[Bug 575542] Re: resize2fs does not respect flex_bg

2019-07-24 Thread Brad Figg
** Tags added: cscc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575542 Title: resize2fs does not respect flex_bg To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 575542] Re: resize2fs does not respect flex_bg

2018-08-29 Thread Theodore Ts'o
Yes, this has been fixed quite a while ago. :-) Online resize with flex_bg was fixed in 2012 --- call with the v3.10 kernel or so. Offline resize was fixed around that time (e2fsprogs 1.43), but there have been some bugs with flex_bg and off-line resizing, so I'd recommend using at least

[Bug 575542] Re: resize2fs does not respect flex_bg

2018-08-29 Thread Phillip Susi
You haven't happened to fix this in the last 8 years have you Ted? ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575542 Title: resize2fs does not respect flex_bg To manage notifications about

[Bug 575542] Re: resize2fs does not respect flex_bg

2010-05-05 Thread Phillip Susi
Adding kernel task then and marking as triaged and low priority. ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: linux

[Bug 575542] Re: resize2fs does not respect flex_bg

2010-05-04 Thread Theodore Ts'o
This is a true statement. Getting this right will require kernel support as well as changes to e2fsprogs, since the kernel ioctl used by online resize currently assumes that the blocks used for the allocation bitmaps, et. al, are in the block group which is added. This shortcoming isn't really