This bug report was marked as Incomplete and has not had any updated
comments for quite some time. As a result this bug is being closed.
Please reopen if this is still an issue in the current Ubuntu release
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download . Also, please be sure to
provide any requested
Hi Hugh,
We will constantly sync with stable tree for our stock kernel, please
make sure sta...@kernel.org is CC'ed in your patch and has been merged
there. OTH, you may check our latest kernel to see if that has been
merged.
--
MTRR ioctls don't work as documented
I tried to use apport-collect but it required more access rights than I
am willing to give it.
Please read #3 -- #1 is confusing.
This bug still exists in 9.04. It also exists in Fedora 11. It is in
upstream (I'm sure, by code inspection).
Note: I said that MTRRs with length =4GiB were not
Hi D.,
Please be sure to confirm this issue exists with the latest development
release of Ubuntu. ISO CD images are available from
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/ . Please then run following command
from a Terminal (Applications-Accessories-Terminal). It will
automatically gather and
[This is an automated message. Apologies if it has reached you
inappropriately.]
This bug was reported against the linux-meta package when it likely
should have been reported against the linux package instead. We are
automatically transitioning this to the linux kernel package so that the
[I got some help from BenC and mjg59 on freenode's #ubuntu-kernel]
It turns out that the kernel's IOCTL code just bails (returns an all-0
struct) if the MTRR size field is =4G. There is no room in the size
field of struct mtrr_gentry (defined in /usr/include/asm/mtrr.h).
See case
** Attachment added: version of mtrr-show that prints even disabled MTRRs
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16416703/mtrr-show.c
--
MTRR ioctls don't work as documented
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I guess I should have stated the version information. Why isn't this
asked?
I'm running 8.04.1. /proc/version says:
Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu
4.2.3-2ubuntu7)) #1 SMP Fri Jul 11 21:01:46 UTC 2008
My system was updated a couple of days ago.
