[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2011-02-03 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel Importance: Unknown = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354688 Title: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2011-01-25 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel Importance: Medium = Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354688 Title: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-06-21 Thread EvanCarroll
Changing back to confirmed, there is not yet a fix (bug still occurs in a new install) there is a workaround as mentioned in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/354688/comments/16 ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Jaunty) Status: Fix

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-06-21 Thread Steve Langasek
The crash bug *is* fixed. Other issues should be filed as separate reports (if they aren't already). ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Jaunty) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354688 You received

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-05-03 Thread Guillaume Giroux
new bug for video playback failure in Jaunty: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video- intel/+bug/371275 -- crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354688 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-05-02 Thread Sampe
I just installed this update: replacing: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.6.3-0ubuntu9 (with .../xserver-xorg-video-intel_2%3a2.6.3-0ubuntu9.1_amd64.deb It does NOT solve this bug, though I'am not sure it should but at least you now it is still there in the xserver-xorg-video-intel_2%3a2.6.3-0

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-30 Thread Bob McElrath
I confirm João's comment above. With the official jaunty release 2.6.3-0ubuntu9, video players crash when directed to use xv. Telling gstreamer not to use xv works around it. In my case, video in vlc/mplayer/totem works fine initially, but if one forces a repaint of the screen, X will crash.

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-22 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354688 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-19 Thread João Olavo Vasconcelos
I also can't play any video format at any video player (totem, kaffeine, mplayer, vlc, miro...). The outputs are the same presented by IcedEarth. Workaround to get it working: open gstreamer-properties. Then, Video tab, Default Output section. Change the Plugin from Autodetect to X Window System

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-07 Thread nowardev
in the server kernel we still have this problem but with generic and rt kernel it works fine here i have attached my lspci and other stuff anyway for me now there is not this problem anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video- intel/+bug/356088 -- crash in

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-07 Thread IcedEarth
Me too, as in regard to Bug #351869. I have updated to the new xserver- xorg-video-intel this morning, (2:2.6.3-0ubuntu8) still unable to play video in VLC, totem etc. Totem: The program 'totem' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-07 Thread Björn Tillenius
The issue I reported in bug 353023 is still not quite fixed. I don't get any crashes anymore, but I still can't play video, neither in mplayer nor in totem. Should I file a new bug about that? I'm attaching my new Xorg.0.log file. ** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log (with 2:2.6.3-0ubuntu7)

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-06 Thread Bryce Harrington
Hi Steve, actually what I meant was I needed a full backtrace, like what Albert attached, sorry I wasn't more specific... been a long week. Albert, thanks muchly for the analysis and patch. It looks good and I'll upload it tomorrow. Meanwhile please do see if you can get upstream's comment on

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-06 Thread Steve Beattie
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Jaunty) Assignee: (unassigned) = Canonical Desktop Team (canonical-desktop-team) -- crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354688 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package xserver-xorg-video-intel - 2:2.6.3-0ubuntu7 --- xserver-xorg-video-intel (2:2.6.3-0ubuntu7) jaunty; urgency=low * Add 119_drm_bo_unreference_needs_null.patch: - The first time through the Xv code, an allocated buffer is unreferenced but

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-06 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel Status: Unknown = Confirmed -- crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354688 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-06 Thread Rick Spencer
Nice to see this one fixed. ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Jaunty) Assignee: Canonical Desktop Team (canonical-desktop-team) = Bryce Harrington (bryceharrington) -- crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354688 You received this bug

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-05 Thread Albert Damen
I was able to reproduce this on my 945 and got a full backtrace. ** Attachment added: totem-crash.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24835744/totem-crash.txt -- crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354688 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-05 Thread Albert Damen
The problem is in xxv-intel, src/i830_video.c In I830PutImage: if (pPriv-buf == NULL) { pPriv-buf = drm_intel_bo_alloc(pI830-bufmgr, xv buffer, alloc_size, 4096); if (pPriv-buf == NULL) return BadAlloc; if

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-05 Thread Albert Damen
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #21060 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21060 ** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21060 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- crash in

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-04 Thread Steve Langasek
A backtrace from gdb looks the same as the backtrace included in the bug description. Is there more specific information that you're looking for? I had a closer look at the disassembly, the segfault is actually in the line ret = ioctl(bufmgr_gem-fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_SET_DOMAIN,

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-03 Thread Steve Langasek
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24765054/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: LsHal.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24765055/LsHal.txt ** Attachment added: LsMod.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24765057/LsMod.txt ** Attachment added: LsPci.txt

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-03 Thread Steve Langasek
Readily reproducible for me here, so if more info is needed, let me know. The crash appears (based on a disassembly of the function with gdb - nothing so proper as catching a crash in action) to be happening at the line set_domain.handle = bo_gem-gem_handle; when dereferencing bo_gem. **

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-03 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: xorg (Ubuntu Jaunty) Importance: High Status: Confirmed -- crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354688 You

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-03 Thread VangelistX
Please have a look at that bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/354735 Maybe is the same one? -- crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354688 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-03 Thread Steve Langasek
No, these bugs don't appear to have any relation to one another. -- crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354688 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-03 Thread Steve Langasek
Have twiddled a few knobs, and: (EE) intel(0): Cannot support DRI with frame buffer width 2048. this message in Xorg.0.log appears to be key. If I lower the virtual res in xorg.conf, I don't get the crash. If I subsequently set NoAccel, I still don't get the crash. It's only when I have my

[Bug 354688] Re: crash in drm_intel_gem_bo_start_gtt_access

2009-04-03 Thread Bryce Harrington
Steve, thanks for chasing it down in gdb, but could you also put a trace onto this bug report? Heh, of course as fate would have it, there's three exact instances of that line. Smells like a nullptr deref but a full backtrace would help in sorting it out. -- crash in