[Bug 191716] Re: /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing

2008-03-12 Thread Robert Bradford
This solution is wrong. What does the submitter mean by This causes lots of crashes in different places. Runtime crashes should not be caused by a missing symlink since the binary and plugins will be linked to the real name for the library. The .so symlink is only used when linking a 3rd party

[Bug 191716] Re: /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing

2008-03-12 Thread Jonh Wendell
What I remember is that the crash was caused by a plugin (or more than one plugin). Creating that slink fixed the problem. Of course, I don't have the bt anymore... -- /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191716 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 191716] Re: /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing

2008-03-12 Thread Robert Bradford
Do you have a /usr/lib/glade3/modules/libgladeanjuta.so ? And if so can you run strings /usr/lib/glade3/modules/libgladeanjuta.so | grep libanjuta against it. As well as dpkg -S. -- /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191716 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 191716] Re: /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing

2008-03-12 Thread Jonh Wendell
No, this file doesn't exist... -- /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 191716] Re: /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing

2008-03-12 Thread Robert Bradford
I tracked this down to the subversion plugin's glade file. This has a requires lib='anjuta' / which then leads to libglade2 to try and open /usr/lib/libanjuta.so (through g_module_open) So adding a symlink is a valid solution and at least we now know why ;-) -- /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing

[Bug 191716] Re: /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing

2008-02-26 Thread Christophe Sauthier (huats)
** Changed in: anjuta (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Christophe Sauthier (huats) (christophe.sauthier) -- /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 191716] Re: /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing

2008-02-26 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package anjuta - 2:2.3.5-0ubuntu1 --- anjuta (2:2.3.5-0ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low * New upstream version * Remove *.so from anjuta-dev and put them in the anjuta binary (Fixes LP: #191716) -- Christophe Sauthier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 26 Feb

[Bug 191716] Re: /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing

2008-02-19 Thread Matvey Kozhev
Is this really the right way to fix it? Maybe it would be better to fix the places that depend on libanjuta.so? ** Changed in: anjuta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191716 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 191716] Re: /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing

2008-02-14 Thread Jonh Wendell
** Attachment added: debdiff for this bug http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11956098/191716.diff -- /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. --

[Bug 191716] Re: /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing

2008-02-14 Thread Sebastien Bacher
you need to use replaces in the control -- /usr/lib/libanjuta.so missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com