** Changed in: debian
Status: Unknown = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261988
Title:
[needs-packaging] GNOME-colors icon theme
To manage notifications about this
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/gnome-colors
--
[needs-packaging] GNOME-colors icon theme
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261988
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
gnome-colors 4.5-0ubuntu1 is now in karmic.
** Package changed: ubuntu = gnome-colors (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: gnome-colors (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
[needs-packaging] GNOME-colors icon theme
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261988
You received this bug notification
Has it been confirmed which version of the GPL the included Elementary
icons are released under? All sources I have seen tell that they are
under the GPL, but fail to mention which version. If they are GPLv3, it
would mean that they are not compatible with the other icons in the
theme (most
They are GPLv2, too. Which files claim to be licensed under GPL without
giving a version?
--
[needs-packaging] GNOME-colors icon theme
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261988
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Hi there
I'm sorry, but I can't get the thing with the versioned Conflicts
Replaces sorted out - any hint there? That would be great!
Thanks
--
[needs-packaging] GNOME-colors icon theme
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261988
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Hi Andrew,
I tried to install the gnome colors package from your PPA, but it failed with
the following line:
E: /var/cache/apt/archives/gnome-brave-icon-theme_3.2-0~ppa1_all.deb: trying to
overwrite `/usr/share/icons/gnome-brave/48x48/animations/process-working.png',
which is also in package
This was temporary, because we were too late for jaunty to pass through
NEW.
For karmic, we'll remove them as soon as the 'real' icon theme package
is in the archive. You just need to add a versioned Conflicts Replaces
on xubuntu-artwork, for example ( 0.27~), to provide a flawless
upgrade path.
OK I couldn't say whether this was known already, no problem then. It
would be nice to apply this change in the PPA though, as I'm pretty sure
some other users will get the same problem.
It is a very nice theme by the way, it would be a great addition to
ubuntu, so thanks to all working on this.
Another update for anyone interested:
A package has been submitted for review to Debian Mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package
=gnome-colors
Ubuntu packages are availiable in this PPA for Hardy, Intrepid, and
Jaunty:
This is too late for Jaunty as we are now in feature/beta freeze.
However I will try to help get it into Karmic.
Andrew: Could you possibly fix the duplicate-short-description lintian
warning in the source package? Having: 'a set of GNOME icon themes
(Brave variation)', etc, ought to do it.
--
RE: Copyright
I'm investigating this more. Tango seems to have been relicensed under
the public domain. This is good news as Debian legal has issues with
mixing CC below 3.0 and the GPL.
From tango-icon-theme- 0.8.90/debian/copyright:
In the preparation of the 0.8.90 release Novell took care
Ok, I've added COPYING files to all the artwork and updated them to
GPL v3. I've also moved all the downloads to the google code page and
renamed them project-version.tar.gz.
Hopefully with these changes, it should be much easier to manage
packages and keep hosting older revisions, even if newer
I would prefer to leave the meta-package simply gnome-colors. For the
meta-package it would be better to be closer to upstream. Otherwise we
may use the plural form: gnome-colors-icon-themes.
I did not review debian/copyright, I only fixed the obvious mistakes there.
@perfectska04: Do you use
@Benjamin Drung
All the icons based on gnome-icon-theme should retain their license. All I've
been able to find is that gnome-icon-theme is GPL, but the exact version Is not
specified, so I imagine it's GPLv2+.
Then again, I'm not too knowledgeable when it comes to licensing or
possible
** Attachment added: gnome-colors_3.0-0ubuntu1.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24455544/gnome-colors_3.0-0ubuntu1.debdiff
--
[needs-packaging] GNOME-colors icon theme
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261988
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Nice work, Andrew. Here are some suggestions (see debdiff):
* Switch to debhelper 7 (compat, rules, control).
* debian/rules:
- I have tuned get-orig-source (saver than the previous, you have to recreate
your source tarball)
- Removed all unneeded quotation marks
- Removed unneeded
@Benjamin Drung
Hey, I'm the creator of the GNOME-Colors project.
The bugfix mentioned in the README should only be applied by an user who
willingly wants to use this workaround and fix the nautilus bug, rather
than done by a package. The reasoning is that the command deletes the
inode-directory
To shorten the get-orig-source target you can replace get-orig-source
with $@ (patch attached).
** Attachment added: get-orig-source.patch
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24459328/get-orig-source.patch
--
[needs-packaging] GNOME-colors icon theme
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261988
You
@Benjamin
Thanks so much for the review and suggestions!
I incorporated all your changes except for the short descriptions. I'm
still not satisfied with them nor mine. Debian policy (3.4.1) explicitly
states Do not include the package name in the synopsis line. The
display software knows how to
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #520681
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520681
** Also affects: debian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520681
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
[needs-packaging] GNOME-colors icon theme
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) = Andrew Starr-Bochicchio (andrewsomething)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
[needs-packaging] GNOME-colors icon theme
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261988
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: Cody A.W. Somerville (cody-somerville) = (unassigned)
--
[needs-packaging] GNOME-colors icon theme
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261988
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
As Cody removed himself from the assignee field, I guess he's no longer
interested. I've uploaded my work to REVU:
http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/gnome-colors
--
[needs-packaging] GNOME-colors icon theme
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261988
You received this bug notification because you are a
Hi all,
Has there been any progress on this package?
I'm generally interested in getting some of the more popular themes in
the repositories. To that goal I've worked on the community-themes
package, getting it updated to the newest versions of Dust and New Wave.
I've also been watching this bug
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Triaged = Confirmed
--
[needs-packaging] GNOME-colors icon theme
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261988
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
This should really be packaged in its own package.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Sourcepackagename: xubuntu-artwork = None
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
Status: New = Triaged
--
[needs-packaging] GNOME-colors icon theme
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261988
You received this bug
27 matches
Mail list logo
