This is fixed in openafs 1.6.0~pre5-2 in oneiric.
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786088
Title:
package
Daniel Richard G. sk...@iskunk.org writes:
Ah, I see. Do you think 1.6 could make it into natty-backports, too?
It seems reasonable to me, although I personally only have Debian systems
and hence don't directly do Ubuntu development. But it definitely seems
like a reasonable target.
There is a PPA with openafs 1.6 for natty:
https://launchpad.net/~openafs/+archive/master
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786088
Title:
package openafs-modules-dkms
Bjorn, thanks for the pointer! I was not aware of this PPA. I'll be
giving it a try.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786088
Title:
package openafs-modules-dkms 1.4.14+dfsg-1+ubuntu1
Looks like the 2.6.39 kernel has no smp_lock.h header file:
# ls -1F /usr/src/
linux-headers-2.6.38-8/
linux-headers-2.6.38-8-generic/
linux-headers-2.6.39-020639/
linux-headers-2.6.39-020639-generic/
nvidia-current-270.41.06/
openafs-1.4.14/
virtualbox-ose-4.0.4/
# find /usr/src -name
Daniel Richard G. sk...@iskunk.org writes:
Looks like the 2.6.39 kernel has no smp_lock.h header file:
# ls -1F /usr/src/
linux-headers-2.6.38-8/
linux-headers-2.6.38-8-generic/
linux-headers-2.6.39-020639/
linux-headers-2.6.39-020639-generic/
nvidia-current-270.41.06/
openafs-1.4.14/
Any chance the new 1.4 upstream could go into debian-backports, and then
here? There must be a few folks on squeeze who want to run the 2.6.39
kernel.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Daniel Richard G. sk...@iskunk.org writes:
Any chance the new 1.4 upstream could go into debian-backports, and then
here? There must be a few folks on squeeze who want to run the 2.6.39
kernel.
Packages that were never in Debian testing are not eligible for
debian-backports. I'll be
Ah, I see. Do you think 1.6 could make it into natty-backports, too?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786088
Title:
package openafs-modules-dkms 1.4.14+dfsg-1+ubuntu1 failed to
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786088
Title:
package openafs-modules-dkms 1.4.14+dfsg-1+ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: openafs kernel module failed to build
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Description changed:
- This crash occurred during an unattended reboot.
+ This crash occurred during installation of the 2.6.39 mainline kernel
+ (i.e. linux-headers-*_{all,i386}.deb and linux-image-*_i386.deb).
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package:
11 matches
Mail list logo
