[Bug 923955] Re: pdftopdf filter fails to output form field values

2013-03-11 Thread Till Kamppeter
Fixed in Raring by updating QPDF to 4.0.1. ** Changed in: qpdf (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923955 Title: pdftopdf filter fails to

[Bug 923955] Re: pdftopdf filter fails to output form field values

2013-03-08 Thread Till Kamppeter
** Package changed: cups (Ubuntu) = qpdf (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923955 Title: pdftopdf filter fails to output form field values To manage notifications about this

[Bug 923955] Re: pdftopdf filter fails to output form field values

2013-03-08 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
For anyone watching, qpdf_4.0.1-2 in debian has had a fix for this problem since February 25. The patch should be easy to backport to the version in 12.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 923955] Re: pdftopdf filter fails to output form field values

2013-03-08 Thread Till Kamppeter
Jay, thanks for the info, I have found out this now, too by building the experimental package on Raring. Can you attach the patch here or post a link to it, so that I can apply it to the Quantal package? Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 923955] Re: pdftopdf filter fails to output form field values

2013-03-08 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
This patch is relative to 4.0.1. I suspect that it will apply cleanly to 3.whatever-you-have with at most offsets. The change is very localized. If you run into any problems, you can post here. I'm subscribed to this bug. ** Patch added: patch to fix this problem

[Bug 923955] Re: pdftopdf filter fails to output form field values

2013-03-08 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment patch to fix this problem of this bug report has been identified as being a patch. The ubuntu-reviewers team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review the patch. In the event that this is in fact not a patch you can resolve this situation by removing the tag

[Bug 923955] Re: pdftopdf filter fails to output form field values

2013-02-19 Thread Tobias Hoffmann
Sorry, I forgot to subscribe and did not get your comment by mail... I think a recent evince will directly send pdf (and not ps) to cups. But it will 'rewrite' quite heavily. And yes, PDF is the new internal default format in the linux printing chain. This has more to do with having the

[Bug 923955] Re: pdftopdf filter fails to output form field values

2013-02-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923955 Title:

[Bug 923955] Re: pdftopdf filter fails to output form field values

2013-02-10 Thread Adam Reichold
An Ubuntu and qpdfview user seems to have had the same problem trying to print https://service.rundfunkbeitrag.de/e360/e364/e1685/e1699/resources1700/Buergerinnen_und_Buerger_Wohnungsabmeldung_0106.pdf;. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 923955] Re: pdftopdf filter fails to output form field values

2013-02-10 Thread Tobias Hoffmann
Form values are also lost with the old pdftopdf implementation (used in cups-filters before 1.0.21). Probably only the pdf-ps workflow ever worked. The form values are also lost by just using qpdf to 'non-destructively' rewrite the pdf. Therefore the problem is already present in the underlying

[Bug 923955] Re: pdftopdf filter fails to output form field values

2013-02-10 Thread Adam Reichold
Concerning printing with Evince: I think it converts the PDF to PostScript before sending it to CUPS for printing hence flattening the interactive features. The problem manifests only if one tries to use lp (or similar commmands) directly or if the application (like qpdfview) tries to take

[Bug 923955] Re: pdftopdf filter fails to output form field values

2013-02-10 Thread Philippe Laflamme
It's true that the example form has the Acrobat Professional extensions enabled. They're not required for basic form-filling, but they are for certain features such as comments and digital signatures. It's possible that doing pdf-pdf conversion will fail in this circumstance... Printing these

[Bug 923955] Re: pdftopdf filter fails to output form field values

2012-01-30 Thread Philippe Laflamme
** Attachment added: PDF form filled with values for reproducing issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923955/+attachment/2701810/+files/interactiveform_enabled_filled.pdf ** Description changed: Running the provided form through the pdftopdf filter results in an empty PDF form: all