[Bug 579851] Re: Samba documentation update for ubuntu-serverguide

2010-10-18 Thread Klaus Hartnegg
Hi, It is STILL wrong in the html version on the web pages, e.g. https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/samba-dc.html Btw. it would be nice if the pdf and the html versions would tell, on which revision they are based. It would be even better if they were updated more often and if some web

[Bug 579851] Re: Samba documentation update for ubuntu-serverguide

2010-08-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-docs - 10.10.1 --- ubuntu-docs (10.10.1) maverick; urgency=low * First release for maverick * General: - Update copyright year, LP: #580396 - Update version numbers for maverick, LP: #587119 - Update pot files *

[Bug 579851] Re: Samba documentation update for ubuntu-serverguide

2010-08-10 Thread Matthew East
Adam - ordinarily the process is not to update the website until the package is updated. In this case given that the PDF file has accidentally used the newer version, I would go ahead and update the html version too to avoid the inconsistency that Klaus has pointed out. -- Samba documentation

Re: [Bug 579851] Re: Samba documentation update for ubuntu-serverguide

2010-08-10 Thread Klaus Hartnegg
Am 10.08.2010 09:44, schrieb Matthew East: ordinarily the process is not to update the website until the package is updated. In this case given that the PDF file has accidentally used the newer version, I would go ahead and update the html version too to avoid the inconsistency that Klaus has

Re: [Bug 579851] Re: Samba documentation update for ubuntu-serverguide

2010-08-10 Thread Matthew East
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Klaus Hartnegg hartn...@gmx.de wrote: Am 10.08.2010 09:44, schrieb Matthew East: IMHO the severity of the problem should justify an immediate update of the package anyway. Why severe? For several reasons, each one alone should justify a fix: 1: The manual is

[Bug 579851] Re: Samba documentation update for ubuntu-serverguide

2010-06-08 Thread Klaus Hartnegg
I don't understand how this explains why the same info is updated in one variant of the manual, but not in the other. For me this looks like an automatic script has failed, not like somebody chose which bugs to fix for which release. Please note I didn't say that not all errors were fixed, I said

Re: [Bug 579851] Re: Samba documentation update for ubuntu-serverguide

2010-06-08 Thread Adam Sommer
Hello, On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Klaus Hartnegg hartn...@gmx.de wrote: I don't understand how this explains why the same info is updated in one variant of the manual, but not in the other. For me this looks like an automatic script has failed, not like somebody chose which bugs to fix

Re: [Bug 579851] Re: Samba documentation update for ubuntu-serverguide

2010-06-07 Thread Adam Sommer
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Klaus Hartnegg hartn...@gmx.de wrote: I see that this has been corrected in the PDF https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/serverguide.pdf but not in the html online version https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/windows-networking.html Will it just

[Bug 579851] Re: Samba documentation update for ubuntu-serverguide

2010-06-06 Thread Klaus Hartnegg
I see that this has been corrected in the PDF https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/serverguide.pdf but not in the html online version https://help.ubuntu.com/10.04/serverguide/C/windows-networking.html Will it just take a while until some cron job runs again, or is this an error? --

[Bug 579851] Re: Samba documentation update for ubuntu-serverguide

2010-05-16 Thread Adam Sommer
** Tags added: serverguide -- Samba documentation update for ubuntu-serverguide https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579851 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 579851] Re: Samba documentation update for ubuntu-serverguide

2010-05-16 Thread Adam Sommer
Thanks for reporting this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. I have added your suggestion to revision 512 in the Maverick branch and revision 510 in the Lucid branch. ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Assignee: