This bug was fixed in the package apache2 - 2.2.16-4ubuntu2
---
apache2 (2.2.16-4ubuntu2) natty; urgency=low
[Clint Byrum]
* Adding plymouth aware passphrase dialog program ask-for-passphrase.
(LP: #582963)
+ debian/control: apache2.2-common depends on bash for
This bug was fixed in the package apache2 - 2.2.16-4ubuntu2
---
apache2 (2.2.16-4ubuntu2) natty; urgency=low
[Clint Byrum]
* Adding plymouth aware passphrase dialog program ask-for-passphrase.
(LP: #582963)
+ debian/control: apache2.2-common depends on bash for
A bit late for Maverick now that we are passed FinalFreeze. Please
propose this again for sponsoring when Natty opens, and hopefully we'll
pick it up quicker than we did for Maverick...
--
Apport Hook
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609177
You received this bug notification because you are a
A bit late for Maverick now that we are passed FinalFreeze. Please
propose this again for sponsoring when Natty opens, and hopefully we'll
pick it up quicker than we did for Maverick...
--
Apport Hook
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609177
You received this bug notification because you are a
Thanks for the reviews. Attached is a patch against the latest version.
I put the file in the apache2.2-common.install file because the
description of apache2-common has: This package contains the
configuration and support scripts..
To me the apport hook seems like a support script. But I'm a
@Mathias: Ok, that's reasonable.
@Adam: If you have an apport hook for a binary package, it belong to the
binary package that it is for. It will be only used if you report a bug
against this binary package. In contrast a _source apport hook will be
used for all binary packages that are build from
Thanks for the reviews. Attached is a patch against the latest version.
I put the file in the apache2.2-common.install file because the
description of apache2-common has: This package contains the
configuration and support scripts..
To me the apport hook seems like a support script. But I'm a
If the .bug-script doesn't ask any questions (ie is completely non-
interactive - which I think is the case), calling the script from the
apport hook via an apport_utils command and include its output as one
field in the report seems reasonable.
--
Apport Hook
@Mathias: Ok, that's reasonable.
@Adam: If you have an apport hook for a binary package, it belong to the
binary package that it is for. It will be only used if you report a bug
against this binary package. In contrast a _source apport hook will be
used for all binary packages that are build from
The .bug-script file is for collecting bug data for Debian. I am not
sure if it can be integrated into the apport hook without huge work.
Now to the patch:
1) Please update it against the latest package version
2) Close this bug in debian/changelog
3) install needs to be called with '-D' to
The .bug-script file is for collecting bug data for Debian. I am not
sure if it can be integrated into the apport hook without huge work.
Now to the patch:
1) Please update it against the latest package version
2) Close this bug in debian/changelog
3) install needs to be called with '-D' to
Thanks for your proposal.
As there is already an apache2 hook for bug reporting
(debian/apache2.2-common.bug-script) I think it'd make more sense to
have the apport wrapper call the bug script (found in
/usr/share/bug/apache2.2-common/script) and include its output in the
report.
That way we'd
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Mathias Gug (mathiaz)
--
Apport Hook
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609177
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Thanks for your proposal.
As there is already an apache2 hook for bug reporting
(debian/apache2.2-common.bug-script) I think it'd make more sense to
have the apport wrapper call the bug script (found in
/usr/share/bug/apache2.2-common/script) and include its output in the
report.
That way we'd
Looking at the attachments in this bug report, I noticed that an
attachment was not flagged as a patch. A patch contains changes to an
Ubuntu package that will resolve a bug and this attachment is one!
Subsequently, I've checked the patch flag for it. In the future when
submitting patches please
Looking at the attachments in this bug report, I noticed that an
attachment was not flagged as a patch. A patch contains changes to an
Ubuntu package that will resolve a bug and this attachment is one!
Subsequently, I've checked the patch flag for it. In the future when
submitting patches please
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
Apport Hook
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609177
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
Apport Hook
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609177
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52369519/apache2_apport-hook.debdiff
--
Apport Hook
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609177
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52369519/apache2_apport-hook.debdiff
--
Apport Hook
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609177
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
20 matches
Mail list logo