[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2014-11-21 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Hardy has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any updates. Marking the Hardy task for this ticket as Won't Fix. ** Changed in: net6 (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix ** Changed in: libinfinity (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2014-11-18 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Karmic has long since stopped to receive any updates. Marking the Karmic task for this ticket as Won't Fix. ** Changed in: libinfinity (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2011-07-22 Thread Philipp Kern
Fixed in libinfinity 0.5, which is in oneiric. ** Changed in: libinfinity (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306955 Title: sobby does not

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2010-10-25 Thread Nick Moffitt
This bug has manifested itself in the infinote package as well, now. Infinote looks like the future sobby server, and it's possible it just needs the fix ported across. In the meantime the only way to work around this seems to be with /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_tw_reuse -- sobby does not appear to

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2010-10-25 Thread Nick Moffitt
On lucid, here are the affected packages: ii infinoted 0.4.1-1 dedicated server for infinote-based collabor ii infinoted-0.4 0.4.1-1

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2010-10-25 Thread Kees Cook
** Also affects: libinfinity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2010-10-25 Thread Kees Cook
This (untested) patch should add SO_REUSEADDR to the gobby server. ** Patch added: libinfinity_0.4.1-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libinfinity/+bug/306955/+attachment/1710776/+files/libinfinity_0.4.1-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- sobby does not appear to use

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2010-10-25 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: patch -- sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2010-10-25 Thread Armin Burgmeier
This has been fixed upstream in infinoted 0.5, with this patch: http://git.0x539.de/?p=infinote.git;a=commitdiff;h=3593a6816d9065be6d1137b4f4f8048ab8b0db8d -- sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306955 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2010-06-20 Thread Philipp Kern
** Changed in: net6 (Ubuntu Hardy) Assignee: Philipp Kern (pkern) = (unassigned) -- sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2009-10-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/net6 -- sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2009-08-31 Thread Martin Pitt
SRU description/impact/regression potential/test case, please? This is still outstanding. -- sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2009-06-15 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: net6 (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: net6 (Ubuntu Hardy) Assignee: (unassigned) = Philipp Kern (pkern) -- sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306955 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2009-06-05 Thread Martin Pitt
SRU description/impact/regression potential/test case, please? ** Also affects: net6 (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: net6 (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: New = Fix Released -- sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2009-06-02 Thread Martin Pitt
I see a net6 upload for this bug in the hardy SRU queue. Please fix this in Karmic first, and add SRU description/subscription. ** Package changed: sobby (Ubuntu) = net6 (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: net6 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = New ** Also affects: net6 (Ubuntu Karmic) Importance:

Re: [Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2009-06-02 Thread Philipp Kern
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 07:20:07AM -, Martin Pitt wrote: I see a net6 upload for this bug in the hardy SRU queue. Please fix this in Karmic first, and add SRU description/subscription. It's already fixed in karmic in 1.3.9-1ubuntu1. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2009-05-29 Thread Armin Burgmeier
Armin, do you have any objection to just set that for every server socket in net6? I'd suggest to add a tcp_server_socket::tcp_server_socket(const address bind_addr, bool reuse_addr) overload. We can then let net6::server always set the reuse_addr flag to true. -- sobby does not appear to use

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2009-05-28 Thread Philipp Kern
** Changed in: sobby (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: sobby (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: sobby (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Philipp Kern (pkern) -- sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2009-05-28 Thread Philipp Kern
** Also affects: obby Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: net6 Importance: Undecided Status: New -- sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2009-05-28 Thread Philipp Kern
There is a slight risk that some invalid data is floating into the application (see http://www.unixguide.net/network/socketfaq/4.5.shtml), but I don't know how common it is. I don't consider this anymore a security measure at all anymore as those daemons actively try to get rid of it and they

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2008-12-11 Thread Chris Jones
I ran into this with a wedged sobby that I had to kill and was then unable to restart for a few minutes. AIUI SO_REUSEADDR is widespread in network daemons because the security risk is minimal. -- sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306955 You received

[Bug 306955] Re: sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags

2008-12-10 Thread Philipp Kern
In theory that's a security measure and it should not happen if sobby is SIGTERM'ed (i.e. if the socket is closed cleanly), or does it? -- sobby does not appear to use socket reuse flags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu