This is fixed in Intrepid; there's now a server seed containing ubuntu-
serverguide, and it's installed by default.
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this
Closing the ubuntu-docs task, as this bug needs to be fixed in ubuntu-
meta.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Invalid
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Closing the ubuntu-docs task, as this bug needs to be fixed in ubuntu-
meta.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Invalid
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Reopening this bug, as per Steve's comment at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-
docs/+bug/45944/comments/36 it should be possible to seed ubuntu-
serverguide for intrepid now that there is a server seed.
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Confirmed
Reopening this bug, as per Steve's comment at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-
docs/+bug/45944/comments/36 it should be possible to seed ubuntu-
serverguide for intrepid now that there is a server seed.
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Confirmed
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Steve Langasek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems there's discussion of having a base server seed for other
reasons (c.f. recent discussion of w3m on the ubuntu-devel list), in
which case it's probably worth getting the Ubuntu Server Guide seeded
there?
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:49:31 -
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems there's discussion of having a base server seed for other
reasons (c.f. recent discussion of w3m on the ubuntu-devel list), in
which case it's probably worth getting the Ubuntu Server Guide seeded
there?
That
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:49:31 -
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems there's discussion of having a base server seed for other
reasons (c.f. recent discussion of w3m on the ubuntu-devel list), in
which case it's probably worth getting the Ubuntu Server Guide seeded
there?
That
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Steve Langasek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems there's discussion of having a base server seed for other
reasons (c.f. recent discussion of w3m on the ubuntu-devel list), in
which case it's probably worth getting the Ubuntu Server Guide seeded
there?
It seems there's discussion of having a base server seed for other
reasons (c.f. recent discussion of w3m on the ubuntu-devel list), in
which case it's probably worth getting the Ubuntu Server Guide seeded
there?
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
We can mark as fix release correct for the Ubuntu doc side of things?
THanks,
Jonathan
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.
--
We can mark as fix release correct for the Ubuntu doc side of things?
THanks,
Jonathan
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Pushing for a conclusion...?
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Pushing for a conclusion...?
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
The patch for 159371 has been uploaded, so I believe this bug should now
be considered resolved (or at least as resolved as it's going to get for
hardy).
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
That seems reasonable enough. Since we apparently can't distinguish the
server version from the desktop version this general message is a reasonable
pointer to the relevant docs.
This does not resolve the issue of the guide not being available to people
experiencing problems with their network
Another option would be to add details on how to install the local
package and view it in the motd.
I'd rather opt for this option.
That seems to be bug #159371, then. Does the patch at the end of that
bug address this issue to everyone's satisfaction?
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve Langasek (vorlon)
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Another option would be to add details on how to install the local
package and view it in the motd.
I'd rather opt for this option.
That seems to be bug #159371, then. Does the patch at the end of that
bug address this issue to everyone's satisfaction?
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed
Works for me.
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Tags added: serverguide
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Adam Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
For me the deciding factor is, will the documentation on the web site be
updated on launch day?
From experience it will take at least some time, although we might be
better organised than previous releases,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 08:10:13AM -, Matthew East wrote:
If it will take some time before the site is
updated than I think the package should be installed by default and the
motd updated with instructions on viewing the local docs.
Another option would be to add details on how to
I may be a bit slow, but what is the Ubuntu Server Edition? I see there
is a separate cd for -server on releases.ubuntu.com - there is no way to
control what packages are in that?
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug
http://www.ubuntu.com/products/WhatIsUbuntu/serveredition is Ubuntu
Server Edition
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Mads Peter Rommedahl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.ubuntu.com/products/WhatIsUbuntu/serveredition is Ubuntu
Server Edition
Yes, I was aware of that! That's not quite what I meant by my question
- please read it in context with previous comments.
--
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Mathias Gug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As of now, the ubuntu-server cd is setup to install the packages from
the ubuntu-standard seed. So the server install can be viewed as a
subset of the desktop install. Packages that are shipped by the server
cd are defined
As of now, the ubuntu-server cd is setup to install the packages from
the ubuntu-standard seed. So the server install can be viewed as a
subset of the desktop install. Packages that are shipped by the server
cd are defined with the server-ship seed. So there are packages on the
server cd that are
Hello,
For me the deciding factor is, will the documentation on the web site be
updated on launch day? If it will take some time before the site is
updated than I think the package should be installed by default and the
motd updated with instructions on viewing the local docs.
Personally I look
Triaging and milestoning
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
Status: New = Confirmed
Target: None = ubuntu-8.04
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you
There isn't any ubuntu-server seed. Installing the serverguide package
by default would require the creation of an specific seed, just to
install one package.
It would also go against the principle to install a minimal set of
packages for ubuntu-server. The serverguide package is not required on
I'll add ubuntu-meta to the bug tasks, as that package provides the
seeds as far as I know.
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Is ubuntu-serverguide seeded yet in the standard ubuntu-server install?
** Also affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:13:34PM -, Nicolas Valcárcel wrote:
add by hand the packages they want, and IMHO i will be very disappointed
of ubuntu if the minimal installation includes such things as lynx or
w3m.
The ubuntu-standard seed has the w3m text browser. Thus the default
install of
Reopening. For gutsy, the ubuntu-serverguide is on the server cd but not
installed by default.
We'd probably need to modify the server cd seed.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Triaged
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
Was it removed for a reason?
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 07:37:19PM -, Matthew East wrote:
Was it removed for a reason?
I don't know. I'm not sure that the server guide was added to the
default installation. It was added to the server cd in February
Interesting. It isn't clear to me that there is a single tasksel option that
is shared by all server installs. The ubuntu-seeds STRUCTURE file has the
server-ship seed (for what gets on the cd I guess) and then stuff like
lamp-server and dns-server for specific tasks. I guess we could use a
If we want to follow links, info is the correct way i think
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-serverguide should probably also depend on a textual browser,
like w3m or lynx, rather than firefox. lynx seems to offer more
obvious help than w3m, though it is optional while w3m is standard,
so I'm curious about that. And I don't know which does a better job
with multiple languages.
Hmmm. Yeah. Server admins may be nervous about network clients like
lynx and w3m on their machines.
Info doesn't (yet? :-) seem to have those risks, and has nice help at
the top of the screen, and an index of local help topics. It can also
dump info to plain text, and it is really small. And
If it's included by default it MUST be in plain text format, because
most of the server-admins prefer to use minimal installations and then
add by hand the packages they want, and IMHO i will be very disappointed
of ubuntu if the minimal installation includes such things as lynx or
w3m.
--
On the other hand, it isn't clear how well the texinfo format and info
command handle multiple languages and translations.
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a
The ubuntu-serverguide package is now in the repositories and has been
seeded for server installations for Feisty.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
Ubuntu Server Guide Not Installed On Servers
https://launchpad.net/bugs/45944
--
ubuntu-bugs
Subscribing ubuntu-server team - what do you think guys? If we supply
you with the Ubuntu Server Guide[1] in html form, are you able to whip
up a package to ship it by default with servers?
[1] Current draft at http://doc.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/serverguide/C/
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
45 matches
Mail list logo
