This bug was fixed in the package swtpm - 0.6.3-0ubuntu1
---
swtpm (0.6.3-0ubuntu1) jammy; urgency=medium
* Update to the stable release v0.6.3 (LP: 1948748)
- swtpm:
+ Do not chdir(/) when using --daemon
+ Check header size indicator against expected size
FYI - Fixup uploaded as part of 0.6.3-0ubuntu1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950631
Title:
[FFe] wrap swtpm in an apparmor profile
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Ah sorry, not sure how I didn't see that. I'll get to reviewing the mp
then
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950631
Title:
[FFe] wrap swtpm in an apparmor profile
To manage
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~lvoytek/ubuntu/+source/swtpm/+git/swtpm/+merge/417342
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950631
Title:
[FFe] wrap swtpm in an
It is all ready for review and tested in
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/swtpm/+git/swtpm/+merge/417221
already.
No need to act other than reviewing this one.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thank you for finding that! I can get a merge request going for it.
Should I try and get it added in before the version bump?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950631
Title:
[FFe] wrap
Now things pass locally, running the same on infra over lunch to see if
it is good there as well.
Testsuite summary for swtpm 0.6.3
# TOTAL:
Test stuck here:
4 0 356 1 20 0 2888 1716 - Ss hvc1 0:00 /bin/sh
1 03081 356 20 0 2888 140 - S+ hvc1 0:00 \_
/bin/sh
4 030823081 20 0 10192 4268 - S+ hvc1 0:00
\_ su -s /bin/bash ubuntu -c set
FYI this is blocked in proposed failing its autopkgtests.
This is reproducible in Ubuntu infra as well as locally in VM.
I'll try to extend the rules as needed and will let you know what i
found eventually.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Thank you Steve!
Re-reviewed and sponsored to Jammy
@Lena - do not forget to try to upstream it so that at some point we can drop
the Delta.
** Changed in: swtpm (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
FFe granted.
** Changed in: swtpm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950631
Title:
[FFe] wrap swtpm in an apparmor profile
To manage
** Description changed:
Dear Release Team,
Please accept the swtpm apparmor profile as a Jammy FFe.
PPA: ppa:lvoytek/swtpm-apparmor-profile-jammy
[Rationale]
- We would like to MIR swtpm in the near future, and adding in the
- apparmor profile is needed for this to happen for
** Changed in: swtpm (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950631
Title:
[FFe] wrap swtpm in an apparmor profile
To manage notifications about
** Description changed:
+ Dear Release Team,
+
Please accept the swtpm apparmor profile as a Jammy FFe.
+
+ PPA: ppa:lvoytek/swtpm-apparmor-profile-jammy
[Rationale]
We would like to MIR swtpm in the near future, and adding in the
apparmor profile is needed for this to happen for
** Description changed:
Please accept the swtpm apparmor profile as a Jammy FFe.
[Rationale]
We would like to MIR swtpm in the near future, and adding in the
apparmor profile is needed for this to happen for security.
[Regression Potential]
If the apparmor profile is
It seems we need no libvirt task for this and since swtpm can be used
without libvirt having it in src:swtpm itself is better anyway.
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: swtpm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu)
** Tags removed: server-next
** Tags added: server-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950631
Title:
[FFe] wrap swtpm in an apparmor profile
To manage notifications about this bug
** Description changed:
+ Please accept the swtpm apparmor profile as a Jammy FFe.
+
+ [Rationale]
+
+ We would like to MIR swtpm in the near future, and adding in the
+ apparmor profile is needed for this to happen for security.
+
+ [Regression Potential]
+
+ If the apparmor profile is
** Summary changed:
- wrap swtpm in an apparmor profile
+ [FFe] wrap swtpm in an apparmor profile
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950631
Title:
[FFe] wrap swtpm in an apparmor
19 matches
Mail list logo
