I guess bug #1475676 would be the logical consequence here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555852
Title:
Make it possible to use ULOG instead of LOG
To manage notifications about
This was never fixed because ipv6 ULOG support was removed from
netfilter and thus making ULOG a non-starter for ufw.
** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Branch linked: lp:~jdstrand/ufw/ufw-ulog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555852
Title:
Make it possible to use ULOG instead of LOG
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
@Jamie any word yet on ulog?
THANKS
--
Make it possible to use ULOG instead of LOG
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555852
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
No progress has been made, but support is still planned. Patches are
welcome. :)
--
Make it possible to use ULOG instead of LOG
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555852
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
How long would it really take to implement this?
I would of seriously thought, even for one individual developer, working
on this as their own personal project that this wouldn't even take a few
days.
As big as the development team is at Ubuntu I don't get why someone
can't jump on this, after
THANKS Jamie, how far off are we from getting ulogd support?
--
Make it possible to use ULOG instead of LOG
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555852
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Yes please allow ULOG! :)
There is no rsyslog file listed in the
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/ufw/0.30pre1-0ubuntu2/+files/ufw_0.30pre1.orig.tar.gz
If it is I don't see it, why isn't this packed with the source to use?
THANKS
--
Make it possible to use ULOG instead of LOG
Actually I use Slackware which uses syslogd so anyway to change that
20-ufw.conf for me over to what Slackware uses so I can get ugw to log
to it's own file?
THANKS
--
Make it possible to use ULOG instead of LOG
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555852
You received this bug notification because
@SAR,
The rsyslog file is in doc/rsyslog.example.
--
Make it possible to use ULOG instead of LOG
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555852
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
@ Jamie Slackware uses syslogd so this isn't going to help and I don't
want to change loggers.
Please add support for ULOG...
After all this is suppose to be a script that the end-user Admin/root
should be able to change and edit and simply change the logging section
in user.rules from -j LOG to
I just found this Ubuntu Documentation for Firewalls shows under the
'Logs' section towards the bottom that ulogd can be used which makes it
look like they are not just talking about other firewalls but ufw, since
towards the top of this section ufw is the one being mentioned.
@ SAR,
Yes, support for ulogd is planned. I also accept patches. :) Regarding
the server guide, it is just not organized particularly well. In
general, it talks about ufw first and iptables second but in the logging
section it isn't as clear as it could be which is which. Feel free to
file a bug
ULOG would be nice, though I might point out ufw 0.30 in Ubuntu 10.04
ships with an rsyslog file for separating this out and it automatically
logs to /var/log/ufw.log. rsyslog is the default syslog daemon in 10.04.
For backwards compatibility, ufw continues to log to kern, but this can
be changed
Jamie, it's true that I'm currently using syslog-ng, but is that going
to make a difference to what appears in dmesg? I'm most interested in
not having dmesg output polluted with firewall logging.
--
Make it possible to use ULOG instead of LOG
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555852
You received
No it don't think it would affect dmesg, which is why I marked it as
'Triaged' and 'Wishlist', so that support can be added in the future.
--
Make it possible to use ULOG instead of LOG
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555852
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Great, thanks.
--
Make it possible to use ULOG instead of LOG
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555852
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
18 matches
Mail list logo
