[Bug 993258] [NEW] package clamav-daemon (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-05-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: I don't know ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: clamav-daemon (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64

[Bug 993258] Re: package clamav-daemon (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-05-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993258 Title: package clamav-daemon (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned

[Bug 1041966] Re: package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package

2012-08-26 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041966 Title: package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in

[Bug 1041966] [NEW] package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package

2012-08-26 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: dpkgselect ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic 3.2.24 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Aug 27 07:07:28 2012

[Bug 927043] [NEW] when installling

2012-02-05 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: btrfs ? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: ubiquity 2.8.7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.287 Date: Sun Feb 5 16:48:20 2012

[Bug 927043] Re: when installling

2012-02-05 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927043 Title: when installling To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 921523] [NEW] package libomxil-bellagio0 0.9.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127

2012-01-25 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: when sudo apt-get upgrade ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libomxil-bellagio0 0.9.3-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-10.18-generic 3.2.1 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-10-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Jan 25

[Bug 921523] Re: package libomxil-bellagio0 0.9.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127

2012-01-25 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921523 Title: package libomxil-bellagio0 0.9.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-06-29 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I done . I tryed 1 raid array last week. In this case, Linux(fedora/ubuntu) couod not regognize ALL capacity. so I spilitted 2 arrays. thanks. -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-06-30 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Additional test: I tryed another distro,yesterday. In CentOS 5.5 DVD, all capacity was recognized to the second array. 2.5TB . [CentOS inst ]said me initialize this 2.5TB? so. you will use but i did not. because. there are 2.5TB NTFS made by windows XP. i need backup before I was glad to listen

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-01 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I backuped ALL , almost 3TB. I tryed test on CentOS again. Oh, sorry everyone. on CentOS . I misread message size. CentOS had initialized only 0.3GB (2nd array 2.5TB). CentOS initialized only 286079MB on 2.5TB. every linux have same situations for me. I paste dmraid -ay -vvv -d

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-01 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
it is a snapshot of AMD RAID expert software on XP. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7882415/raid-amd.JPG I'll be very happy if I can serve you -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-01 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
What software are you trying to partition with? On Linux, fundamentally I use gparted or ubuntu installer for resize,create,delete. And how are you working out how much disk they are seeing? how to see my partition. on Fedora, just type. $gparted on Ubuntu $gparted /dev/mapper/pdc_raid on

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-01 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I tested acronis disk director 10.0. linuxCDROM boot kernel 2.4.34 DD not support GPT. So, I partitioned as 2TB EXT2 for 2nd array on DD. XP Win7 can read/write this EXT2 partition. but ,ubuntu can not see. -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-01 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
thank you danny r...@phantom:~# sudo dmraid -rD /dev/sdc: pdc, pdc_cdfjcjhfhe, stripe, ok, 1302083328 sectors, data@ 0 /dev/sdb: pdc, pdc_cdfjcjhfhe, stripe, ok, 1302083328 sectors, data@ 0 /dev/sda: pdc, pdc_cdfjcjhfhe, stripe, ok, 1302083328 sectors, data@ 0 r...@phantom:~# cannot dump? --

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-01 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I make out. thank you. ** Attachment added: dmraid-pdc.tar http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51239860/dmraid-pdc.tar ** Also affects: dmraid (Fedora) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
** Attachment added: dmraid-ay-d-vvv.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51297982/dmraid-ay-d-vvv.txt -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
patch dmraid_1.0.0.rc16-3ubuntu2ppa3~lucid1.diff patching file README.source patching file dmraid-activate patch: File dmraid is not a regular file -- can't patch where I mistaked? dmraid -V dmraid version: 1.0.0.rc16 (2009.09.16) dmraid library version: 1.0.0.rc16

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I can not find dmraid_1.0.0.rc16.orig.tar.gz in your ppa page. -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
r...@phantom:/sbin# ls -l dmraid -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 26891 2010-07-03 03:15 dmraid I do not understand well because I rarely use it(patch). It is difficult for me to patch. Possible deb.form. or (patched)source code..wholly.. get.. I will be glad. The following can be done if it does so.

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
maybe, it is ok? I coud upgrade. ls -l dmraid -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 21272 2010-05-30 17:58 dmraid ** Attachment added: dbg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51314663/dbg.txt -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
oh, I think that I must wait for building. dmraid -V dmraid version: 1.0.0.rc16 (2009.09.16) shared dmraid library version: 1.0.0.rc16 (2009.09.16) device-mapper version: 4.15.0 -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-03 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
# dpkg -p dmraid | grep Ver Version: 1.0.0.rc16-3ubuntu2ppa3~lucid1 r...@phantom:/home/ehhen# dmraid -ay -d -vvv dmraid-ay-d-vvv.txt ** Attachment added: dmraid-ay-d-vvv.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51327549/dmraid-ay-d-vvv.txt -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-03 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
how to treat *.udev files? there(2files) could not install by dependency. another 3 .deb could be install. ** Attachment added: 2nd.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51356328/2nd.txt -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-03 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Awareness: Current, Only just type gpated. I can see /dev/mapper/pdc. it's good . Current my partition: 1st array(2TB) /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe1 * 16646533839637 HPFS/NTFS /primary /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe26647 13276532474427

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-04 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
is this ok? metadata.tar.gz ** Attachment added: metadata.tar.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51368604/metadata.tar.gz -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 599255] [NEW] fakeraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-06-28 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: I have two amd sb7*** motherbord. I use raid0(1.5TB x 3=4.5TB) by bios(SB7*0). I partitioned two array. 2.0TB(A) 2.5TB(B). win7-64 winxp32ubuntu10.4x64/fedora13 x64

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-06-28 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
** Summary changed: - fakeraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 + dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 ** Description changed: - I have two amd sb7*** motherbord. - I use raid0(1.5TB x 3=4.5TB) by bios(SB7*0). + I have two amd sb7*** motherbord. I tryed two case. - I partitioned two array. 2.0TB(A)

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-09 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
add information: I swaped motherboard from asus M4A78-EM/1394 to asus M3A78-T. There have almost compatible raid chip SB7xx. asus M4A78-EM/1394 AMD790GX +SB750 raidbios 3.0.1540.59 and 3.0.1540.39(both I tested). asus M3A78-T AMD780G+SB710 raidbios now,I can not see. I get

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-10 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I swaped motherboard, again.restored to and Correction RAIDBIOS VERSION M4A78-EM/1394 AMD790GX +SB750 raidbios 3.0.1540.39 M3A78-TAMD780G +SB710 raidbios 3.0.1540.39 3.0.1540.59 -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-14 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I had seen SB7*0 debelopment guide. it was difficult for me to undaerstand. http://support.amd.com/us/Embedded_TechDocs/43366_sb7xx_bdg_pub_1.00.pdf By the way. These bugs are in All Linux distro(CentOS,Redhat6.0 betaCurrent,Fedora). And like Acronis products. if No one would do the bug fix.

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-04 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I'm relieved. Slowly, I'll wait. Thank you,all. -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-05 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Hi Danny, raid0-1st array: Using /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe Disk /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe: 1999 GB, 193282560 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243152 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes →It is the same as former. It is good in this. raid0-2nd array: Using

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-06 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I initialized 2 pattern, guid , mbr on 2.5TB 2nd array. by Gparted. on Gparted. A)Case of GUIDed , ubuntu could not partation. it failed. B)Case of MBR, ubutn could partition. it was success. case a: there are no files pdc_cdgjdcefic1,2. so gparted failed. # dmraid -s *** Active Set name :

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-06 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
On guided partition, ubuntu can not partition. -- a) disk utility Error creating partition: helper exited with exit code 1: In part_add_partition: device_file=/dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic, start=0, size=1000, type=EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7 Entering MS-DOS parser (offset=0,

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-06 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
So, I initilized GPT, I useed fdisk to partitioning. 3partitons, EXT4,EXT4,swap. But these partitions were not recognize on Windows7x64. not comaptible?! Windows7 Diskmanager tell me . Which type do you initialize GPT. or MBR? -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-06 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
And, onWin4x64. I initilized GPT, I partitioned 2 NTFS part. But these partitions are not recognize on Ubuntu, too. GPT was not compatible. DiskUtility shows me, not formatted 2.5TB. not GPT, not MBR. add: Disk utility could not format GPT/MBR to 2.5TB. it failed. Gparted could format partation

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-06 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Are you sure the partitions you created in windows did not exist in Ubuntu? Could you recreate them and then do a print screen of gparted looking at the drive? Yes, in ubuntu, There are no partition. (Perhaps, I could not see partition table). -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-06 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
this snapshot which createed mbr on win7x64. now, I can see this partation table . but size are misread. I made 2048GB NTFS and other 279.37GB(not partationed). but ubuntu gparted show me that 1024GB and blank 1.27TiB. ** Attachment added: win7x64.png

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-06 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Seeing in Ubuntu ** Attachment added: Screenshot--dev-mapper-pdc_cdgjdcefic - GParted-1.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51492571/Screenshot--dev-mapper-pdc_cdgjdcefic%20-%20GParted-1.png -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-07 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Thanks , about my 2nd 2.5TB RAID0. 1st , boot Win7x64, and created NTFS limit(automatic 2048GB). next boot ubuntu, I created manulaly 2TB NTFS(and other blank 239GB(286079MiB)) by Gparted. and next, boot Win7x64 again. In disk management shows me , 1 partition as 2.5TB RAW disk(not formated).

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-07 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I had Miscalculation. 2097149MiB to 2097152MiB. The latter setting the new. I recreated partition. and recreated mbr. Disk /dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic: 2498 GB, 2498996344320 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 303819 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
With the NTFS partition you created in Ubuntu is the same partition then visible in windows? Previously, as written. on Raid array1, Visible,I can use/read/write NTFS which was created by ubuntu in windows. no problem.Interoperability,each other,ubuntu and windows/XP/7. on Raid array2, I can

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Anyway you do need to use gpt partitioning to use large volumes like this. Previously, as written. ubuntu can not create GUID partition in my 2nd array. gparted . and diskutility too. the other ubuntu can make guid partition table. (parted) p

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
(using kpartx which your procedure) ubutu can create partition on GPT disk(2nd) by gparted. Disk /dev/mapper/pdc_befgjjibfc: 2300 GB, 2300997404160 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 279747 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
And reboot, swicth to win7x64. Diskmanager told me. Which type initialize GPT or MBR. there are no partition table. #46 same situation.I try again and again. And Going around in circles. -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
And, I initilized as windows told me. MBR. I created A 2TiB partiation. I decided to throw away the fraction. 0.09TiB. and reboot, swich to ubuntu. #gpated Strange phenomenon occurs. There are GPT partiton. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6626165/Screenshot--dev-mapper-pdc_befgjjibfc%20-%20GParted.png

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I boot WinXP32. on management of computer. there are 2nd raid array. basic, norml.4095.99GB. ---Abnormal value. -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Next ,I boot Win7x64. on management of computer. there anre 2nd raid array. basic.normal 2142.97GB RAW DISK. not ntfs. so I can not see my pictures which put on ubuntu. -- World Cup TV but also watch because, abacus it, I should go back to its core business, next monday. Very grateful to

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
thanks. So you have 2 x 2TB and 1 x 500GB drives. Yes, that is good your idea. However,I tryed last week. I Can create two array, can not create three array. It is limitatations of this raid-bios. only two array. (this asus motherboard) Maybe I saw hope. I initialized 2.09TiB as mbr. and create

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
On ubuntu.gparted . http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6626165/Screenshot--dev-mapper-pdc_befgjjibfc%20-%20GParted.png Numbers are just half the number originally to be presented. This is simply a miscalculation. MBR is correct. -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-09 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I wonder that MBR is correct. is my opnion. sudo dd if=/dev/mapper/pdc_befgjjibfc of=linmbr2.img bs=512 count=1 In this my environment , Sometimes strange phenomenon occurs nearly 1st july . The command(sudo grub-install /dev/mappaer/myraid1 ) may be viable, sometimes not. The operation is

[Bug 642799] [NEW] fglrx kernel module failed to build

2010-09-19 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: what shall i do. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: fglrx (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.43-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Sep 19 22:28:47 2010 DkmsStatus: vboxdrv,

[Bug 642799] Re: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2010-09-19 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608367/+files/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608368/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DKMSBuildLog.txt

[Bug 973088] Re: tracker-miner-fs crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()

2012-04-15 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
when atached iPhone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973088 Title: tracker-miner-fs crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1080711] [NEW] package bluez 4.101-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: サブプロセス インストール済みの post-installation スクリプト はエラー終了ステータス 1 を返しました

2012-11-19 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: i dont know. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: bluez 4.101-0ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-19.30-generic 3.5.7 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu6 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Nov

[Bug 993258] [NEW] package clamav-daemon (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-05-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: I don't know ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: clamav-daemon (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64

[Bug 993258] Re: package clamav-daemon (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-05-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993258 Title: package clamav-daemon (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit

[Bug 971839] Re: aptd crashed with UnboundLocalError in _emit_acquire_item(): local variable 'lang' referenced before assignment

2012-04-10 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
i dont know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971839 Title: aptd crashed with UnboundLocalError in _emit_acquire_item(): local variable 'lang' referenced before assignment To manage

[Bug 971839] Re: aptd crashed with UnboundLocalError in _emit_acquire_item(): local variable 'lang' referenced before assignment

2012-04-05 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
i dont know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971839 Title: aptd crashed with UnboundLocalError in _emit_acquire_item(): local variable 'lang' referenced before assignment To manage

[Bug 1041966] [NEW] package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package

2012-08-26 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: dpkgselect ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic 3.2.24 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Aug 27 07:07:28 2012

[Bug 1041966] Re: package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package

2012-08-26 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041966 Title: package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other

[Bug 1558621] [NEW] package fglrx 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1

2016-03-19 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: none ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: fglrx 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-32.37~14.04.1-generic 3.19.8-ckt7 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-32-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19

[Bug 1553803] [NEW] fglrx-updates-core 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1: fglrx-updates-core kernel module failed to build

2016-03-06 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: no decoration windows. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: fglrx-updates-core 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-32.37~14.04.1-generic 3.19.8-ckt7 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-32-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx

[Bug 1543704] Re: Gparted crashed on loading

2016-04-14 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I had similar, before 4Weeks, in ubuntu 16.04 beta. Assertion (metadata_length > 0) at ../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:2313 in function add_logical_part_metadata() failed. libparted : 3.2 == Backtrace has 15 calls on stack: 15: