closing for libpciaccess
** Changed in: libpciaccess (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726099
Title:
libvirtd assert
closing the libnl task, sssd 1.10 will build against libnl3 anyway, and
looks like netcf got fixed as well
** Changed in: libnl (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug
libsemanage is in main now
** Changed in: libsemanage (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903752
Title:
[MIR] sssd
To
closing as fixed then
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/911747
Title:
[Feature] Add
** Also affects: libpwquality (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** No longer affects: libnl (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903752
Title:
** Description changed:
+ sssd ding-libs (which got split off sssd at some point):
+
1. Availability:
- in universe for some time
2. Rationale:
- https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-p-sssd-mir
3. Security:
- no current CVE
- five CVE reports in the
Public bug reported:
These symlinks are created on cobbler-web.postinst, but not cleaned on
postrm. This means that for instance reloading apache config fails,
because the target of the symlink is gone.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: cobbler (not installed)
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard set to:
Upstream plans to release 1.8.0 by February, as it's targeted for RHEL
6.3 and is the next Long Term Maintenance branch (like 1.5.x was). We
should probably aim for getting that version.
--
System Security Services Daemon (SSSD) MIR
https
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Upstream plans to release 1.8.0 by February, as it's targeted for RHEL
6.3 and is the next Long Term Maintenance branch (like 1.5.x was). We
- should probably aim for getting that version.
+ should probably aim for getting that version
About the libsemanage dependency; as far as I understand, it's only
needed if the host is using SELinux together with sssd configured with a
'local' domain (so that pam_sssd handles local accounts). So if we are
not interested in fully supporting SELinux in main, the build-dep could
be dropped.
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard set to:
Work items:
[tjaalton] package python-nss: DONE
[tjaalton] upload python-nss: DONE
[tjaalton] package python-krbv: DONE
[tjaalton] upload python-krbv: DONE
[tjaalton] package certmonger: DONE
[tjaalton] upload certmonger: DONE
[tjaalton] add
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Opinion = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463
Title:
[needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu
To manage
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
- Upstream plans to release 1.8.0 by February, as it's targeted for RHEL
- 6.3 and is the next Long Term Maintenance branch (like 1.5.x was). We
- should probably aim for getting that version. -- tjaalton
+ Upstream plans to release 1.8.0
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Work items:
[tjaalton] package python-nss: DONE
[tjaalton] upload python-nss: DONE
[tjaalton] package python-krbv: DONE
[tjaalton] upload python-krbv: DONE
[tjaalton] package certmonger: DONE
[tjaalton] upload certmonger: DONE
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
- Work items:
+ Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
+ necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
+ after the prereqs are already done.
+
+ Work items (precise-alpha-2
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
not interested in the backport for lucid anymore
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Triaged = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/662576
Title:
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Upstream plans to release 1.8.0 beta by early February (final mid
March), as it's targeted for F17/RHEL 6.3 and is the next Long Term
Maintenance branch (like 1.5.x was). We should probably aim for getting
that version. -- tjaalton
looks like the issue about tevent has been replied.
** Changed in: tevent (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903752
Title:
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #771484
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771484
** Also affects: openldap (Fedora) via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771484
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Jamie, thank you for the review!
Debian will have 1.5.16 as soon as I've passed the Debian Maintainership
process, if not uploaded by a sponsor earlier. I'm also hopeful that
squeeze will get 1.8.x which is what I'm preparing for precise as well,
since it's the next LTM release as Stephen pointed
Jelmer, that would be great. I'll ping you early next week. Ding-libs
needs to go first and sssd after that.
ps. I have a whole lot of other packages too if you're interested to
sponsor them (389ds, freeipa related) ;)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Upstream bug at http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi?findid=7167
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/929888
Title:
ldap_result returns -1 when called from sssd
To
Ryan, can you build openldap with the proposed patch and test?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/929888
Title:
ldap_result returns -1 when called from sssd
To manage
Built it myself (64bit) and put it here:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~tjaalton/lp929888
install the lib and test.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/929888
Title:
yeah adding a profile for apparmor is a good idea, I'll add a bug about
it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903752
Title:
[MIR] sssd
To manage notifications about this
scratch that, it was tested elsewhere and didn't help :/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/929888
Title:
ldap_result returns -1 when called from sssd
To manage
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
The fix to this issue got applied upstream and I uploaded it to precise
(referred to the duplicate bug on the changelog, boo).
Please reopen if you still see it with libldap 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu3.
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
initial manpage patch
* Switched to dh_install
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 23:54:24 +0200
Changed-By: Timo Aaltonen tjaal...@ubuntu.com
Maintainer: Ubuntu 389ds ubuntu-389-directory-ser...@lists.launchpad.net
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/389-ds-base/1.2.10.2-0ubuntu1
** Bug watch
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
** Also affects: openldap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: nss (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
Rather fine-grained task list below. Uploading full 389ds stack is not
necessary (hence status isn't BLOCKED), though not a whole lot of work
after the prereqs are already done.
Work items (precise-alpha-2):
[tjaalton] package
** Also affects: libnl (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903752
Title:
[MIR] sssd
To manage notifications about this
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 988520 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988520
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 988520
After failed auth, subsequent auths in same context fail
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which
This could be a dupe of bug 981125, please test the backported package
found here:
https://launchpad.net/~sssd/+archive/updates
** Changed in: sssd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Public bug reported:
libldap-2.4-2 depends on libgssapi3-heimdal due to broken build-depends.
The merge notes say:
(remaining changes)
+ Enable GSSAPI support (LP: #495418):
- debian/patches/gssapi.diff, thanks to Jerry Carter (Likewise):
- Add --with-gssapi support
not an issue afte all, but looks weird since I was under the impression
that MIT krb5 was the defacto default on Ubuntu (and Debian, where the
heimal-dev dependency comes from).
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New = Invalid
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Quantal)
Adding samba4 to the mix, as the new PAC responder needs it. It's
currently disabled from the package, but I'll re-enable once R opens.
Also, I'd rather just sync it from Debian if we could get libsemanage in
main as well. There's no other diff than what's caused by the rather
artificial
Blueprint changed by Timo Aaltonen:
Whiteboard changed:
According to http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/389_Change_FAQ all
references to this server and packages built for it should be renamed to
389. This happened as of sometime May. I think their FAQ explains the
history
I assume this was a dupe of the other bug, but if the package from
https://launchpad.net/~sssd/+archive/updates doesn't fix it, feel free
to reopen.
** Changed in: nss (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
** Changed in:
There seem to be several issues with cobbler and the current python-
django on 12.10. This bug is the same as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828632 but fixing reveals
other bugs. Seems like no-one has tested cobbler on 12.10 before
release..
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla
I had this patch (plus patches from Apple to support updating the PTR
records) applied to a local package version at my previous job, so it
did work. Aaron, can you confirm that the proposed version works?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
moving to openssh, since the patch is needed there?
(I'm currently evaluating apparmor, so would like to confine sshd)
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: apparmor = openssh
--
sshd profile does not work out-of-the-box
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228229
You received this bug
And back to apparmor.. The profile does need some changes, but no
modifications to openssh AIUI. Here's what I had to add:
/etc/default/locale r,
/var/cache/nscd/group r,
/var/cache/nscd/passwd r,
/etc/selinux/config r,
/etc/selinux/default/seusers r,
/etc/krb5.conf r,
it's already available in the 'koan' package.
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1092598
Title:
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196388
a new version will be uploaded to saucy soon
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076290
Title:
quite a bit of time has passed without reply, closing
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Canonical Server Team (canonical-server) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
seems to be fixed in 2.4.0
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015678
Title:
Cobbler exits
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/978999
Title:
command injection on the host via the xmlrpc
marking wontfix as per discussion
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Won't Fix
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Milestone: quantal-alpha-3 = None
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a bug assignee.
thanks for filing the bug, I'll fix this soon
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
--
You received this bug
I believe this should be fixed now, could you re-test?
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team
it's still a bug if upgrade fails.. this needs closer inspection
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
no need to move samba4 in main, we'll need to merge samba 4.0.x from
debian instead
** Package changed: samba4 (Ubuntu) = samba (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which
Well, I still need to file a MIR for libpwquality, and a separate one
for ding-libs if needed (it got split off sssd some time ago)
and actually, when the new samba is merged ldb will move to main, so
having it here is probably unnecessary
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
samba 4.0.10 is now in depwait (due to ldb, libparse-yapp-perl,
faketime)
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
dropped ldb from here, it has a MIR of it's own:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ldb/+bug/1250463
** No longer affects: ldb (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
and now ding-libs has one too: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/ding-libs/+bug/1250467
** No longer affects: ding-libs (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
..and libpwquality already had an old MIR where the pam-module was not
promoted at that time, but I've reopened it now:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpwquality/+bug/1017285
** No longer affects: libpwquality (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
.
** Changed in: sssd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) = Didier Roche (didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903752
Title:
[MIR] sssd
To manage
the new samba is still in proposed, but I should probably upload a new
sssd to build against samba-dev instead of the old packages
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903752
synced 1.11.1-1 from unstable, 1.11.2-1 will follow later.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903752
Title:
[MIR] sssd
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
so.. I realized that I could've synced 1.11.1-1 earlier, it was the
first release to build with the new samba source package based on 4.0.x
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
It build-depends on samba-dev, which is all that the new samba package
provides :) The old packages are no more.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903752
Title:
[MIR]
as you see, it has built successfully:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/sssd/1.11.1-1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903752
Title:
[MIR] sssd
To manage
please promote the bindings too
** Changed in: ldb (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ldb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1250463
Title:
[MIR] ldb
To manage
forget samba4, it's obsoleted by the new samba :)
samba, OTOH is stuck in proposed for other reasons, mainly bug #1250463
blocking it (AIUI) from moving out of proposed. But sssd got built
against samba-dev which was right.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: ldb (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthias Klose (doko)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ldb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1250463
Title:
[MIR] ldb
To manage notifications about
alrighty, the transition is now done and 1.11.2-1 built against the new
samba, so seeding it should succeed now
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903752
Title:
[MIR] sssd
there already is a MIR for sssd:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/903752
which is just missing someone who knows germinate enough to add it to
the supported seed..
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
so sssd should be moved to main already, I'll see that it happens and
provide this feature to debian too.
** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
--
You received this bug
feel free to submit that upstream
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1266061
Title:
distro-specific logic in python-cobbler
To manage notifications about this bug go
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu.
https
does mint have /etc/debian_version?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1266061
Title:
distro-specific logic in python-cobbler
To manage notifications about this bug go
** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #7760
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7760
** Changed in: samba
Status: Fix Released = Unknown
** Changed in: samba
Remote watch: Samba Bugzilla #7590 = Samba Bugzilla #7760
** Changed in: samba
Remote watch: Samba Bugzilla #7760 = Samba
This is now fixed upstream, perhaps the patch could be backported for
lucid? (it was only accepted for master and 3.5-branch)
** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
Here's a debdiff that includes the two commits backported to 3.4-branch.
** Patch added: samba-lucid.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/558793/+attachment/1796548/+files/samba-lucid.debdiff
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You
for the record, I've tested the patches on lucid and they work fine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558793
Title:
net ads dns register fails in 2008 R2 domain
--
I need to do some further tests, seems like the server doesn't add a PTR
record if there wasn't one when the host was added. Also, looks like it
still fails on domain join.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in
Ok, they are good after all. Samba doesn't add a PTR record, so these
patches didn't help there. When the DNS doesn't know about the host,
it'll create a new A record for it on domain join, and that works with
these patches. So it was a false alarm.
--
You received this bug notification because
moving to nfs-utils for now.
** Package changed: kerberos-configs (Ubuntu) = nfs-utils (Ubuntu)
--
Kerberos, NFS4 and autofs issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368153
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to kerberos-configs in
1 - 100 of 20044 matches
Mail list logo
