Hi,
Once I tried that command, I got a blank line, and then of course a 0 after
running cat /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr
I then ran winecfg. A segfault resulted again. However, an apport report
was triggered which may shed some more light on the problem.
The new bug report generated by apport is
Could be. Try this (as root):
echo 0 /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
stephenb, 1.0~rc3~winehq0~ubuntu~8.04-1 is not from the Ubuntu repository.
Does 0.9.59-0ubuntu5 crash for you, too? Can you provide an apport report for
it (through a new bug report)? (enable apport in /etc/default/apport, sudo
invoke-rc.d apport restart (to be on the safe side) and then produce
I guess that a lib or something like that is missing. You can easily
recheck it with a liveCD and an internet connection.
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hi Daniel,
Yes, 0.9.59-0ubuntu5 crashes. I listed the versions earlier that I've tried. I
reinstalled 0.9.59-0ubuntu5 and this is when I get when I try to run Notepad,
for example:
wine[15061]: segfault at 4a6c3f68 rip 4a6c3f68 rsp ffe68dfc error 15
Apport doesn't generate anything
stephenb, what is the output of this command:
cat /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Hi Bryan,
$ cat /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr
65536
Is that significant?
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I'd like to confirm that this problem still exist with the new release
of wine, version 1.0~rc3~winehq0~ubuntu~8.04-1
wine[31665]: segfault at 4a6c3f68 rip 4a6c3f68 rsp ff7fd80c error 15
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification
I've had not joy with any version of wine since upgrading to Hardy.
I've tried 0.9.55, 0.9.56, 0.9.59, 0.9.61, and the latest wine update,
1.0-rc2, like all the others, gives me this:
wine[10346]: segfault at 4a6c3f68 rip 4a6c3f68 rsp ffd40ccc error 15
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
Hi,
Too bad the problem still occurs in the final version of Kubuntu Hardy
Heron. At least I have a working workaround for the issue (thanks to
suggestions in this bug report)
I had the exact same kinds of segfaults on the 2 most recent Kubuntu
Hardy Heron kernels and on the last 2 Hardy
Has anyone else experienced this bug on Gutsy with later versions of
Wine (0.9.59)?
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
The Gutsy packages are built with a forced old GCC version. The Hardy
ones currently aren't. This is likely our problem.
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
On Thursday 21 February 2008 13:17:40 rasta_freak wrote:
One more question: why is hardy package for wine distributed in
unstripped form? Did they hope it will work that way or they didn't
build it properly? Difference is ~10 vs ~35 MB in download, and ~50 vs
~100 MB when installed (unpacked).
One more question: why is hardy package for wine distributed in
unstripped form? Did they hope it will work that way or they didn't
build it properly? Difference is ~10 vs ~35 MB in download, and ~50 vs
~100 MB when installed (unpacked). That's a huge diff - 50 MB for
nothing (except debugging).
Installing from
http://wine.budgetdedicated.com/archive/ubuntu/gutsy/wine_0.9.55~winehq0~ubuntu~7.10-1_i386.deb
wine works, but from repository get segmentation fault
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a
If the Gutsy version of wine needs an old gcc, there should be a way to
patch it to use the newer gcc. AFAIK that old gcc is removed in Hardy.
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Scott Richie asked me to comment here:
This is in a feisty vm running on a Windows XP host. I build wine from
git daily, in ~/wine-git/, but use WineHQ's repository to keep a copy of
the current stable release for bug testing (easier than recompiling the
stable each time I want to test it). My
same here
$ winecfg
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ uname -a
Linux clbr 2.6.24-8-generic #1 SMP Thu Feb 14 20:40:45 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux
$ dpkg -l wine
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-f/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/t-aWait/T-pend
|/
@Mikael:
wine 0.9.54 was build using gcc 4.2.2.2 and it worked without any
segfaults.
The only change between 0.9.54 and 0.9.55 was an upload of gcc 4.2.2.3.
there some broken other libs and some changes in build-deps regarding X libs, I
resolved most of them by now, the only lib left is
Absolutely, and debs are available here:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=4390655
It works; good stuff.
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
exporting CC/CXX/CPP to gcc-4.1, g++-4.1, cpp-4.1 (with gcc 4.1.3
installed) from debian/rules and building in pbuilder successfully
causes gcc-4.1 to be invoked, but the result still segfaults
immediately.
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug
btw won't wine 0.9.55 be replaced soon with the 0.9.56 which was
released today?
I can also confirm the amd64 gutsy package works from the wine archive.
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I wrote:
Did you download it from the website, or enable the repository? I just enabled
the repo on my computer, cleared the wine package from the apt cache, then
reinstalled it(It downloaded the package, so I know it wasn't the old one),
but I'm still getting a segmentation fault.
Apparently
Exporting CC from within debian/rules (in pbuilder) doesn't seem enough
(gcc-4.1 *is* used however). I'm trying with CXX and CPP as well now,
but it'll be another hour or so to build on my machine.
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug
I tried to build the latest wine from hardy on a i386-machine with
forced usage of gcc 4.1 and it works without segfaults, so there seems
to be something with gcc 4.2 that breaks wine in hardy. I haven't tried
building it cleanly with pbuilder because I don't know of a good way
to force compiler
It's because we're using a newer fontforge, which has a regression.
An even newer fontforge will fix the problem - we might need to ask for
a UVF exception for it, though.
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a
The problem itself is not wine.
the problem lies in the deep magic of sbuild ...
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Please do not assign bugs randomly...I'm subscribed to all wine bugs by
default...
** Changed in: wine (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Stephan Hermann (shermann) = (unassigned)
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a
Could kernel versions matter to sbuild?
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I think I have got a working wine package again. It builds in a Hardy amd64
pbuilder and testing wine wordpad and winecfg works fine on hardy amd64.
The problem seems to be in the LDFLAGS set by the new dpkg-buildpackage:
-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions. I found another reference to this problem on
@albert:
thx for this...it works...and somehow i missed the wine-bugs report
because the bug itself was closed/invalid :(
wine 0.9.56 is just an hour away from us :)
\sh
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a
@Scott,
nope...I have a working wine package in the meantime..thx to albert...
\sh
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
This bug was fixed in the package wine - 0.9.56-0ubuntu1
---
wine (0.9.56-0ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
* New upstream release (LP: #197588)
- Proper handling of OpenGL/Direct3D windows with menu bars.
- Stubs for all the d3dx9_xx dlls.
- Several graphics optimizations.
That's nice, but the new version still has the marlett.ttf bug, whereas the
0.9.55-winehq version
(wine_0.9.55~winehq0~ubuntu~7.10-1_i386) doesn't. Would it be possible to
include the (?old) marlett font version instead of the one that gives incorrect
symbols? See
@Scott,
compiling wine from source directly on the system without using pbuilder/sbuild
works...even after make install and running wine from /usr/bin...
building it via sbuild/pbuilder and building a package doesn't work
Strange, but true.
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
I agree that using the Wine deb from Wine HQ works for running windows
apps, but only after some tweaking. I found out that compiling 0.9.54 or
0.9.55 from source, getting debs from this versions from WineHQ or the
latest deb from Ubuntu repo would produce the same segfaults when trying
to run
Stephan Hermann appears to have upload this version, assigning to him.
** Changed in: wine (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Stephan Hermann (shermann)
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Just updated to Wine version 0.9.56~winehq0~ubuntu-7.10-1 from the
Wine(budgetdedicated) repository and it doesn't segfault(at least with
winecfg... haven't tested with other programs yet)! ^.^
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification
@Marcelo: does he provide the source package too? if so, we could have a
look...
regards,
\sh
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Installing from
http://wine.budgetdedicated.com/archive/ubuntu/gutsy/wine_0.9.55~winehq0~ubuntu~7.10-1_i386.deb
wine works, but from repository get segmentation fault.
I notice too that the Ubuntu native build was ~34Mb, whereas the winehq
build was ~9Mb.
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
There was some discussion on Wine bugzilla about a regression in
fontforge causing the problem. We may need to push a newer fontforge in
as well.
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
someone on the ubuntuforums posted a x86 deb package of 0.9.56. it
works perfectly fine for me.
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
I tried it and it did not work on Hardy.
However, I found out that when I boot using kernel 2.6.22-14, any version of
wine, from Ubuntu repos or WineHQ, works perfectly.
Regards,
Effenberg
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification
WineHQ is perfect for me too
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Hello, I have Wine and Cross Over Office installed for a year or more
and it survived Ubuntu updates since Dapper transparently. Since I
updated to Hardy I noticed the Windows Applications were still running
normally, but winecfg was crashing (for both CXOffice and Wine 0.9.54
and 0.9.55 from
It didn't work :(
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ winecfg
wine: creating configuration directory '/home/effenberg/.wine'...
Segmentation fault
wine: wineprefixcreate failed while creating '/home/effenberg/.wine'.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# wineserver: could not save registry branch to
There will be a new wine version in hardy, just because we know at least what
the problem could be.
There is a fix coming along, and looks like 0.9.57 is a good candidate.
We all know that, and we will provide a working wine version for hardy.
Regards,
\sh
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
no 0.9.56 will not be in hardy as the feature freeze is already in effect,
which leads me to the original reason i was going to comment in this bug...
might this be fixed by pushing 0.9.56 in hardy via a FFe (feature freeze
exception for those that don't know)?
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
For Universe and Multiverse SRU's FTBFS, not installable, and segfault on
startup ( e.g. completely un-usable ) can also be considered
I think, because wine is currently completely un-usable, including 0.9.56, if
it fixes the bug would be
Stephen Cradock:
I believe that has something to do with this bug:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10660
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Ouch! - that would explain it, wouldn't it? Let's all hope it can be
sorted out soon.
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I actually meant the 0.9.56 version being in the hardy repos (or isn't a
new version updated, even for alpha releases?)
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I hope 0.9.56 will replace 0.9.55 in Hardy, may be difficult but it's
worth the effort.
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Would it be at all possible for someone to privately shoot me a copy of
the AMD64.deb? I followed the rapidshare link, but it only took me
around in a circle and asked for an access code which was never
provided. Thanks for any help.
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
i solved my SEGFAULTs by installing deb package wine_0.9.55 for gutsy
form WineHQ..
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I can confirm that the Gutsy/WineHQ 0.9.55 works on Hardy.
My understanding is that the same packager now handles both -- or am I
wrong?
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
wine-0.9.55
I also have problem with wine.
$ wine --version works
wine-0.9.55
$ wine notepad.exe
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
David Tomaschik:
I can confirm that the Gutsy/WineHQ 0.9.55 works on Hardy.
Did you download it from the website, or enable the repository? I just
enabled the repo on my computer, cleared the wine package from the apt
cache, then reinstalled it(It downloaded the package, so I know it
wasn't the
it's package from this archive:
http://wine.budgetdedicated.com/archive/index.html
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
the question here: which library.
I'm building wine with clean chroots and pbuilders and I always get segfaults.
So, doing it in clean chroots etc. is just the way it compiles on our buildd..
the only change I saw was a new upload of gcc 4.2.2.2 to gcc 4.2.2.3 between
wine 0.9.54 and 0.9.55...
It gets stranger here.
After success with my own builds I reinstalled the version of Stephan and now
it works. Anybody else also has this observation? Is one of the other updates
today responsible?
I cannot be of much assistance here now because the error is not reproducible
by me anymore. I
Does not work (segfaulting):
mkdir ~/src
cd ~/src
sudo -i
apt-get build-dep wine apt-get source --build wine
This does work:
mkdir ~/src
cd ~/src
sudo -i
apt-get source wine
cd wine-0.9.55
./configure
make depend make
sudo make install
(for me)
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
builded by apt-build doesnt work! (segfault too)
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
The lpng12 vs lpng difference was due to 2 patches provided in the
debian/paches directory.
They seem to be out of order because the build used libpng before the paches
but skipped it afterwards. But my version had them automatically applied so
they skipped png but the clean version would skip
More information on the difference between my build and the clean build
(build a pbuilder environment)
--- output_clean2008-02-19 16:19:41.0 +0100
+++ output 2008-02-18 17:41:35.0 +0100
@@ -454,14 +454,14 @@
checking for X11/extensions/xf86vmode.h... yes
checking
strace output
** Attachment added: strace
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12091027/strace
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
I got this:
.
.
.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/wine/usr/lib/wine/start.exe.so shouldn't be
linked with libm.so.6 (it uses none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/wine/usr/lib/wine/crtdll.dll.so shouldn't be
linked with libm.so.6 (it uses none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps:
Those warnings should be harmless
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Same here on Hardy x86. Official deb of previous version works well.
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Hi Jurjen,
interessting. The fun part behind that is, that i386 packages are being
stripped, but amd64 are not being stripped. But on both architectures we see
the segfaults.
And which incompatible library was used.
Would be cool and nice if you can provide this info.
in the meantime, I'm
I rebuild the wine package for myself without stripping the symbols:
sudo apt-get build-dep wine
apt-get source wine
cd wine-0.9.55
export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
cd ..
sudo dpkg -i wine_0.9.55-0ubuntu1_i386.deb
And now my wine 0.9.55 runs perfectly without
What I expected.. it was the rebuild and not the stripping that did the job.
So here is the output of ./configure so you can match it with yours to find the
differences. I probably have some package or a version of it installed that is
different from the clean build on the server.
**
So, we are still with the bug eventually in stripped binaries.
Thx,
\sh
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
More information:
ubuntu version hardy haron updated till head
building on a AMD64 machine with ubuntu i386 architecture binaries installed (a
bit of legacy)
the library ramble was just my second guessing by looking at the dumps.. just
ignore that for now
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
i tried the no strip option and still seg faults on i386
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
The fact of the package is built with or without debug symbols has not
to do with the crash. I just rebuilt the package here and it worked
fine.
I second that it must be some library's fault, not wine itself.
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this
valgrind -v wine '/home/maxe/Desktop/Download/alt/dotnetfx.exe'
==7394== Memcheck, a memory error detector.
==7394== Copyright (C) 2002-2007, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==7394== Using LibVEX rev 1804, a library for dynamic binary translation.
==7394== Copyright (C) 2004-2007, and GNU
i can confirm this
Kubuntu 8.04
wine 0.9.55-0ubuntu1
:~$ wine --version
wine-0.9.55
:~$ winecfg
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
: ~$ whatever.exe
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
had no problem with wine 0.9.54
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received
confirm here. I tested with previous kernel (2.6.24-7) but the error
seems in wine. :(
Using the command learnt with the guys before:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.wine/drive_c/Arquivos de programas/eMule$ gdb --args wine
emule.exe
GNU gdb 6.7.1-debian
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
there isn't package for hardy!!!
--
wine segfaults on winecfg, hardy x86_64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Xan: If you're using Hardy, you should expect this sort of breakage.
Hardy is an Alpha distribution, and it is perfectly acceptable for it to
break at times. Run Gutsy if you need stability. That being said, the
Gutsy version of 0.9.54 will probably run on Hardy just fine.
--
wine segfaults on
ok sorry,
I thought it was possible to download the old wine compiled for hardy.
wine compiled for gutsy cant install for break dependency
any idea of this problem?
--
wine segfaults on winecfg, hardy x86_64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you
Since I have not had problems with the 54, may not be a problem caused
by another package?
--
wine segfaults on winecfg, hardy x86_64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
I traced problem with gdb on x86:
$ gdb --args wine ./Steam.exe
GNU gdb 6.7.1-debian
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO
** Summary changed:
- wine segfaults on winecfg, hardy x86_64
+ wine segfaults on winecfg
** Changed in: wine (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
wine segfaults on winecfg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
i can confirm
:~$ winecfg
Segmentation fault
i use wine 0.9.55-0ubuntu1 and ubuntu hardy
with 0.9.54 i haven't this problem...
--
wine segfaults on winecfg, hardy x86_64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
where i can find wine 0.9.54? i need wine today plz...
--
wine segfaults on winecfg, hardy x86_64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Same here ... Core dumed!!!
0.9.55-0ubuntu1
--
wine segfaults on winecfg, hardy x86_64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
http://wine.budgetdedicated.com/archive/index.html
--
wine segfaults on winecfg, hardy x86_64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I can confirm that wine_0.9.55-0ubuntu1_i386 segfaults as well, though
previous versions work fine.
** Changed in: wine (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
wine segfaults on winecfg, hardy x86_64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575
You received this bug notification because you are a
90 matches
Mail list logo
