Re: [Bug 922162] Re: pdf output file is 6 times bigger than if created by simple-scan

2012-01-30 Thread tranchais
Le 30/01/2012 08:01, Jeffrey Ratcliffe a écrit : As I said, the file size depends heavily on the compression. You are using JPG compression, which is good for photo-type images, but not for scans of text. The image is 8-bit, when 1-bit would have done. You say that you are using

Re: [Bug 922162] Re: pdf output file is 6 times bigger than if created by simple-scan

2012-01-30 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
On 30 January 2012 10:58, tranchais pma...@neuf.fr wrote: You say that you are using thresholding, but the log file doesn't show this. Yes, it does, on lines 76 and 80 No. Those just tell you the default settings, should you use the threshold tool. To actually use it, you have to go to

Re: [Bug 922162] Re: pdf output file is 6 times bigger than if created by simple-scan

2012-01-27 Thread tranchais
Le 26/01/2012 17:36, Jeffrey Ratcliffe a écrit : This depends heavily on the compression options you chose when saving the PDF, and whether you embedded OCR output. Please start with gscan2pdf --log=log save a PDF, close gscan2pdf, and post the log file. Thank you for your quick answer. In

Re: [Bug 922162] Re: pdf output file is 6 times bigger than if created by simple-scan

2012-01-26 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
This depends heavily on the compression options you chose when saving the PDF, and whether you embedded OCR output. Please start with gscan2pdf --log=log save a PDF, close gscan2pdf, and post the log file. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is