1200 fps in glxgears with
Hardy to 450 in Intrepid.
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
I too have this problem in Intrepid, I'm using an Intel X3100 on a Dell
Studio 15. My glxgears fps is around 600 and I can't run Google Earth
properly. Should this bug be reopened?
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
Odd, running intrepid livecd alpha 6 compiz seems to run faster than hardy
(less CPU, can scroll in firefox without 90% CPU, it is only around 50-60% CPU
and very responsive).
But I had similar experience when running hardy alphas. Compiz would work fine,
then I would get an update causing massi
I've also recently noticed slowness on the x3100 in Intrepid
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
h
The bug seems to be reappeared to me too in Intrepid 64bit up-to-date
with intel x3100.
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
This bug reappeared for me since the migration to the 2.6.27 kernel
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
Following up on my previous post - the "force greedy" patch was disabled
in version 2:2.3.2-2ubuntu2 of the intel driver (although only because
it was causing a segmentation fault). I hope this patch doesn't get re-
introduced, as my Intel 855GM seems pretty snappy using the "always"
MigrationHeuri
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
dsyates, that is correct. Also it looks like upstream will not be
supporting TTM, but instead will focus on GEM. This is particularly
evidenced by yesterday's libdrm release which also omitted TTM. So TTM
looks like a dead end and we won't be pursuing it ourselves. Hopefully
GEM will develop ra
Bryce,
Can I make a request re: 05_intel_exa_force_greedy.patch? Currently this
patch forces the "greedy" heuristic which is currently the best option
for many Intel cards (mine included). However, it effectively disables
EXA acceleration for most cases, as far as I understand.
Wouldn't it be bet
Hi all,
throwing this in as the above suggestions haven't done anything to help my
situation. Firefox performance using certain pages (gmail, slashdot comments)
can safely still be called balls-achingly, if not balls-crunchingly, slow :(
$ lspci | grep VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Inte
Bryce,
Are you saying that there is little to no chance that TTM support (fedora 9
includes this?) will make it into an hardy, before intrepid is released?
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
Hopefully, Intrepid will include TTM.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:49:43AM -, Fabio Povoledo wrote:
>
> "I think it can be safely said that any further slowdowns of video playback
> while compiz (or perhaps another compositive manager which uses indirect glx)
> is running, are because of the
i've found a fix that works for me: Bug#186058
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.u
No, it didn't work.
in the beggining everything looked ok, but after a while everytime i
rotated cube in 3D my laptop crashed. always.
so i launched recovery-mode and let ubuntu setup the X by itself. The xorg.conf
has changed to:
Section "Device", Identifier "Configured Video Device" EndSection
"I think it can be safely said that any further slowdowns of video playback
while compiz (or perhaps another compositive manager which uses indirect glx)
is running, are because of the fact that the video frames are being transferred
over aiglx as textures. Unless the kernel supports something
the fix(add 3 options to xorg.conf and INTEL_... to environment) worked
for me ubuntu hardy heron 8.04 LTS, intel card 945GM, toshiba satellite
a200
thank you
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Lionel, this thread is only related to the intel driver which is used
with the graphics cards listed at
http://intellinuxgraphics.org/documentation.html. I'd run lspci -a, find
out the model of your ATI card, and then do a google search for it and
hardy.
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs
I have the same Firefox scrolling issue here on a PC freshly upgraded to
Hardy. The video card is ATI with fglrx drivers.
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hi,
The status of this bug is "Fix Released". Can anyone point me to the
fix. I'm not able to find it. I'm running Ubuntu Hardy (amd64) ?
TIA
--
Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल http://wahjava.wordpress.com/
·-- ·- ·--- ·- ···- ·- ·--·-· --· -- ·- ·· ·-·· ·-·-·- -·-· --- --
*
I think it can be safely said that any further slowdowns of video
playback while compiz (or perhaps another compositive manager which uses
indirect glx) is running, are because of the fact that the video frames
are being transferred over aiglx as textures. Unless the kernel supports
something like
Hi,
I'm also experiencing similar issue on my Intel D945GNTL motherboard
based desktop. I'm running xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.2.1-1ubuntu12.
I've tried all workarounds mentioned above adding options
"MigrationHeuristics" = "greedy", "AccelMethod" = "EXA",
"ExaNoComposite" = (both "false" and "t
@ jhwilliams
It works for me. But there is still a bug for me when using compiz that causes
Xorg CPU to go to 80%. Even scrolling ubuntu forums or anywheres causes cpu to
go high which makes compiz unusable for me (full screen video is bad as well).
But not many people are posting this problem, s
jhwilliams: on my 965, EXA is on by default with the greedy tweak, video
uses XV with comparable CPU use to prior ubuntu versions. Everything
works as well or better than it did in gutsy, as far as I can tell.
to those having trouble with dual monitors: I'd like to point out that
the 'Screen Reso
"On 965 using 2:2.2.1-1ubuntu6 everything works fine now by default" -
Gabor CZIGOLA. I just ordered a laptop with the 965, and want to confirm
that other people agree with Gabor.
Is 965 working now? And if so, with what CPU utilization on regular 2D,
Compiz/Xv, Google Earth use, and so on? Will H
Regarding problems with intel video cards and vga out, I can point out
bug #137234
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
I am still experiencing this problem.
I run a Dell Latitude D610, with the 915GM graphics card.
Hardy Beta with patches up to date (Apr16), including xserver-xorg-video-intel
2:2.2.1-1ubuntu12
I have the INTEL_BATCH=1 variable in /etc/environment
xorg.conf is as clean as after running sudo dpkg-r
I have 945GM and projectM went at around 3 FPS; the other visualizations
work fine.
HTH
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
I have 915GM in Dell Laptop PentiumM 512RAM
With Xorg.conf changes from post #12 above and xserver-xorg from Hardy
repository:
Plant Penguin Racer = 35-40 fps
glxgears= 1450+
Firefox3 no problems
I am still trying to get ProjectM visualization to work in Amarok at
above 2 fps. Works great on my
A day or two ago compiz became slow again for me. Playing any video fullscreen
results in a couple frames per second. Doing anything compiz related with a
video running results in low frames per second. This happened before I updated
to newest kernel.
I added 2gb more of ram (now 3gb) and same p
855GM.
This is not fixed for me. The option increases the usability by a large
factor leading me to believe that it is NOT "fixed" if I still have to
enter it manually to get firefox to scroll without crawling...
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received t
On 965 using 2:2.2.1-1ubuntu6 everything works fine now by default:
- compiz works
- EXA is used ( newer rendering architecture )
- migration heuristic is greedy ( => smooth scolling )
- overlay video is used instead of texture video ( xv works with compiz )
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https:/
Here is my video xorg.conf which has compiz working great. I also have
INTEL_BATCH="1"
Section "device" #
Identifier "device1"
Boardname "Intel 965"
Busid "PCI:0:2:0"
Driver "intel"
Screen 0
Vendorname "Intel"
Then again I could be reading this wrong or there are problems actually
implementing the patch because i needed to add to the configured video
device section of my xorg.conf the three options from above
"AccelMethod""exa", "MigrationHeuristic""greedy", and
"ExaNoComposite""false" in order to enable
INTEL_BATCH="1" will not be added by default for reasons on Bug #195843
I believe the current setup is by default AccelMethod set to EXA with
MigrationHeuristic greedy for all intel chipsets.
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification
mm, the solution is not perfect because now, without using Compiz, I
have strange screen corruption in Xmoto (the game)
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Indeed, adding the INTEL_BATCH="1" was enough to solve most of my
problem. Performances are not perfect but I'm more or less at the Gutsy
level.
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
I don't know. I hope so. As well with all the other stuff mentioned on this
page. I don't want to format/install ubuntu again and have to type in all that
stuff everytime.
If the environment thing does not work (reboot first), please answer my other
questions.
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
htt
I didn't add INTEL_BATCH="1" in /etc/environment. I will try with it.
But will it be automatically added for people upgrading from gutsy ?
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
@Lionel Dricot
What exactly does not work good for you?
Video playback (framerates/fullscreen)? compiz slow?
What are your video card/computer specs?
What is your video driver? Post your xorg.conf
Have you also done the INTEL_BATCH="1" in /etc/environment ?
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https:/
I dist-upgraded today and I saw this changelog but, after a reboot, I
don't see any improvement. Seems that it doesn't work for me.
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
This bug was fixed in the package xserver-xorg-video-intel -
2:2.2.1-1ubuntu6
---
xserver-xorg-video-intel (2:2.2.1-1ubuntu6) hardy; urgency=low
[ Bryce Harrington ]
* debian/patches/05_intel_exa_force_greedy.patch: Another shot at the
greedy patch. This time by slightly modi
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing lis
Thanks everyone for verifying it. We were holding off until after -beta
was out, so it can be uploaded at any time now, and should be up within
the week.
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
Hi Bryce,
good work, I can confirm that 1ubuntu6 recompiled for amd64 works fine (smooth
scrolling in firefox, hibernation works and XV as well; all with clean
xorg.conf, of course). Please, don't hasitate to release. Afterall, it's still
beta.
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launch
I do confirm the INTEL_BATCH="1" works well; boosting me from 900->1200fps.
Good work!
However the:
Option "AccelMethod" "EXA"
Option "ExaNoComposite" "false"
Option "MigrationHeuristic" "greedy"
Do NOT work when I add them to the bottom of my xorg.conf.
I am on an intel 945GM with the i810 drive
I have similar problem as Alfonso Eusebio wrote on 2008-03-19
Now when I movie video player (VLC) or anything related to compiz, the video
player screen goes blue.
This happened a couple days ago.
What is this xv vs x11? Where are these options to change? I don't see it in
xorg.conf I have inte
Perhaps this should be filed in another bug report: xrandr now reports a
maximum resolution of the widest-dimension squared, rather than the
proper one of 2048x2048 (on the 945).
i.e. If my normal resolution is: 1440x900, as it is, then xrandr reports
1440x1440 as the maximum resolution. This is a
Hi,
I am testing the patched xserver-xorg-video-intel_2.2.1-1ubuntu6_i386.deb and
it works well keeping the INTEL_BATCH="1" in /etc/environment.
If I try to disable it, I get corrupted video memory and eventually after some
time a total crash of the system.
I am using a Display controller: Intel
Removed INTEL_BATCH="1" from /etc/environment and finally had a chance
to test XVideo extension video output in VLC on 915 and all seems well
and fine here with xserver-xorg-video-intel_2.2.1-1ubuntu6_i386.deb
$ lspci -nn | grep VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 82915
I installed the package and then did dpkg-reconfigure of xserver-xorg. Noticed
immediate improvement. No INTEL_BATCH necessary.
I'm running a 2nd gen Apple MacBook with intel 945 graphics:
$ lspci | grep -i graphics
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS,
943/940
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS,
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML
Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
Toshiba Satellite A105-S4134
All is fi
xserver-xorg-video-intel_2.2.1-1ubuntu6_i386.deb works nicely with 915
after sudo dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg, INTEL_BATCH="1", and
reboot.
but I did not test xv.
$ lspci -nn | grep VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 82915G/GV/910GL
Integrated Graphics Contr
Alfonso: x11 does a software scaling of the video, xv does it in
hardware. Try an high resolution movie under heavy system load. If it
works with x11, you can definitely use it and forget about xv, if it's
not smooth, probably xv will be smooth instead.
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME,
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
xserver-xorg-video-intel_2.2.1-1ubuntu6_i386.deb works for me as well.
mplayer with xv works but I get the blue screen when I move the window or
rotate the cube.
mplayer
It works for me too. I just install the package, comment the greedy
option, restart gdm and all works great. Thanks !
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
whoops. forgot to mention. As said in a previous post, I have a 945 (my
lspci is attached somewhere above).
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
* installed xserver-xorg-video-intel_2.2.1-1ubuntu6_i386.deb
* reconfigured xorg.conf (dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg)
* rebooted for good measure
It works (compiz nice and smooth, firefox scrolling fast).
Thanks.
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You rece
Alright guys, here is a new cut of the greedy-for-all patch, this time
done as a slight modification of the greedy-for-965 patch. Please
install and test. It should bring the performance benefits that 965
users are reporting to everyone that has EXA enabled, without need for
xorg.conf configurati
I've been having these problems too.
The following configuration has improved my performance:
Option "AccelMethod" "EXA"
Option "ExaNoComposite" "false"
Option "MigrationHeuristic" "greedy"
I also tried the XAA method would made scrolling faster but I could not
get video
Confirmed as well...much better performance. Toshiba Satellite
A105-S4134.
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME,
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
Same chipset as Zakalwe . Of note, running glxgears and moving the
window gives bug similar t
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME,
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
Using
Option "AccelMethod" "EXA"
Option "ExaNoComposite" "false"
Option "MigrationHeuristic" "greedy"
has fixed curre
On 965 this bug seems resolved for me. Accel method is EXA and
MigrationHeuristic is greedy by default. Scolling is smooth.
(The only remainin problem is, that xv is not working if compiz is enabled, see
bug #201596)
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You recei
Not sure it's related, but I noticed that Firefox had suddenly slowed
down. I checked xorg.conf and found that the 'greedy' heuristic and the
other settings had somehow moved from the Device section to the Monitor
section. This may have been caused by using one of the screen
resolution GUIs howev
I'll re-look at the patch after beta. It's probably a silly typo or
inverted logic or something.
I'm dropping the priority down to High since the issues on non-965 chips
aren't nearly as severe as they were on 965.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Importance: Critical => High
Right, sorry that I forgot the other chips. Now the package only works
for i965 just as before, the new one doesn't work yet.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => In Progress
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You recei
allright, I'm lost.
I just upgraded to xserver-xorg-video-intel - 2:2.2.1-1ubuntu4 (latest
updates), did a sudo dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg, rebooted for good
measure, and still the same issue with super slow compiz/firefox scrolling.
I'm with a 945 on a thinkpad T60 (relevant section of
This bug was fixed in the package xserver-xorg-video-intel -
2:2.2.1-1ubuntu4
---
xserver-xorg-video-intel (2:2.2.1-1ubuntu4) hardy; urgency=low
* Revert the greedy change, use the old patch again since the new one
doesn't work right. (LP: #177492)
* Add patches to enable hard
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => New
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-
Like the proposed patch the updated driver still doesn't activate Greedy
for my i915 graphic card without the xorg.conf line.
xserver-xorg-video-intel:
Installed: 2:2.2.1-1ubuntu3
Candidate: 2:2.2.1-1ubuntu3
VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 915GM/GMS/910GML
Express Graphics
I just upgraded to this version. Then I regenerated my xorg.conf with dpkg, and
reboot. So I don't have any option.
Hopelessly scrolling using firefox is slow.
--
EXA is balls-achingly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
