[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2020-04-06 Thread James Cuzella
Still seems to be an issue in modern Ubuntu 18.04.4 bionic LTS. The upstream Apple source for HFS+ projects can be found here: https://opensource.apple.com/source/hfs/ https://opensource.apple.com/source/diskdev_cmds/ Debian package for hfsprogs seems woefully out of date (based on macOS 10.4

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2013-12-12 Thread bj-rn
Is there any way to get the driver (Ubuntu 13.10 saucy / Kernel 3.13-rc1) without having to compile it myself? tia b -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49052 Title: no hfs+ journal

Re: [Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2013-12-12 Thread michael
Just updated for kernel 3.11 api I should be uploading new packing within the week. These are actually source packages which dkms compiles and installs. Any system with at least kernel 3.2 should be able to use any package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2013-08-12 Thread michael
Its reasonably stable only journaling aspects are different from mainline. Also I have attempted to fix problems with drivers bigger than four TB the would result in corruption of the file system. The fix came from an a proposal the upstream mailing list a while back not sure where things went

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2013-08-10 Thread Loren M. Lang
Is there any recommended torture test for this or is it pretty solid at the moment? I'll be getting a new MacBook Pro to play with that I'll make sure can triple boot and can test this with. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2013-05-14 Thread Ali
Does it support writing a journal or does it still deactivate journaling after replaying? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49052 Title: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets

Re: [Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2013-05-14 Thread michael
On May 14, 2013 10:06 AM, Ali i_h...@mac.com wrote: Does it support writing a journal or does it still deactivate journaling after replaying? It has full read/write support for journaling. I updated the code from an abandoned project to work with the new kernel ABI. Don't remember who was

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2013-05-13 Thread Ali
Does anyone here have access to reopen http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/5878/ ? Every time someone posts a request for HFS+ Journaled on brainstorm, it gets marked as a duplicate of this 'implemented' feature. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

Re: [Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2013-05-13 Thread michael
Actually the driver for this is ready for testing. If there's no issues I'm going to see about getting the code into the kernel. Currently this is a dkms module with its own repository. At https://launchpad.net/hfsplusdkms. It should work with kernel 3.0-3.8 -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2013-01-04 Thread michael
I've have created a project page at https://launchpad.net/hfsplusdkms release notes and source tar balls will be posted there. Please report issues there. Also the package for precise should work for quantal and oneiric as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2012-12-20 Thread michael
Quantal and oneiric can now build the dkms module. The kernel version is detected at compile time using #if conditions the adjust for abi changes. All users of the module also get driver support for blessing hfs+ volumes to mark them bootable. This was intruded by mainline in kernel 3.5. The new

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2012-12-17 Thread michael
Probably didn't compile there's been a a few ABI changes. I'll try to get a oneiric copy up soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49052 Title: no hfs+ journal write support by default

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2012-12-15 Thread Timothy Kross
I would be able to test it if you make oneiric packages, I installed the one for precise in your ppa and it still wouldn't mount rw (even after a restart and trying to mount it using the mount command). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2012-12-13 Thread michael
Source packages for the driver are now on my ppa. ppa:reeves-87/hfsplus-dkms -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49052 Title: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2012-05-21 Thread michael
I have upload source code to https://code.launchpad.net/~reeves-87/+junk /hfsplus-dkms. It does not currently journal the drive once its mounted but will init/replay the existing journal as needed. The mount is read/write by default. The source has support for dkms but should as part of the kernel

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2012-04-04 Thread michael
I have working test driver that can detect an empty journal on mount read/write in this case but without journaling support. I also found complete but not yet fully tested code for fully supporting hfs+ journaling http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/56609. I haven't even compiled

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2012-04-04 Thread Elijah Lynn
That is great Michael! If you need any testers let me know. I am sure we will be dealing with Macs for a long time to come and this would be a huge asset to the GNU/Linux toolbox! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2012-04-03 Thread Elijah Lynn
Good to know Michael. This could be a pretty huge feature for Mac converts who want to test out the waters. I have a bunch of Mac drives I used for lots of stuff over the past 3-4 years and as a former mac user, that was my strategy. I have since switched full on to Ubuntu and am planning on

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2012-03-05 Thread michael
I actually haven't been doing much with it. I have started putting code in place to at least tell if the journal is empty or not. This would be the first step. I'll put up a code patch for this first. I haven't yet read the specs for actually recording and re-playing transactions. The fallowing

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2012-03-04 Thread Elijah Lynn
Michael, did you make any progress on this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49052 Title: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only) To manage notifications

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2011-06-16 Thread michael
patch withdrawn. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed ** Patch removed: Mount read/write default patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/49052/+attachment/1748846/+files/supper.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2011-03-23 Thread michael
Actually I just got an e-mail out. I'll let you know when I hear more. I'm go to leave the default alone until journaled hfs+ is supported properly. This way we get a complete resolution to the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2011-03-22 Thread Alexander Gabriel
Did you get in contact with upstream Micheal? What did they say? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49052 Title: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only) --

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2011-03-22 Thread Alexander Gabriel
Sadly there is not much I can do. Here is a link to the specification of HFS+ (since this bug is marked as incomplete). http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#technotes/tn/tn1150.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2011-02-16 Thread Steve Conklin
Michael, The MAINTAINERS file lists the following contacts for fs/hfsplus, I would suggest asking them: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org **

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2011-01-19 Thread Andy Whitcroft
@michael -- changing that default sounds pretty dangerous to me, I note that using the force option you can override this an mount them if you wish; which seems like an appropriate default to me. Is there a reason that this is not acceptable? The kernel team is unlikely to be happy changing that

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2011-01-19 Thread michael
@Andy Whitcroft Now that I'm thinking about it I don't know why I changed it in the first place. I'm going to get in touch with the upstream maintain about actually getting journaled hfsplus support implemented. Where can I find contact information? -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2010-11-29 Thread michael
I have no idea why this was marked as implemented because it isn't. Also I don't know why they aren't mounted read/write non-journeled by default in light of Apple's own documentation at http://support.apple.com/kb/ht2355: Journaled file system is part of a set of incremental enhancements to

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2010-11-29 Thread michael
I have no idea why this was marked as implemented because it isn't. Also I don't know why they aren't mounted read/write non-journeled by default in light of Apple's own documentation at support.apple.com/kb/ht2355: Journaled file system is part of a set of incremental enhancements to the

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2010-11-29 Thread michael
This patch does not implement journaling but switches the driver to mount such volumes read/write by default. As Apple's own documentation explicitly states there is no danger in this beyond what is created by disabling journaling. ** Patch added: Mount read/write default patch

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2010-11-29 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: patch -- no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49052 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2010-11-04 Thread Dave Ahlswede
I think it would be very worth it to spend some effort on this-- currently the only journalled filesystem writable by all three major OSes is NTFS. If we could have this on Linux, it would make for a second one. (and one that's slightly unix-friendlier) -- no hfs+ journal write support by

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2010-09-25 Thread Elijah Lynn
Ubuntu Brainstorm says this was implemented in April 10'. http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/5878/ I have installed hfsplus hfsutil hfsprogs and libhfsp0 and I have had no luck getting a Journaled HFS+ filesystem to let me write on it. I am running the latest beta of Meerkat. -- no hfs+

Re: [Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2010-09-25 Thread Przemysław Kulczycki
AFAIK, the hfsplus driver hasn't been updated since 2 years (the developer didn't work on it since), so I guess we're still stuck with read-only HFS+, or forced to disable journalling on the HFS filesys -- Forwarded message -- From: Elijah Lynn eli...@eliscloud.com Date: 25

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2010-09-19 Thread Blaisorblade
@laelfrog: this bug is not Ubuntu-specific at all; the author of the code (Roman ZIppel) probably wrote that warning because he was not sure that the code is safe when writing on a journaled partition. The problem is writing on the journal - you can disable journaling on the FS, which decreases

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2010-06-30 Thread laelfrog
This bug is still present in Lucid Lynx. Why isn't read/write hfsplus on a journaled partition enabled by default? Why wouldn't you 'force'? What about it is risky? -- no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49052 You received this

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2010-02-05 Thread Patrik Dufresne
Any other activity for this bugs ? I'm wondering if we can just tell the user about the 'warning' of journaling ans let him click 'force' button to force mounting the file system. -- no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49052 You

[Bug 49052] Re: no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only)

2010-01-06 Thread Przemysław Kulczycki
** Summary changed: - no hfs+ journal write support (gets mounted as read only) + no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only) -- no hfs+ journal write support by default (gets mounted as read only) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49052 You received this bug notification