This bug was fixed in the package openoffice.org - 1:3.2.0-7ubuntu4
---
openoffice.org (1:3.2.0-7ubuntu4) lucid; urgency=low
[ Michael Vogt ]
* change the way components like -evolution or -filter-binfilter are
registered so that we do not need to pre-depends on
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
unpack/configure order violation triggered by OOo pre-depends
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566584
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I pushed a possible fix to:
https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mvo/openoffice/3.2.0-lucid
--
unpack/configure order violation triggered by OOo pre-depends
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566584
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Uploading packages to (still building of course):
https://edge.launchpad.net/~mvo/+archive/openoffice
--
unpack/configure order violation triggered by OOo pre-depends
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566584
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
There is a merge proposal here:
https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mvo/openoffice/3.2.0-lucid/+merge/23875
and I uploaded a updated package to my PPA at:
https://edge.launchpad.net/~mvo/+archive/openoffice
I tested the patch and installed/removed packges and also tested karmic - lucid
openoffice
@Chris Please keep the bug open while the situation is under
investigation. I'm e.g. talking to Rene to try to figure out if
openoffice.org can be split further (into -core-core or something) so
that the pre-depends is less invasive.
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status:
I discussed a bit with Rene what could be done to avoid the pre-depends
on openoffice.org-core.
One idea I have is to add a new dir like (whatever name suits best):
/usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.2/components/
/usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.2/registered-components/
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
unpack/configure order violation triggered by OOo pre-depends
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566584
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Is there anything I should do on the openoffice.org side of things, or
just close out this bug since you are working around the apt issue in
update-manager?
Thanks,
Chris
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: New = Incomplete
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu Lucid)
** Also affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
unpack/configure order violation triggered by OOo pre-depends
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566584
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Adding a OOo task as it appears that removing that a workaround is to
redo the OOo pre-depends.
--
unpack/configure order violation triggered by OOo pre-depends
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566584
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
A alternative workaround appears to be to add a explicit libxml2
depends to the pre-depends of openoffice.org-evolution. That appears
to be a bug in the pre-depends ordering where it sometimes does not do
it recursively properly.
--
unpack/configure order violation triggered by OOo pre-depends
The workaround is only partially good, the next error is that
libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 gets configured before
libgstreamer0.10-0 is ready. So it just shifts the problem.
--
unpack/configure order violation triggered by OOo pre-depends
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566584
You received
I just tested the upgrade when force-removing openoffice.org-
evolution, openoffice.org-emailmerge, openoffice.org-filter-
binfilter and it works just fine then.
So another possible workaround is to remove them on upgrade and put them
back later (ugly, but…)
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Lucid)
14 matches
Mail list logo
