*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 363174 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363174
I also tried 4xBilinear, it's better (faster than Gaussian and Mipmaps).
Another tip is to choose normal (instead of any) in the Alpha Blur
Windows setting in Compiz Settings.
I think working on intel
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 363174 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363174
4xBilinear may be the fastest, but it barely blurs for me. Gaussian is the next
fastest, but it isn't as clean as Mipmap. Mipmap is slowest but looks better
than the others.
This bug shouldn't be a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 363174 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363174
Sorry for my late reply. No, my chip is x3500.
--
[i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA/EXA)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201264
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 363174 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363174
I agree with Nattgew. A noticable difference even when moving windows,
for example. Very snappy without blur... slow and lagging with blur
enabled. Gaussian is slower than bilinear (which doesn't provide
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 363174 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363174
Which graphic chip have you got? x4500hd like me?
--
[i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA/EXA)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201264
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 363174 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363174
But I don't see any screen garbage in my setup.
My problem is just that the frame rate drops from 100 to 17 after enabling blur.
Should I file another upstream bug?
--
[i965] compiz blur plugin very slow
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 363174 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363174
I don't think this bug is about garbage, just that it's slow. I
haven't noticed any garbage lately, either.
--
[i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA/EXA)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201264
You
Hrm, I considered upstreaming this bug report, but the thread of
comments is very confusing and it is difficult to see what exactly would
need reported other than just it's slow, which is of no help.
So, I would ask that you file your issue upstream yourself, in your own
words, and work with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 363174 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363174
Nevermind, seems this is perhaps a dupe of 363174, which has been more
clearly written so I've upstreamed that one. This can be a dupe of
that.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 363174
