Re: [Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-11-23 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Avery's message of Tue Nov 22 23:59:31 UTC 2011: I'm having this problem in 11.10. Shouldn't the version of dpkg on my system have this bug fixed? Yes it should be working in 11.10. Can you file a new bug, mentioning this bug # in it, against dpkg? Also come back to this bug and

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-11-22 Thread Avery
I'm having this problem in 11.10. Shouldn't the version of dpkg on my system have this bug fixed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767634 Title: dpkg regression --force-depends To

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-09-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package dpkg - 1.16.0~ubuntu7.1 --- dpkg (1.16.0~ubuntu7.1) natty-proposed; urgency=low * src/packages.c: fix use of --force-depends so that it works again for foreign arch packages. Thanks to Raphaël Hertzog for the fix. LP: #767634. *

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-09-04 Thread aplccorp
Hello. I had exactly the same problem that is described in this report. After installing the dpkg package having the proposed deposit activated, everything worked perfectly, and I was able to install my Canon MP550 on my Ubuntu 11.04 AMD64 Many thanks! APLC -- You received this bug

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-09-04 Thread Steve Langasek
thanks very much for confirming! ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767634 Title: dpkg regression --force-depends

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-08-22 Thread Steve Langasek
Could some one of the users who've subscribed to this bug please test the dpkg package in natty-proposed, and confirm whether it fixes your issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767634

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-06-29 Thread Chris Halse Rogers
Approve, please accept into natty-proposed. ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu Natty) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-06-26 Thread Steve Langasek
** Description changed: + SRU justification: + Regression in dpkg introduced by multiarch. It is not impossible to force the installation of foreign-arch packages in natty if their dependencies are not installed. + + TEST CASE: + 1. Download

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-05-31 Thread Todd A.
Has the fix been released yet Steve? I assume though if it was, you would have posted here about it -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767634 Title: dpkg regression --force-depends

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-05-12 Thread Justin Nelson
It seems that most affected by this bug are trying to install the Canon Pixma-series drivers. I've got mine working, and here's how I did it: 1. Add the line deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric main to your /etc/apt/sources.list 2. Run sudo apt-get update DO NOT APT-GET UPGRADE. I

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-05-12 Thread Justin Nelson
Actually, don't do what I just said above. While it does work, it also really, really broke APT. Don't do it! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767634 Title: dpkg regression

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-05-12 Thread Chris Sadler
Hey Guys, I've got a solution that's worked for me.. its a bit of hack but it's worked on my system and I don't think it will cause any instability for other packages, please let me know if any concerns. It's a modification of a method I saw on a fedora forum at some point... The process I

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-05-12 Thread Chris Sadler
and the mx860 specific one... ** Attachment added: cnijfilter-mx860series_3.10-1_forced_amd64.deb https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/767634/+attachment/2126347/+files/cnijfilter-mx860series_3.10-1_forced_amd64.deb -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-05-11 Thread panga
Hi Raphaël, I tried to pick the fixed package in oneiric like you adviced Jean because I have the same issue on my 11.04, but after getting the 64 bits deb of fixed dpkg, it refuses to launch because of broke dependances. Any advice ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-05-09 Thread Jean
Hi, I'm facing the same too (and I am certainly not the only one) You say the bug is fixed and released. But, my system being up to date, my dpkg version is still 1.16.0~ubuntu7. Is there anything I should do to integrate the fix as, since I upgrade to 11.04, I cannot use my printer. Or should I

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-05-09 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Jean, you can pick the fixed package in oneiric (11.10) or simply wait until Steve prepares an update for Natty (11.04). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767634 Title: dpkg regression

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-04-29 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/dpkg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767634 Title: dpkg regression --force-depends -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-04-29 Thread Steve Langasek
** Also affects: dpkg (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu Natty) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu Natty) Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-04-29 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package dpkg - 1.16.0~ubuntu8 --- dpkg (1.16.0~ubuntu8) oneiric; urgency=low * src/packages.c: fix use of --force-depends so that it works again for foreign arch packages. Thanks to Raphaël Hertzog for the fix. LP: #767634. -- Steve Langasek

Re: [Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-04-25 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Damien Laporte wrote: Raphaël Hertzog wrote on 2011-04-22: #2 Of course you still need --force-depends to get it to work. I didn't use this option with 10.10. I only used --force-architecture. So you suggest to write foreign-architecture i386 in /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-04-25 Thread Damien Laporte
But will your patch be incorporated in natty ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767634 Title: dpkg regression --force-depends -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

Re: [Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-04-25 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Damien Laporte wrote: But will your patch be incorporated in natty ? I don't know, I don't have upload rights so it's not my choice at all. Steve ? Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)

Re: [Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-04-25 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 07:57:57AM -, Raphaël Hertzog wrote: On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Damien Laporte wrote: But will your patch be incorporated in natty ? I don't know, I don't have upload rights so it's not my choice at all. Steve ? It will have to be done as an SRU rather than in natty

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-04-24 Thread Damien Laporte
Raphaël Hertzog wrote on 2011-04-22:#2 Of course you still need --force-depends to get it to work. I didn't use this option with 10.10. I only used --force-architecture. So you suggest to write foreign-architecture i386 in /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg and to use sudo dpkg -i --force-depends

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-04-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
I can confirm the problem. The patch attached should fix this. Thank you for your report. ** Attachment added: Force-depends fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/767634/+attachment/2081753/+files/patch ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress **

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-04-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Of course you still need --force-depends to get it to work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767634 Title: dpkg regression --force-depends -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-04-22 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve Langasek (vorlon) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767634 Title: dpkg regression --force-depends -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 767634] Re: dpkg regression --force-depends

2011-04-22 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767634 Title: dpkg regression --force-depends -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com