[Bug 1940999] Re: FTBFS against glibc 2.34

2021-09-09 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package grep - 3.7-0ubuntu1 --- grep (3.7-0ubuntu1) impish; urgency=medium * New upstream version 3.7 to fix FTBFS (LP: #1940999) * Use built-in regex instead of the one from glibc, to address failure of test-regex with version 3.7. -- Dan Bungert

[Bug 1940999] Re: FTBFS against glibc 2.34

2021-08-30 Thread Dan Bungert
> How about: > * New upstream version 3.7 to fix FTBFS (LP: #1940999) Yes, I like that better. OK, I have updated my proposal. I recommend that we address this FTBFS by using grep 3.7 with built-in regex. This is a change from current and will increase binary size. (180k -> 260k when

[Bug 1940999] Re: FTBFS against glibc 2.34

2021-08-30 Thread Dan Bungert
** Attachment added: "grep_3.7-0ubuntu1.dsc" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grep/+bug/1940999/+attachment/5521729/+files/grep_3.7-0ubuntu1.dsc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1940999] Re: FTBFS against glibc 2.34

2021-08-30 Thread Dan Bungert
** Attachment added: "grep_3.7-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grep/+bug/1940999/+attachment/5521728/+files/grep_3.7-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1940999] Re: FTBFS against glibc 2.34

2021-08-30 Thread Dan Bungert
Add upstream NEWS file diff. One change that upstream felt relevant enough to point out, outside of bug fixes, was a change to a Windows only option. ** Attachment removed: "grep_3.7-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz"

[Bug 1940999] Re: FTBFS against glibc 2.34

2021-08-27 Thread Robie Basak
Ah, sorry. I saw "disable-regex" and thought that was a description of the resolution to the failing stack-overflow test! If updating grep to 3.7 is the easiest way to fix the problem then we can consider that. But since we're in Feature Freeze for Impish, this needs an assessment for feature

[Bug 1940999] Re: FTBFS against glibc 2.34

2021-08-25 Thread Mathew Hodson
** Changed in: grep (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940999 Title: FTBFS against glibc 2.34 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1940999] Re: FTBFS against glibc 2.34

2021-08-25 Thread Dan Bungert
One possibility that's starting to grow on me is adjusting grep to go back to using the built-in regex instead of getting it from glibc. This causes some size bloat (+80k on amd64) but that might be tolerable. Proof of concept: https://launchpad.net/~dbungert/+archive/ubuntu/grep-lp-1940999 --

Re: [Bug 1940999] Re: FTBFS against glibc 2.34

2021-08-25 Thread Dan Bungert
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 12:00:44PM -, Robie Basak wrote: > Thank you for working on this! And thank you for the thoughtful review. > > To address this I propose picking up the new version of grep. > But you're picking up the new version of grep and then also disabling > the failing test in

[Bug 1940999] Re: FTBFS against glibc 2.34

2021-08-25 Thread Robie Basak
> +Last-Update: Aug-24-2021 This should use ISO format according to the spec please (https://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940999 Title: FTBFS against

[Bug 1940999] Re: FTBFS against glibc 2.34

2021-08-25 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for working on this! > To address this I propose picking up the new version of grep. But you're picking up the new version of grep and then also disabling the failing test in that update. So why is the new version of grep necessary at all? Can't you just disable the failing test in the

[Bug 1940999] Re: FTBFS against glibc 2.34

2021-08-24 Thread Dan Bungert
** Changed in: grep (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940999 Title: FTBFS against glibc 2.34 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1940999] Re: FTBFS against glibc 2.34

2021-08-24 Thread Dan Bungert
To address this I propose picking up the new version of grep. ** Attachment added: "grep_3.7-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grep/+bug/1940999/+attachment/5520320/+files/grep_3.7-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1940999] Re: FTBFS against glibc 2.34

2021-08-24 Thread Dan Bungert
** Patch added: "upstream-ChangeLog.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grep/+bug/1940999/+attachment/5520323/+files/upstream-ChangeLog.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1940999] Re: FTBFS against glibc 2.34

2021-08-24 Thread Dan Bungert
This summary file is the differences to the debian directories between 3.6-1 and 3.7 ** Attachment added: "changes.summary" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grep/+bug/1940999/+attachment/5520322/+files/changes.summary -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1940999] Re: FTBFS against glibc 2.34

2021-08-24 Thread Dan Bungert
** Attachment added: "grep_3.7-0ubuntu1.dsc" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grep/+bug/1940999/+attachment/5520321/+files/grep_3.7-0ubuntu1.dsc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.