[Bug 378646] Re: Conflicts in font name because of different implementations

2012-08-10 Thread Pander
** Tags added: fonts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378646 Title: Conflicts in font name because of different implementations To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 378646] Re: Conflicts in font name because of different implementations

2011-12-15 Thread Pander
from upstream issue: Chris Liddell 2011-12-15 16:26:47 UTC Ghostscript has reverted to the pristine URW fonts: http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commit;h=ea9a9517 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 378646] Re: Conflicts in font name because of different implementations

2009-05-21 Thread Pander
Please reread the thread. The situation is (in short) that the current fonts in gsfonts needs to be fased out and be replaced by the original fonts from ghostscript since the extra glyphs in gsfonts are below quality and will never be merged upstream. -- Conflicts in font name because of

[Bug 378646] Re: Conflicts in font name because of different implementations

2009-05-21 Thread Pander
Or at least the fonts in gsfonts have to get different id and names, so not to conflict with the original version. -- Conflicts in font name because of different implementations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378646 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 378646] Re: Conflicts in font name because of different implementations

2009-05-20 Thread Pander
One of the specific GNU/Linux problems is that the paths in defoma hint files are hardcoded to the gsfonts files, which might not be the ones you intent to use. The hardcoding is all right, just the gsfonts need to get upgraded (and renamed) to upstream. -- Conflicts in font name because of