[Bug 322798] Re: Segfault in hald startup (hald/linux/devices.c)

2009-03-23 Thread Martin Pitt
This was already done in upstream commit 336d871860710af1cb3a55234d5051f01e842e02. The fix is in Jaunty already. ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- Segfault in hald startup (hald/linux/devices.c) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322798 You received this bug

[Bug 322798] Re: Segfault in hald startup (hald/linux/devices.c)

2009-03-18 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu Jaunty) Assignee: (unassigned) = Martin Pitt (pitti) Status: New = In Progress -- Segfault in hald startup (hald/linux/devices.c) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 322798] Re: Segfault in hald startup (hald/linux/devices.c)

2009-03-18 Thread Martin Pitt
Doesn't block current arm builds any more; patch might still make sense, though. Taking off the release radar. ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu Jaunty) Status: In Progress = Won't Fix Target: ubuntu-9.04-beta = None -- Segfault in hald startup (hald/linux/devices.c)

[Bug 322798] Re: Segfault in hald startup (hald/linux/devices.c)

2009-03-18 Thread Carsten V. Munk
Alternate fix on http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~carsten-munk/hal/led- problem/revision/2 (incorrect name in changelog) - we ran into the same issue on 2.6.21-omap1 on Nokia N8x0s. Issue happened sporadically. -- Segfault in hald startup (hald/linux/devices.c) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322798

[Bug 322798] Re: Segfault in hald startup (hald/linux/devices.c)

2009-03-11 Thread Loïc Minier
** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu Jaunty) Target: None = ubuntu-9.04-beta ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu Jaunty) Importance: Undecided = High ** Tags added: arm -- Segfault in hald startup (hald/linux/devices.c) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322798 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 322798] Re: Segfault in hald startup (hald/linux/devices.c)

2009-01-29 Thread Dave Martin
** Attachment added: Possible fix, based on the assumption that the code is trying to process a NULL-terminated argument vector. This patch requires sanity-checking with regard to what the code is trying to do: should arguments _ever_ have fewer than three non-NULL elements, for example?