[Bug 1961901] Re: 3.6.2-1 FTBFS in Jammy on x86/s390x

2022-02-24 Thread Miriam España Acebal
Thank you Christian for the sponsorship, the test environment and the commands. The first test that is failing looks for a string phrase (test/suite_decryption.py @ line 271 self.assertTrue(self.grepOutput('Who has 192.168.1.1')) ). I put a line of debug in the countOutput function

[Bug 1961901] Re: 3.6.2-1 FTBFS in Jammy on x86/s390x

2022-02-24 Thread Miriam España Acebal
** Changed in: lto-disabled-list (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961901 Title: 3.6.2-1 FTBFS in Jammy on

[Bug 1961901] Re: 3.6.2-1 FTBFS in Jammy on x86/s390x

2022-02-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package lto-disabled-list - 22 --- lto-disabled-list (22) jammy; urgency=medium * Add wireshark @ arm64 s390x (LP: #1961901) -- Miriam España Acebal Thu, 24 Feb 2022 13:11:15 +0100 ** Changed in: lto-disabled-list (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix

[Bug 1961901] Re: 3.6.2-1 FTBFS in Jammy on x86/s390x

2022-02-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Repro: $ cd ~/wireshark-3.6.2/obj-s390x-linux-gnu $ /usr/bin/cmake -E env PYTHONIOENCODING=UTF-8 /usr/bin/python3.10 ../test/test.py --verbose --program-path /root/wireshark-3.6.2/obj-s390x-linux-gnu/run suite_decryption This will trigger the same fails, but run just this test. And to pick

[Bug 1961901] Re: 3.6.2-1 FTBFS in Jammy on x86/s390x

2022-02-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Thanks, I reviewed and sponsored the lto-disabled change. For the remaining s390x issue please use the s390x containers that we set up to debug this Miriam -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1961901] Re: 3.6.2-1 FTBFS in Jammy on x86/s390x

2022-02-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/lto-disabled-list/+git/lto-disabled-list/+merge/416029 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961901 Title:

[Bug 1961901] Re: 3.6.2-1 FTBFS in Jammy on x86/s390x

2022-02-24 Thread Miriam España Acebal
Hi! I made several buildings in a ppa (arm64,s 390x and proposed pocket) here [1], with three scenarios: 1) the optimization moutline-atomics (sorry for the misunderstanding) plus disabling Bsymbolic-functions -> doesn't work 2) only disabling Bsymbolic-functions (in a bad attempt to restrict

[Bug 1961901] Re: 3.6.2-1 FTBFS in Jammy on x86/s390x

2022-02-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
And by opening my eyes (thanks Miriam) this wasn't ever on amd64 but only arm64 (+s390x). Ok, so ignore my local tests, we'll need arm64 or s390x systems for this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1961901] Re: 3.6.2-1 FTBFS in Jammy on x86/s390x

2022-02-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Attachment added: "build as-is locally against jammy-proposed on x86 - working" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireshark/+bug/1961901/+attachment/5563424/+files/wireshark_3.6.2-1_amd64.build -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1961901] Re: 3.6.2-1 FTBFS in Jammy on x86/s390x

2022-02-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
FYI debdiff used in local tests https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/W4JvNthN9H/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961901 Title: 3.6.2-1 FTBFS in Jammy on x86/s390x To manage notifications

[Bug 1961901] Re: 3.6.2-1 FTBFS in Jammy on x86/s390x

2022-02-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Hmm, I quickly rebuilt as-is and with both suggestions disabled in local sbuild. They BOTH worked fine which implies that the build issue on launchpad is a) only happening on launchpad or b) something in jammy-proposed has been fixed in the last few days/hours that resolved this In both cases:

[Bug 1961901] Re: 3.6.2-1 FTBFS in Jammy on x86/s390x

2022-02-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Hi Miriam moutline-atomics was an arm related optimization - that was related to CPC work, but not here. Sorry if my quick hint in the meeting was misleading. I meant to quick try: 1. disable LTO https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ToolChain/LTO 2. do not use symbolic-functions

[Bug 1961901] Re: 3.6.2-1 FTBFS in Jammy on x86/s390x

2022-02-23 Thread Miriam España Acebal
For arm64, the execution of test 15 (/wmem/datastruct/tree) of 37 - suite_unittests ends in SIGSEGV. Adding the compilation flag "-moutline-atomics" didn't work... I'm still investigating. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1961901] Re: 3.6.2-1 FTBFS in Jammy on x86/s390x

2022-02-23 Thread Miriam España Acebal
** Changed in: wireshark (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961901 Title: 3.6.2-1 FTBFS in Jammy on x86/s390x