*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 941464 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941464
OK - maybe this is not an exact duplicate of bug 941464 (which describes
flickering while importing). The underlying cause is the same, however.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 941464 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941464
This is a duplicate of bug 941464, and is known upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4775 . The bug has been fixed in trunk.
The fix will be in Shotwell 0.11.93, coming this week.
** This bug has
Romano: thanks for your observations, but we prefer that a bug ticket
such as this one be focused on only one issue (RW2 support in this
case). If you want to report a number of small problems, you could send
a message to the Shotwell mailing list. Or you could file tickets for
those problems
Maui: thanks for letting us know that you're still not seeing RW2 files
in Shotwell. It's difficult for us to test this since we don't have a
camera that shoots RW2 here at Yorba, but we'll see what we can do.
Most GNOME programs (such as Nautilus or gedit or Totem) require the
latest versions
This looks like bug http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4201 upstream. As
described in comments #5 and #7 on that ticket, the rename operation can
lead to a crash or other unpredictable behavior. The bug has been fixed
for the next release of Shotwell, version 0.12. The fix is also present
in the
Thanks for the bug report. This bug is known upstream:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4262
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923325
Title:
Setting Developer to Camera on RAW files
Romano,
the gphoto bug has been fixed in the latest libgphoto, version 2.4.12.
That version is not yet available in Ubuntu Precise, but should appear
there soon. We're still not completely sure whether that will solve the
RW2 problem in Shotwell, however; see
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3428
This bug is known and has been fixed in trunk. See
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4775
We'll be releasing Shotwell 0.11.93 including the bug fix early next
week.
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Public bug reported:
In Precise, libraw5 depends on liblcms2-2. If I install libraw-dev
without liblcms2-dev, then 'pkg-config --libs libraw' fails:
Package lcms2 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `lcms2.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH
I see this too. I've ticketed this upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4715 . We'll look into this right away.
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Yes, this bug still occurs on Precise with all the latest updates. To
see it, for example, open gedit, choose View-Fullscreen, then press
Ctrl+H for Replace. When the Replace dialog appears, the Unity panel
and launcher will appear too.
This bug also affects Shotwell; see
This flickering was caused by a recent GTK update, and has been fixed in
trunk: see http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4775 . We're planning to
issue a new release 0.11.93 next week including the fix.
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
You received this
This is a known bug: Shotwell does not correctly handle dates before
1969. If you try to give photos dates earlier than that, you may get
unpredictable results including incorrect sorting. See
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3040
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
This bug was http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3672 , and has been fixed in
trunk. The fix will be in the next release, Shotwell 0.11.
** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3672
http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3672
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I'm also missing the title bar in Firefox. On my machine Thunderbird
does have a title bar.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/861265
Title:
[Oneiric] [Regression] firefox title bar
This bug report is about an older version of Shotwell (0.9). Could you
upgrade to the latest release (0.11) and see whether the problem still
occurs?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This now looks like this bug, which we fixed in Shotwell 0.11.3:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4172
Hopefully Ubuntu will push 0.11.3 (or later) to Oneiric soon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I'm seeing this too. I'm on a MacBook7,1.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/845174
Title:
Second monitor doesn't work on MacBookAir3,1 with nvidia-current
driver
To manage
We're hoping to implement this for Shotwell 0.12, which will appear
early next year.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625331
Title:
Multiple-tag research is not available
To manage
Note that the latest release of Shotwell (0.11) builds only with GTK 2.
The next release (0.12) will appear in early 2012, and will support GTK
3. In the meantime, we'd like to have a daily build of the current
trunk, which does already support GTK 3. We're working on that:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 894553 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894553
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 894553
Writing metadata to files... never finishes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 887357 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887357
This is a duplicate of bug 887357. The bug has been fixed for the
upcoming release of Shotwell (0.12).
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 887357
send to... broken
--
You received this bug
Romano: yes, an SD image like that would be extremely helpful if it lets
us reproduce this problem here at Yorba. If you can share an image with
us via UbuntuOne (or post a download link) then we can take a look.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Actually, we would like to evolve Shotwell so that all metadata edits
and changes are always stored in files, not only in the database.
There are several ways this can happen:
- we can write metadata changes to the original photo file (which is what
happens when this checkbox is checked today)
-
Great. I downloaded the tar.gz and extracted it onto an SD card. For
me, Shotwell shows the card as a Mass Storage Camera and correctly
displays the RW2 and JPEG images (see attached screenshot). I'm able to
import them just fine. I'm using Ubuntu 12.04, Shotwell from git
master, libraw
** Attachment added: import.png
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/853373/+attachment/2824653/+files/import.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/853373
Title:
What happens if you run Shotwell again? Does the crash occur every time
you try to start it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947561
Title:
shotwell crashed with SIGSEGV in size()
To
Maui: Debian testing will often not have the latest packages. Even
Debian experimental will sometimes have older packages than the
alpha/beta releases of commercially supported distributions such as
Ubuntu and Fedora. Debian is an awesome community project, but because
the commercially supported
This has been fixed upstream: Shotwell will now search only the DCIM
directory if it is present. The fix is present in 0.11.93 and will be
in the upcoming 0.12 release.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Right. This is the same as upstream bug
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4040 , more or less.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964613
Title:
Can't see .jpg image in Shotwell when .CR2
Yes, that would be nice. This feature request is known upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/2797
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965683
Title:
Should detect which photos have
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 887357 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887357
This is a duplicate of bug 887357. The bug has been fixed in Shotwell
0.12.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 887357
send to... broken
--
You received this bug notification because you are
We have a new upstream ticket for this issue:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4950
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638321
Title:
Shotwell accepts f-spot tags with commas ('), but
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/958784
Title:
downloaded pictures detected as duplicates
To manage notifications
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu Precise contains gitg 0.2.4. A new version 0.2.5 was released in
September 2011. It would be nice to update Ubuntu to use this version.
** Affects: gitg (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Public bug reported:
I'm running Epiphany 3.4.0.1 on Ubuntu 12.04. Whenever I try to add a
bookmark, Epiphany hangs and consumes 100% CPU.
The bug does not occur on Fedora 17, so this may be related to Ubuntu's
changes to GTK. The hang occurs inside
gtk_scrolled_window_size_allocate(), so it
Oddly, if I enable overlay scrollbars (by installing liboverlay-
scrollbar3) then everything works fine. This hang only occurs when
overlay scrollbars are disabled.
** Summary changed:
- adding a bookmark hangs Epiphany
+ adding a bookmark hangs Epiphany if overlay scrollbars are disabled
--
Also, if I switch to the Adwaita theme then everything works fine. The
hang only occurs when I use the default Ambiance theme with overlay
scrollbars disabled.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 971468 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971468
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 971468
Doesn't start: libgexiv2.so.0 = not found
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 971468 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971468
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 971468
Doesn't start: libgexiv2.so.0 = not found
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 971468 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971468
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 971468
Doesn't start: libgexiv2.so.0 = not found
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
A user reported this problem a year ago, but then it seemed to go away
with Natty alpha 2:
bug #700678
The upstream ticket was http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3084 .
What kind of camera do you have?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
In the gexiv2 packaging in Ubuntu, debian/control contains this line:
Homepage: http://trac.yorba.org/wiki/gexiv2
That URL is out of date. It should look like this:
Homepage: http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/gexiv2/wiki
** Affects: gexiv2 (Ubuntu)
Importance:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 887357 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887357
This is a duplicate of #887357, reported upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4432. It has been fixed in Shotwell
0.11.92 (currently available in Ubuntu Precise).
** This bug has been marked a
This is filed as a Shotwell bug, but has nothing to do with Shotwell.
So I'm marking this as invalid - please reopen or refile this under a
different Ubuntu component.
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Great - thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890372
Title:
use libraw shared libary
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
This seems worth investigating. I've ticketed this upstream:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4649
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916441
Title:
gsettings-data-convert crashed with
Public bug reported:
I'm running Nemiver 0.9.1 on Ubuntu Precise (12.04) alpha.
Every time I launch an application for debugging from within Nemiver, I
get this critical assertion:
Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_window_get_pointer: assertion `GDK_IS_WINDOW
(window)' failed
This behavior is specific to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 887357 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887357
I believe you've run into
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/887357
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4432
This is a known bug which we've fixed for the upcoming 0.12 release. As
such
Jim,
what kind of camera do you have? Does this problem happen after every
single import? If you import, say, 20 pictures from your camera and
then select Last Import from the sidebar, does it show almost all the
pictures (say, 18 or 19), or just a few? Are you importing only JPEG
photos, or
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 893326 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893326
Thanks for the bug report. This looks like a duplicate of bug #893326.
It's also known upstream as http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4207 .
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 893326
Shotwell
This looks like a bug already reported upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3895
We should investigate this for the upcoming 0.12 release.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907937
Thanks for the bug report. What format are your video clips in? What
kind of camera did you use to take them?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908640
Title:
doesnt recognize vertical
This bug was http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4263 upstream. It is
present in Shotwell 0.11.6 as you observed, and has been fixed in the
development trunk. The fix will be in the next Shotwell release (0.12).
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
You
Thanks for the information. Could you take a 1-second vertical video
with your camera and attach it to this ticket? It would be a useful
test case for this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thanks for the sample video. Both Totem and VLC behave the same way as
Shotwell: they play the movie in an horizontal orientation. It's not
clear whether the video contains any information that would allow a
program to determine its proper orientation. Are you aware of any
program which will
ffplay also plays the video horizontally, by the way.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908640
Title:
doesnt recognize vertical movie clips, it leave them orizzontal
To manage
Thanks for the bug report. We've ticketed this upstream:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4541
Could you possibly attach the offending video (MOVIEOBJ.BDM) here, or
post a link to it if it's too large to attach?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 862347 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862347
This is actually a duplicate of bug #860657, found upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4172. It was fixed in Shotwell 0.11.3.
You should be able to update to 0.11.6 via the oneiric-updates
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 862347 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862347
Actually a duplicate of bug #862347.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 862347
shotwell crashed with SIGABRT in import_ui_get_media_specific_string():
code should not be reached
--
You
Actually I think this is just a specific instance of a more general
problem, which is that dragging and dropping from Shotwell works only to
Nautilus, not to other applications. This is
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/1563 . (See also bug #821915 , which is
another instance of this.)
** Changed
This behavior is expected if the photos you're importing are already in
the library directory: in that case Shotwell won't copy them (and, in
recent versions of Shotwell, won't ask you whether you want the photos
copied). So if Shotwell doesn't seem to be copying your photos, you
should check
Thanks for the bug report and log file. This has also been reported
upstream at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4297 .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894553
Title:
Writing metadata
Also: this bug has been reported upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/1940, and has already been reported in
Launchpad as bug #696138. If you're looking for a workaround, then
instead of filing a duplicate bug report it would be better to ask for
help on the mailing list and/or post a
Alex,
there are a couple of things you can helpfully do:
1. Enable logging. To do this, run SHOTWELL_LOG=1 shotwell from a
command prompt. As Shotwell runs, it will write a log file to
~/.cache/shotwell/shotwell.log.
2. Run Shotwell under GDB. That way when Shotwell crashes you'll get a
Daisy,
first, to be clear, there are no symbolic links involved in this
situation. Shotwell simply imports the photos in question into its
database in their current filesystem locations. (Shotwell will never,
in fact, create a symbolic link). In earlier versions of Shotwell we
referred to this
Note that this bug has been fixed upstream. The fix will be in the
Shotwell release (0.12).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887357
Title:
send to... broken
To manage notifications
Adrian,
you're running a fairly old version of Shotwell (0.7). The current
release is Shotwell 0.11. Could you upgrade to a newer version of
Ubuntu and/or Shotwell and see if the problem still occurs?
If you can't upgrade, could you attach the photos that are failing to
display here?
--
You
The bugs are not the same. This bug (797117) does not involve missing
photos, and as I explained in comment #6 it's not actually a bug
according to the Shotwell designers. It's simply how Shotwell works,
though we could possibly display more helpful messages to explain what's
going on (as
Adrian,
the photo you attached has no EXIF, IPTC or XMP data, as revealed by the
exiv2 command:
$ exiv2 -pa Alicia%27s%20Motorcycle.jpg
$
Shotwell has no idea what its date is, so it lists it in No Event. This
is expected behavior.
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
This bug has been reported upstream here:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3641
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/830594
Title:
ShotWell crashes while writing metadata to files.
To
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745831
Title:
shotwell crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I'm seeing this too (on Fedora 15, actually). I've filed a bug upstream
here:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648224
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #648224
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648224
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I'm seeing this too: on my Oneiric machine, a double click on a
maximized window's title bar does nothing. It should unmaximize the
window.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776977
I'm seeing this too in the current Oneiric build. I'm running on a
MacBook which has an nVidia graphics card, so the problem does not seem
to be specific to ATI.
I think this bug should have importance High. It's quite distracting
that window titles are wrong all the time. As a workaround, I
I can't reproduce this in the current Shotwell trunk. Could you update
to the current version of Shotwell (0.11) and see whether the problem
still occurs?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Andries,
I just tried your steps with Shotwell 0.11+trunk, Ubuntu 11.10 and
Thunderbird 7.0 and everything worked just fine - both the on-disk
filename and the attachment filename contain spaces. So it looks like
this has been fixed by the newer versions of one or more of these
software
Mark,
what versions of Shotwell and Ubuntu are you using? Are you seeing the
same crash others have reported here (SIGSEGV in
data_source_get_typename)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Maxxer is right. It turns out that the bug fix in 0.11.4 was
inadequate, and so we're planning to release 0.11.5 in the next few
days.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873851
Title:
libraw has been packaged in Ubuntu since Maverick, so I think this bug
can now be closed.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568726
Public bug reported:
Precise currently has libraw 0.14.0. It would be nice to update to the
latest release, 0.14.3.
** Affects: libraw (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
Precise currently includes only gmime 2.4. It would be great to have
gmime 2.6 available. (This will likely be a requirement for Geary,
Yorba's upcoming email client - see
http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/geary/wiki .)
** Affects: gmime2.4 (Ubuntu)
Importance:
This bug is known upstream:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4207
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893326
Title:
Shotwell does not delete files it claims to...
To manage notifications
I can reproduce this in the current trunk build of Shotwell. I've filed
a bug upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4432
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887357
Title:
send
As long as libraw is installed on the system, the normal Shotwell build
should link to it dynamically. If that doesn't seem to be happening and
it's unclear why, let us know and we can investigate more.
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
You received this bug
Thanks for the bug report. Could you generate a log file and attach it
to this bug? To do that, run Shotwell from the command line like this:
$ SHOTWELL_LOG=1 shotwell
After the metadata writing hangs, exit Shotwell. Then find the file
~/.cache/shotwell/shotwell.log and attach it here.
Thanks for the bug report. We have a ticket for this upstream:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3030
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887522
Title:
Shotwell does not show 3gp videos
To chime in here, as I mentioned above I have a newer Macbook (a
MacBook7,1) and am still seeing this behavior running Oneiric with all
the latest updates. More specifically:
1. I start my laptop with an external monitor connected. After I log in, the
external monitor is still blank.
2. I run
For Shotwell, this is ticketed upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/421 .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882825
Title:
Does not save the configuration file under ~/.config/
Thanks for the bug report. I can reproduce this. The good news is that
in git master (where we've ported to GTK 3), the hang does not occur.
The assertions do still occur there, though, and we should fix those, so
I've ticketed this upstream:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4366
--
You
Public bug reported:
I'm running Abiword 2.8.6 on Ubuntu 11.10.
I'd like to set Abiword as the default application for opening ODT and
DOC files. When I right click a DOC file in Nautilus, Abiword shows up
in the context menu; that's good. When I right click an ODT file in
Nautilus, Abiword
Shotwell itself does not use lcms; it uses libraw, which depends on
lcms1 in Ubuntu. Note that libraw 0.13.8 (present in Oneiric) can build
using either lcms1 or lcms2. So to solve this particular dependency I
suspect that you only need to update your libraw packaging to build
using lcms2. You
Public bug reported:
It was once possible to build libraw only as a static library. A few
releases ago libraw changed to support both static and shared libraries.
Currently in Ubuntu both libraw.a and libraw.so are packaged in the
libraw-dev package. Instead, libraw.so should live in a separate
Till: Yes, there really is a libraw. :) You're not seeing it because
on Ubuntu Shotwell is built using libraw as a static library, so libraw
is compiled into the Shotwell executable. It would be nice to use a
shared library instead, but we can't do that at the moment because
libraw.so currently
This seems like a reasonable idea. I've created a ticket in Shotwell's
bug database:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4274
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878498
Title:
Shotwell
We have a ticket for this upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3469
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878472
Title:
Shotwell Viewer can't open files without file ending
To
Thanks for the sleuthing, Steve. I've now fixed the malformed changelog
entries upstream. Yes, we should use dch from now on.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871034
Title:
need
Yes - Shotwell doesn't yet support building with Vala 0.13. We'll fix
this in Shotwell 0.12:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3760
On Oneiric, you can install the valac-0.12 package to get a version of
valac that works for Shotwell today.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
That's a reasonable suggestion. I've created a ticket upstream here:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4372
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889738
Title:
Shotwell doesn't show meta
Aha - I see. Thanks for the explanation.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885645
Title:
create separate package for libraw shared library
To manage notifications about this bug go
1 - 100 of 838 matches
Mail list logo
