[Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-06-15 Thread H.-Dirk Schmitt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 374002 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374002 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 374002 [snd_usb_audio] snd_pcm_avail() returned a value that is exceptionally large -- snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

[Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-06-05 Thread mlindeblom
I am running 2.6.30-7-generic #8-Ubuntu SMP Mon May 25 13:52:54 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux After rebooting, I unmute and adjust the volume level to max and still get no audio. Issung pkill pulseaudio; sleep 2; pulseaudio give me a working audio for mplayer, vlc and rhythmbox. Alsa output

Re: [Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-06-05 Thread Daniel T Chen
Everyone, For this behavior to be valid as a regression in karmic, you need to be using 2.6.30-8.9-generic, not 2.6.30-7.8-generic. On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:56 AM, mlindeblomlinde...@mts.net wrote: I am running 2.6.30-7-generic #8-Ubuntu SMP Mon May 25 13:52:54 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux Also,

Re: [Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-06-05 Thread Daniel T Chen
The necessary patches are in karmic's 2.6.30-8.9-generic, but I'm tracking a possible regression in one of the changesets. On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Jared Wiltshirejaredwiltsh...@gmail.com wrote: OK I believe the patches are in the 2.6.30 series kernels or you can build the latest ALSA

Re: [Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-06-05 Thread Daniel T Chen
jaunty-proposed's 2.6.28-13.xx-generic reverts a few of the added changesets, because they cause severe regressions on several HDA controllers (that can be hacked around via snd_hda_intel parameters but certainly are not feasible from a default perspective). On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Jared

[Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-06-05 Thread mlindeblom
Confirmed 2.6.30-8-generic #9-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jun 3 15:38:38 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux appears to solve this bug. -- snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-06-02 Thread Jared Wiltshire
Also getting the same thing with Realtek ALC889A onboard audio on a Gigabyte P35-DS3P motherboard. Running self compiled 2.6.29 kernel on Ubuntu 9.04 64-bit. Sometimes it works fine but more often than not the sound just plays really choppy. Changing between digital and analog output profiles

[Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-06-02 Thread Jared Wiltshire
Oh yeh using Pulseaudio 0.9.15 from PPA. -- snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-06-02 Thread Jared Wiltshire
This bug seems to be closely related to this bug reported in Fedora - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472339 Only it seems this is affecting people using the snd_hda_intel driver rather than snd-intel8x0 Seem the problem is probably related to the driver not pulseaudio as well.. **

[Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-06-02 Thread Jared Wiltshire
As per http://www.pulseaudio.org/wiki/BrokenSoundDrivers it seems that the snd-intel-hda driver is broken. There is a patch for Fedora here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485734 Is this patch in any of the mainline kernels? How do we get this patch in Ubuntu? ** Bug watch added: Red

[Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-06-02 Thread Jared Wiltshire
OK I believe the patches are in the 2.6.30 series kernels or you can build the latest ALSA kernel drivers from http://www.alsa- project.org/main/index.php/Download To build the ALSA kernel drivers you should just have to do ./configure --with-cards=hda-intel make sudo make install-modules --

[Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-05-25 Thread Dave Gilbert
Seen this also on Karmic: (Note I'm running with option snd-hda-intel position_fix=2 ) May 25 12:21:39 davros pulseaudio[19156]: alsa-util.c: snd_pcm_avail() returned a value that is exceptionally large: 16140901064495857628 bytes (384307168202 ms). May 25 12:21:39 davros pulseaudio[19156]:

[Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-05-09 Thread Jarkko Lietolahti
** Attachment added: pulseaudio - 2 pulse.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26495654/pulse.txt -- snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-05-09 Thread Jarkko Lietolahti
Testing with: aplay /usr/share/sounds/alsa/* Which almost always hangs during playback. jar...@gandalf:~$ aplay /usr/share/sounds/alsa/* Toistetaan WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/alsa/Front_Center.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little Endian, Taajuus 48000 Hz, Mono Toistetaan WAVE

[Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-05-09 Thread Jarkko Lietolahti
jar...@gandalf:~$ pulseaudio W: pid.c: Stale PID file, overwriting. E: alsa-util.c: snd_pcm_avail() returned a value that is exceptionally large: 13835058055282163616 bytes (418293516410 ms). E: alsa-util.c: Most likely this is a bug in the ALSA driver 'snd_hda_intel'. Please report this issue

[Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-05-09 Thread Jarkko Lietolahti
I: memblock.c: Pool full I: memblock.c: Pool full I: memblock.c: Pool full I: memblock.c: Pool full I: memblock.c: Pool full I: memblock.c: Pool full keeps repeating forever -- snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374010 You received

[Bug 374010] Re: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large:

2009-05-09 Thread Jarkko Lietolahti
Ops, missed these from pulseaudio output: W: module-combine.c: [Simultaneous output on HDA Intel] sample rates too different, not adjusting (44100 vs. 8270). W: module-combine.c: [Simultaneous output on HDA Intel] sample rates too different, not adjusting (44100 vs. 23481). W: module-combine.c: