[Bug 387043] Re: osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages

2010-06-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package osm-gps-map - 0.2-0ubuntu1.1 --- osm-gps-map (0.2-0ubuntu1.1) jaunty-proposed; urgency=low * Two patches to fix python module locations (LP: #387043) * 01_correct-python-package-location-configure.dpatch This patch fixes the configure

[Bug 387043] Re: osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages

2010-06-13 Thread Andreas Wenning
Fix confirmed. After installing the package from jaunty proposed, the test-script shows a map (instead of simply giving a module not found error). -- osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387043 You received this bug

[Bug 387043] Re: osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages

2010-06-13 Thread Martin Pitt
** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 387043] Re: osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages

2010-04-29 Thread Martin Pitt
Anyone who can test the proposed package? If not, the proposed update will be removed again. Thanks! -- osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 387043] Re: osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages

2010-01-07 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/jaunty-proposed/osm-gps-map -- osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 387043] Re: osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages

2010-01-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
Accepted into karmic-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Tags added: verification-needed ** Changed

[Bug 387043] Re: osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages

2010-01-01 Thread Benjamin Drung
This bug report dropped from the sponsor's radar. It's uploaded now. -- osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 387043] Re: osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages

2009-11-23 Thread Andrew Gee
New patch with corrections ** Attachment added: osmgpsmap-jauntypatch2.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35983309/osmgpsmap-jauntypatch2.debdiff -- osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387043 You received this bug

[Bug 387043] Re: osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages

2009-11-23 Thread John Dong
ACK from MOTU-SRU -- proceed to get your debdiff uploaded to jaunty- proposed. Thanks! P.S. For future reference, it's generally not encouraged to add a patchsys as a part of a SRU. -- osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages

[Bug 387043] Re: osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages

2009-09-05 Thread Julien Lavergne
Thanks for your work. Some comments : - the release should be jaunty-proposed because it should be uploaded to jaunty-proposed for testing before. - the version should be 0.2-0ubuntu1.1 because it's a SRU. - also, you need motu-sru ACK before uploading (see

[Bug 387043] Re: osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages

2009-08-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/osm-gps-map -- osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 387043] Re: osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages

2009-07-03 Thread Andreas Moog
** Also affects: osm-gps-map (Ubuntu Jaunty) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 387043] Re: osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages

2009-07-02 Thread Andrew Gee
A minimal patch for the stable jaunty release of osm-gps-map is attached ** Summary changed: - [jaunty] Python bindings placed in wrong directory + osmgpsmap python bindings placed in site-packages rather than dist-packages ** Description changed: - When the migration from python 2.5 to 2.6