This bug report was marked as Incomplete and has not had any updated
comments for quite some time. As a result this bug is being closed.
Please reopen if this is still an issue in the current Ubuntu release
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download . Also, please be sure to
provide any requested
Sorry i could not test this anymore, JFS was kicked away from both
mobile with 9.10 update cause of this issue. Using ext4 here that mounts
well with matching install cd / usb-stick. Someout out to do this test?
--
9.04 Live-CD did not mount jfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367237
You
Hi er...@hamburg,
This bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in
it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? Can you try
with the latest development release of Ubuntu? ISO CD images are
available from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid.
If it remains
Same here on an INSTALLED Linux storm 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP
Fri Apr 17 01:58:03 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux.
No mounting of existing jfs partitions possible.
--
9.04 Live-CD did not mount jfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367237
You received this bug notification because you are a
I found the reason why it didn't work (for me): the jfs-partition was
(for some reason !?) unclean and i had to manually fs-check it to be
able to mount it again.
the irritating thing is, that jfs did not report it (not even via dmesg)
und you have to guess that it's unclean.
ubuntu should
** Package changed: ubuntu = linux (Ubuntu)
--
9.04 Live-CD did not mount jfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367237
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Hello
above happens with i386 livecd on a amd64 system. This is crazy cause a
amd64 livecd mounts the partition well, who can check this? Is there a
difference between amd64 and i386 jfs?
If this is my pbkac, the bug can be closed.
Eric
--
9.04 Live-CD did not mount jfs
