Should I be seeing this issue now in oneric?
I have filed a bug here and want to check if this is a duplicate.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/985169
BR
Subbu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I had rebooted my desktop since the time that I posted the last log:
The latest values are:
glxinfo | grep GLX version
GLX version: 1.4
cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_gem_objects
655 objects, 657907712 bytes
326 [306] objects, 96661504 [73461760] bytes in gtt
15 [12] active objects,
Any thoughts? Help?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
Title:
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
As far as I can see, this happens only for certain kernel
configurations. I am currently running a custom 2.6.36, and everything
seems fine. But a while ago I when did some experiments with kernel
options, I found cases where the leak was there. I did not report this
because I could not find out
@Rakosi, Roberto, and FAJALOU - if you are using a laptop you may be
encountering bug #569273.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
Title:
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
--
I second Matt...but with a few differences.
I am running Linux lrc-laptop 2.6.32-26-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 24
09:00:03 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux
Lenovo thinkpad sl410, with an intel graphics card.
After a few suspends, /usr/bin/X :0 vt7 -nr -nolisten tcp -auth
/var/run/xauth/A:0-26HBac
This still seems to be a problem in recent kernel versions (KMS
enabled)!
Oddly, with kernel 2.6.33, everything seems fine (lucid + ppa kde and
all xorg variants, including xorg-edgers on a Thinkpad T500, i915).
But with every version from 2.6.34 up to 2.6.36-rc4 I have tried, there
clearly is a
Rafael: As you can see above, this bug has been fixed. Please report a
new bug.
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Greetings to everyone. I still have the memory leak problem, but only
when compiz is on. I have a ATI Raden HD 3200 in a HP dv5-1022la. If
compiz is off then memory usage is around 300MB, but when compiz is on,
memory usage increments to 900MB.
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
please fill a new bug!
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
It is already reported and marked as a duplicate of this bug
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
The object bytes count does not drop for me, it keeps growing and
growing on fully updated Ubuntu 10.04. Closing applications never drops
the count. Maybe not exactly the same bug, but the symptomps looks
exactly like the original.
The 2GB of RAM and most swap gets full at around 5-7 days of
This particular bug is *definitely* fixed. It's entirely possible that
there are other, unrelated, memory issues in the server, or specific
drivers. These should be filed as separate bugs - although memory
issues often end up being problems in the apps using X :).
If I close vinagre, it
Hi,
I'm using the final version of Lucid on an Asus Eee PC 1005HA with intel 945
graphics card. I don't usually use compiz, but I think I've encountered a
similar situation to what this bug describes with vinagre. After using vinagre
to access a vnc server for a couple of hours, the system
I think not yet :S:S
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Yes, this bug has been fixed.
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I installed the final version of Lucid. I have 1gb of ram, the normal
memory usage is about 30%, but after 2 hours now is 60%. Everything is
closed, if I view the top applications, isn't anything that could be a
reason for this memory usage.
direct rendering: Yes
server glx vendor string: SGI
This bug is now officially fixed or not jet?
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you
Sorry! Newb misclick!
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Fix Released = In Progress
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug
Now that this bug has been tracked down and corrected, can we consider
reinstating the performance enhancement patches that were dropped in
xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.13.0-1ubuntu5 as an attempt to fix this bug?
Or do they depend on GLX 1.4?
See
Hello,
I think I am also affected by this bug although I have GLX ver 1.2. Here are
some outputs:
va...@vasia-laptop:~$ grep object bytes /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects
78479360 object bytes
va...@vasia-laptop:~$ glxinfo | grep GLX version
GLX version: 1.2
va...@vasia-laptop:~$ uname -a
VasiaUVI: if you have glx 1.2 then you are NOT affected by this bug,
please file a new bug with 'ubuntu-bug xorg'
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ch...@chris-desktop:~$ glxinfo | grep glx version
server glx version string: 1.4
client glx version string: 1.4
ch...@chris-desktop:~$ X -version
X.Org X Server 1.7.6
Release Date: 2010-03-17
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.24-25-server i686 Ubuntu
Current
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you
Works for me(tm)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME
Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
Also fixes netbook-launcher startup
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are
Conn O Griofa, I never said that the patch works at your computer.
Read what you've written: Although the initial feedback from most
people seems to indicate that the proposed update fixes the issue, I
haven't seen anybody post output that would positively confirm the leak
as being fixed
I just
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you
I've updated a couple of hours ago. This bug has gone, but now xorg
sometimes crashes and gets me back to the kdm login screen.It hasn't
been so before.
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
alex you should open a new bug report (even if you believe that it is the patch
mentioned here that caused your problem).
Open a console and type this:
ubuntu-bug xserver-xorg
There are certain attachments you should send when reporting problems
like this (this list is taken form
alex I forgot to mention this in my previous post, but you should
probably mention this bug report in your newly created bug report and
also come back here and tell us the bug number of the report, in case
someone else following this bug has the same problems as you do.
--
[KMS] gem objects not
I have dual core processor. CPU1 and CPU2. I always get 100% CPU usage
in either of the CPU usage but not at the same time. When CPU1 goes to
100%, CPU2 lowers to about 44%. then when CPU2 rises to 100%, CPU1
lowers down to about 47%.
Is this related also to this Xorg bug?
NVIDIA non-free is
Petar,
You clearly implied that I was misinterpreting my results in the first
sentence of comment #37. In comment #59, I acknowledged that your system
appears not to have the same memory leak issue; as I said, your
allocation increases /and/ decreases, unlike my own. I asked for
evidence simply
Is there any reason for xserver-xorg not being updated in the official
repository, or is it that the mirror server I'm getting updates from
hasn't been updated yet?
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a
hi people,
I wanted to give you an update on my terminal-Output some minutes ago.
Hier is the Output:
and...@andrea-desktop:~$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object
bytes'
458080256 object bytes
and...@andrea-desktop:~$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects
2037 objects
Linuxexperte is this with xserver-xorg packages from the official Lucid
repository or with xserver-xorg packages from
https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates?
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification
While reading this bug report I ran looked at
/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects on my own computer. I got:
7681 objects
-1325842432 object bytes
6 pinned
12771328 pin bytes
108036096 gtt bytes
201326592 gtt total
I do not believe that the negative number is correct, but I am unable to
tell if
Alexander Bürger you are hit by the bug. The number is negative because
object bytes uses signed integer to store its value (I came to this
conclusion on my own, so sorry if that is not correct). And because
there is a leak, and the number never decreases, it reaches a point when
the number
The fix is released now, thanks for all of the testing everyone and if
you still have problems please file a new bug about it with ubuntu-bug
xorg so your logs can be examined deeper.
xorg-server (2:1.7.6-2ubuntu7) lucid; urgency=low
* Drop 117_fix_crash_with_createglyphset.patch
- Dupe of
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
hello people,
I just heard of this today. So I just want to know if I am also affected or not.
I put this command into the Terminal: cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects
The output is this:
cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects
1688 objects
241090560 object bytes
3 pinned
13705216 pin bytes
Linuxexperte [2010-04-22 15:38 -]:
241090560 object bytes
This is quite much, but in the end it's really noticeable if you are
affected -- after a few hours your system becomes totally sluggish and
feels like a tar pit. On my system, shutdown took about a minute, too.
Can anybody give me
Martin,
Although the initial feedback from most people seems to indicate that
the proposed update fixes the issue, I haven't seen anybody post output
that would positively confirm the leak as being fixed (in other words,
that the GEM object byte allocation is actually reducing when
applications
Linuxexperte [2010-04-22 15:38 -]:
241090560 object bytes
229MB is a perfectly reasonable amount to expect there and not
indicative of a leak, if on the other hand you see it at 1GB+ after a
few more hours uptime then you know you have problems.
As a side note, the x-updates packages are
Conn O Griofa,
pe...@aurora:~$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object bytes'
160043008 object bytes
pe...@aurora:~$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object bytes'
160456704 object bytes
pe...@aurora:~$ oowriter
[1] 21973
pe...@aurora:~$ cat
Here is anothe one that might be more clear:
pe...@aurora:~$ date ; cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object
bytes'
Thu Apr 22 20:08:31 CEST 2010
164847616 object bytes
pe...@aurora:~$ oowriter
[1] 2189
pe...@aurora:~$ date ; cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects | grep 'object
Bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565903 likewise suggests a downgrade
to glx 1.2 would resolve some corruption issues.
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Well, downgrading to glx 1.2 seems to be the best idea then. Only very
few apps seem to be affected and people that use binary blobs are not
affected at all. On the other hand the downgrade fixes some corruption
issues.
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
I see the same behaviour in Kubuntu with KWIN effects enables.
Question:ù
in an eventual downgrade to glx 1.2 and such, how much performance loss shall
we expect on lower end intel GMA netbooks ?
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug
Question:ù
in an eventual downgrade to glx 1.2 and such, how much performance loss shall
we expect on lower end intel GMA netbooks ?
None
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I observe the same behaviour in Karmic:
$ for t in `seq 1 10`; do eog /usr/share/backgrounds ; echo `grep object
bytes /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects` `ps --noheaders ocomm,vsz,rss
$(pidof X)`; done
374431744 object bytes Xorg 250080 96968 Xorg 163408 15644
393375744 object bytes Xorg
I forgot to mention: I have Compiz enabled.
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Description changed:
[Problem]
Memory leak. Fix to glx 1.4 backport did not deallocate gem objects properly.
[Background]
Red Hat backported glx 1.3 and 1.4 support from xserver 1.8. These patches
were taken by Debian as patches 03_fedora_glx_versioning.diff and
Michał Gołębiowski the test you've done by itself shows nothing. Please
read my previous posts!
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Petar Volkovski,
What you did in comment #51 is just another variation of the testcase in
the bug description that others have been performing (and that you
insist does not represent a memory leak).
Your output differs from mine in that the GEM allocation increases *and*
decreases. I have never
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Is this bug fixed? I am waiting for this package to come in the repos.
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I think there is a slight possibility of mixing multiple slowdown bugs
here. If you experience slowdown and suspect it might not all be because
of GEM objects, please glance at bug #95 which was reported before
xorg-server ubuntu2 with the 114 patch went in, and claims that
2.6.32-19 kernel
So I have 2:1.7.6-2ubuntu7~xup2 packages from
ppa:ubuntu-x-swat/x-updates and it worked fine in the beginning and
seemed to help with the problem, but now I'm seeing 60%+ CPU (of one of
the two cores) being used in the Xorg process; laptop gets hot.
Nothing in xorg.log, nothing in
I stupidly tried stracing Xorg from a xterm on top of Xorg tsss :)
What's the proper way to look into the CPU consumption issue next time I
hit it? (just froze my laptop and had to reboot because of the strace,
so CPU is back to normal ATM)
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
BTW otherwise things seemed to be stable WRT memory consumption, but
only ran it for some hours, might not be enough.
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Just as Feedback: with the xup2 packages I have no memory leak. Compiz
Performance is OK, before using the Packages from the PPA I had a choppy
Performance while watching Videos in Fullscreen. This has gone with the
updated Packages and runs smooth now.
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
For whatever it's worth, even if nothing at all, I've had the test setup
in VMware Workstation with 3D acceleration turned on, host card is an
ATI Radeon HD 4850. It seems okay, I let it go for around the past 15
hours and memory usage is fine. I realize VMs do their own things
sometimes though.
I test this package now
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Just confirming that Robert's xorg packages (2ubuntu7~xup2) have fixed
the issue I mentioned in #564636. So far no stability issues. I will
report back on whether it fixes the ATI GPU issue when I get the chance
to test that.
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
Preliminary testing shows that Robert's xorg packages from
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates fix this bug for
me too. (Intel graphic)
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Robert, from the current discussion it seems that it's quite safe to
roll back the two glx 1.4 and the 114 patch. Personally I would rather
like to see this fixed in final, since it's such a notable regression
and the 114 patch was just introduced a few days ago.
I heard that the rdepends were
I started a testing wiki page at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Testing/GEMLeak
I'll send a call for testing to ubuntu-de...@.
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
I added the ppa, I did the upgrade and reboot but glxinfo | grep GLX version
still says 1.4
Is it right? I ask because the wiki says Please verify that glxinfo | grep
GLX version says 1.2, not 1.4.
I've xserver-common and xserver-xorg-core 2:1.7.6-2ubuntu7~xup2 installed.
--
[KMS] gem objects
As a small note, applications requiring GLX 1.4 generally do not start
if the 1.4-specific extensions are not available. I never got to
studying which are such applications, even though it crossed my mind.
Probably games, some professional proprietary applications etc. Quite a
few applications
I caught wind of this at the forums:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=9154355posted=1#post9154355
And as I said there, Please excuse me for being a pain but being
visually impaired I can sometimes overlook the obvious, but my blind old
self can't see is how to add myself and my machine
Something possibly helpful, or not, since I'm visually impaired one of
the first things I do is right click the desktop, adjust fonts, etc, and
particularly DISABLE the 3D stuff. That is, even if enabled by default,
if Visual Effects shows Normal, I change it to None.
That's how the unaffected
Using 2ubuntu7~xup2 , I'm not having any memory problems i had reported earlier
Bug #563400 (thanks Sarvatt!)
This is on an ATI X1400 Mobility radeon [RV515]
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member
i'd like to report that I do not notice this regressions. My packages
are update. I do not use proposed ppa to downgrade glx to 1.2.
My video adapter:
VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GME965/GLE960 Integrated
Graphics Controller (rev 0c)
os: lucid lynx 10.04 32bit Desktop
OK, while installing packages on my third Lucid so I can just use it,
I browsed the apt history files of the others to see if that might shed
some light. It did to me, but it may not be helpful to you.
On my main Lucid (the one NOT affected) I'd let update mangler remove
compiz and compiz-gnome
I am running Lucid in Virtualbox with Compiz enabled. Host Machine is Nvidia.
I just ran all the updates
then rebooted and checked my version
ubu...@lucid-test:~$ glxinfo|grep version
server glx version string: 1.2 Chromium
client glx version string: 1.2 Chromium
GLX version: 1.3
OpenGL
Running Lenovo ThinkPad T400, model 6475ZN2 with the Xserver from
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates.
After rebooting and starting the new Xserver, running some 1080p video in full
screen and some other applications normally taxing the Xerver, GLX and memory
quite hard, the
** Description changed:
- Binary package hint: xorg
+ [Problem]
+ Memory leak. Fix to glx 1.4 backport did not deallocate gem objects
properly.
- There has been some buzz the last days about excessive swapping and OOM
- conditions. It can seem like the kernel memory use is increasing since
** Description changed:
[Problem]
- Memory leak. Fix to glx 1.4 backport did not deallocate gem objects
properly.
+ Memory leak. Fix to glx 1.4 backport did not deallocate gem objects properly.
[Background]
Red Hat backported glx 1.3 and 1.4 support from xserver 1.8. These patches
** Description changed:
[Problem]
Memory leak. Fix to glx 1.4 backport did not deallocate gem objects properly.
[Background]
- Red Hat backported glx 1.3 and 1.4 support from xserver 1.8. These patches
were taken by Debian as patches 03_fedora_glx_versioning.diff and
** Description changed:
[Problem]
Memory leak. Fix to glx 1.4 backport did not deallocate gem objects properly.
[Background]
- Red Hat backported glx 1.3 and 1.4 support from xserver 1.8. These patches
were taken by Debian as patches 03_fedora_glx_versioning.diff and
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 09:19:49PM -, Andy wrote:
I am running Lucid in Virtualbox with Compiz enabled. Host Machine is
Nvidia. I just ran all the updates
then rebooted and checked my version
The -nvidia binary driver includes its own GLX library, so this bug is
completely irrelevant
I've been running the beta for a couple of months,
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS,
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
and I haven't been affected either. I tried the script above to test,
but the script didn't work. Seems there's no
whoops, thought I wasn't affected, but after running a clip through vlc
for half an hour, my memory usage started to increase sharply. I'm not
sure this has always been a problem since I've been running testing for
quite awhile and watched dvds without issue a couple of times..
--
[KMS] gem
Unfortunately, this proposed X server update has not resolved the
problem on my system. I'm using a stock Ubuntu Lucid installation,
compiz enabled, and with the proposed X server update.
c...@nx9010:~$ lspci | grep VGA
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon IGP
Update on comment #33:
I managed to have a quick word with David Airlie, and he told me that
the radeon driver does not report the pinned/pin/gtt values, so that's
not an issue.
Here are some results from kernel 2.6.34-rc5 with the latest xorg-edgers
packages [1]:
c...@nx9010:~$ glxinfo | grep
Using kernel 2.6.32-21-generic and xorg-edgers packages:
After just 10 minutes uptime the slowdown has occurred, with a lower
object bytes count than before. Here is the output at the point in which
the slowdown became noticeable:
c...@nx9010:~$ pid=`pidof X` ; for t in `seq 1 10`; do eog
Final test: kernel 2.6.34-rc5 + stock drivers + proposed X server
update.
X server uptime: approximately 1 hour.
c...@nx9010:~$ glxinfo | grep GLX version
GLX version: 1.2
c...@nx9010:~$ pid=`pidof X` ; for t in `seq 1 10`; do eog
/usr/share/backgrounds ; echo `grep object bytes
Conn O Griofa I believe you are misinterpreting the results (or the
test is not reliable indication of the memory leak). This is how I know
that the patch works. I have a System Monitor active in my top panel.
Right click the System Monitor and select Memory in Monitored Resources
(if not already
Peter Velkovski,
Thanks for the suggestion, but on my system - even if I close all
applications on the running X server - the GEM object bytes value
*never* decreases. Freeing the pagecache, dentries and inodes (as you
suggest) makes no difference at any point.
The only way to reduce the
In that case I think the discussion here is relevant:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26394 and the Track DRI2
drawables as resources, not privates thread on xorg-devel ML, with four
glx commits on xserver master 2010-04-16.
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #26394
A link to the ML thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg.devel/6829/focus=7229
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) = xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Downgrading to xorg-server -2ubuntu1 does prevent the memory problems .
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
perhaps is my problem too
cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/gem_objects
3640 objects
1269358592 object bytes
4 pinned
13766656 pin bytes
111054848 gtt bytes
234881024 gtt total
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you
I think this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-
server/+bug/564636 is a duplicate of this bug
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Running xorg-edgers xserver 1.8 now with
114_dri2_make_sure_x_drawable_exists.patch dropped (thanks Sarvatt!) and
the problem can not be reproduced.
--
[KMS] gem objects not deallocated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
