** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #701406
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701406
** Also affects: nagios-plugins (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701406
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
Am 21.05.2013 09:55, schrieb Robie Basak:
Please could you check the latest upstream version of
nagios-plugins
sorry, but which latest upstream version are you talking about?!?
Recent upstream version is 1.4.16, same as in Ubuntu and Debian!
Anyways .. I would have a look into the options
** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182247
Title:
check_ide_smart fails with i/o
** Information type changed from Public Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031680
Title:
check_apt always report 0 critical updates
To manage notifications about
Sorry guys .. this ist _NOT_ a security issue (at least no one of
nagios-plugins).
Opening a but upstream might a good idea, but upstream doesn't work on
debian systems. So it's up to you guys to present (useful and senseful)
patches which might be adopted upstream.
If anybody want to rely on
Also an option is to port check_apt to use libapt-pkg[1]. This has the
advantage that libapt-pkg is providing a stable api and we don't need to
parse output of apt-get/aptitude.
The easiest way to get changes into upstream is to send pull
requests[2].
[1]
pending pull request: https://github.com/nagios-plugins/nagios-
plugins/pull/58
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318703
Title:
nagios check_smtp expects
** Also affects: nagios-plugins (Debian)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995984
Title:
check_ssh incorrectly
This issue occures only, if hostname has no valid -record, so this
is no check_ssh issue.
** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in
On 11/13/2012 10:08 AM, Robie Basak wrote:
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
This typo is present in Debian too, and Ubuntu currently doesn't make
any changes over the Debian package. So this bug would be best fixed
directly in Debian, and
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #693124
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693124
** Also affects: nagios3 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693124
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
** No longer affects: nagios-plugins (Debian)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086151
Title:
Nagios utils.pm has wrong default path to rpcinfo
To manage
** Patch added: commited change from debian scm
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1086151/+attachment/3460892/+files/rpcinfo.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu.
reassigning to binary package
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082767
Title:
Configure-time ps command truncates command names
To manage notifications about
sorry ... can't reproduce your problem ... at least on quantal:
root@ubuntu:~# LANG=C /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_procs -C getty
PROCS OK: 6 Prozesse with command name 'getty'
root@ubuntu:~# ps aux|grep getty
root 1004 0.0 0.0 4632 844 tty4 Ss+ 20:33 0:00 /sbin/getty -8
38400
This is a kernel limitation ...
** Package changed: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu) = linux-meta (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in
On Tuesday 30 August 2011 02:21:54 you wrote:
per kees in #ubuntu-devel:
kees smoser: it looks like it's more than just adding it back in, since
they appear to have added vulnerable code now, too.
kees smoser: so you'll need to fix at least the one flaw that the compiler
flags found
are
On Wednesday 07 September 2011 14:52:29 you wrote:
The code wasn't actually vulnerable; GCC couldn't check whenever it was.
I've fixed this in both master and maint-1.4.15. The fix is so trivial
it can be safely applied to any version of the Nagios-Plugins too.
See commit entitled Make GCC
Bug was reported upstream, see
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=2555775group_id=29880atid=397597
--
nagios check_smtp expects integer instead of double
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318703
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
Speaking as Debian Maintainer of the source package php-suhosin, I think you
didn't understand, what the package php5-suhosin stands for.
If you did have a look into the Upstream homepage[1], you can read the
following in the beginning of the page:
Suhosin comes in two independent parts, that
Am 22.07.2013 15:59, schrieb Bugrepoter:
update of the nagios-plugins removes the suid-bit from check_icmp. This
Sorry, this binaries don't have suid set. I guess you did change that on
your own. Maybe you should have a look into
/usr/share/doc/nagios-plugins-basic/README.Debian.gz:
** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203757
Title:
nagios-plugin plugin check_icmp missing
Please be so kind and merge 1.4.16-3 from Debian, which fixes this issue
(beside some small other once):
nagios-plugins (1.4.16-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Fixed check_squid* command definitions
* Add double threshold to check_smtp (LP: #318703)
- 12_check_smtp_double_threshold.dpatch
This is fixed in version 1.5 of nagios-plugins
** Changed in: nagios-plugins
Importance: Unknown = Undecided
** Changed in: nagios-plugins
Status: Unknown = New
** Changed in: nagios-plugins
Remote watch: SourceForge.net Tracker #2555775 = None
** Changed in: nagios-plugins
Wow, that was quick, good job guys =)
Until now, in Ubuntu nothing happened. This fix only exist in Debian
and needs to be merged and pushed into 13.10.
The Status changed to Fix Rleased cause lanchpad detected the
referenced Debian bug is marked as fixed.
Anyways ... the question is: Why
I guess the 32k from 'df' is something like 0%? I can't see anything
wrong from your output for the first view!
** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
you maybe want to recreate that in the corresponsing zfs/kernel package.
** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1244713 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1244713
This is a duplicate of #1244713, thanks for checking there is no open
bug report already about the issue.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1244713
invalid syntax for check_ssh plugin
--
Anyways ... please fill pull requests over there in https://github.com
/monitoring-plugins/monitoring-plugins, the upstream has changed it's
name.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a bug assignee.
Am 30.01.14 20:31, schrieb Robie Basak:
It might also be worth considering what users already use to monitor
their machines for updates, and to provide alerts by patching those
mechanisms. For example, we might SRU a patch to the check_apt nagios
plugin to pick up the EOL kernel state and
I would love to link this to the upstream issue, unfortunately launchpad
doesn't love github bugtracker.
Here we go: https://github.com/monitoring-plugins/monitoring-
plugins/issues/1230
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
Upstream this bug is https://github.com/monitoring-plugins/monitoring-
plugins/issues/993
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155699
Title:
nagios Plugin
Upstream bug is now https://github.com/monitoring-plugins/monitoring-
plugins/issues/1122
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870448
Title:
check_http fails to
Public bug reported:
Since the source package nagios-plugins 1.5 check_raid is missing from
the binary package (nagios-plugins-standards).
** Affects: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: nagios-plugins (Debian)
Importance: Undecided
The problematic change is in 1.5-1ubuntu2. You should build-depend again
on libradius1-dev!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1275495
Title:
check_radius
Public bug reported:
Please merge nagios-plugins 1.5-2 (main) from debian unstable (main).
There are several bugs fixed there.
** Affects: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
nagios-plugins (1.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Update Licensing text from upstream README
* Switch over to packaging ti git-buildpackage
* [1a95a53] Update Vcs-headers
* [e0ee45e] Use check_ldap instead of check_ldaps for the check_ldaps*
command definitions
* [9bc7a29] Add
** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1276032
Title:
Please merge nagios-plugins 1.5-2
bug in php5
** Changed in: php-suhosin (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315507
Title:
[jaunty] php5-odbc module broken
--
On Thursday 03 March 2011 10:49:54 you wrote:
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
*lol* I can't see a vulnerability by installing samba packages, but
anyhow.
Public security bug reported:
Binary package hint: nagios-plugins
I have an internet server. I like to keep as little as
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728328
Title:
nagios plugins depend on samba
--
Hi,
upstream stated the following:
The proper fix would rather be using the nagios thresholds functions. OTOH
it's more likely that we put time toward implementing the new thresholds
format than fixing plugins that were never converted to the old one.
Feel free to attach a working patch if you
Thanks for you bugreport, but I cant find the file you mentioned:
/tmp$ dpkg-source -x nagios-plugins_1.4.12-4ubuntu2.dsc
gpg: Signature made Wed 19 Nov 2008 06:42:40 PM CET using DSA key ID FA14013B
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
dpkg-source: extracting nagios-plugins in
The problem is that adding anything suhosin related to the php.ini
file does not seem to work.
Which php.ini file do you use and do you use libapache2-mod-php5 or cgi?
What about the following:
# echo suhosin.simulation = on /etc/php5/conf.d/suhosin.ini
Restarting the webserver and you will
Hi,
sorry ... from my side (Debian Maintainer), I cant reproduce the
problem. You neither provided logs (suhosin logs to syslog) nor any
example php scripts to verify your problem.
Until I don't have any reproducible facts, I can't anything for you.
Anyways .. maybe the guys from Ubuntu can fix
Ondřej, to clearly pointing out ... you are talking about the php5
package and/or any php5 extention, which causes the Canaries. Suhosin
makes the problem just visible. Please correct me, if I'm wrong.
With kind regards, Jan.
--
Unable to remove Suhosin patch
Bug#579049: fixed in nagios-plugins 1.4.15-2 which was uploaded just
some moments ago
** Also affects: nagios-plugins (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579049
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
bad output from check_linux_raid with RAID0 and linear
Sorry ... using system users within nagios is in my eyes a security
problem, but maybe I'm wrong.
Jan, with his debian nagios maintainers hat on.
--
Integrate nagios users with system ones
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562146
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Bug was reported upstream, see
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=2555775group_id=29880atid=397597
--
nagios check_smtp expects integer instead of double
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318703
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Speaking as Debian Maintainer of the source package php-suhosin, I think you
didn't understand, what the package php5-suhosin stands for.
If you did have a look into the Upstream homepage[1], you can read the
following in the beginning of the page:
Suhosin comes in two independent parts, that
** Changed in: policyd-weight (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
DSBL is gone and needs to be removed from policyd-weight
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278076
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Speaking as the maintainer of the Debian package, I will not include the
patch due various reasons, which I also discussed with Giles. Upstream
also denied integration. Feel free to close the bug, if you don't want
to integrate it into the ubuntu package for your own risk.
--
patch for geoip
This problem was a result of a combination of an updated upstream
release und new debian package in hurry, packages 0.1.14.17-1 did
create a unsecure /var/run/policyd-weight. Removing the file and
restarting the daemon or rebooting fixes the problem.
** Changed in: policyd-weight (Ubuntu)
Anyhow ... packages = 0.1.14-beta-6 did write the mentioned directory
into /tmp/ ... so it should no problem unless you updates directly from
one release to another ... it was just a problem when using hardy when
it was not released and the package was upgraded to this package
version.
So I think
Hi Scott,
just a statement from my (debian maintainer) side. The name is just a result of
upstream package name (which I just did take over). Installing the check
command templates not into /usr/share/nagios-plugins/ but to
/usr/share/nagios-snmp-plugins/ is just normal, since they are related
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #513872
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513872
** Also affects: nagios-snmp-plugins (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513872
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Doesn't follow other plugin
Hi,
upstream stated the following:
The proper fix would rather be using the nagios thresholds functions. OTOH
it's more likely that we put time toward implementing the new thresholds
format than fixing plugins that were never converted to the old one.
Feel free to attach a working patch if you
same here ... seems broken since ages.
--
ebox can't install on Jaunty alpha 4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328716
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Thanks for you bugreport, but I cant find the file you mentioned:
/tmp$ dpkg-source -x nagios-plugins_1.4.12-4ubuntu2.dsc
gpg: Signature made Wed 19 Nov 2008 06:42:40 PM CET using DSA key ID FA14013B
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
dpkg-source: extracting nagios-plugins in
Could you please document, what is your exact error? What are the
symptoms of it? Maybe you got a error message?
--
ps-watcher package bad default ps-prog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486997
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
The script will just fetch the plugins, but some scripts require the
nes-plugins, which are provided by openvas-plugins-base and are binary
packages. So just grabbing the openvas-nvt-sync script will not fully
solve your problem.
--
openvas-server is missing openvas-nvt-sync script
I'm also experiencing this bug with several of my eps files. This seems
to be happening mostly with eps files generated with matplotlib. Once
the same files are converted to pdf or are included inside latex
documents (both ps or pdf output) they display fine. I've filed a bug
upstream (bug 604037
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xfce4-power-manager
Bug description:
When I start my laptop usually the screen brightness is set to minimum. I have
xfce4-power-manager running in e17. However trying to increase the screen
brightness using the function keys fails.
Running
** Attachment added: gdb.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36988864/gdb.txt
--
segfault when changing brighness
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498715
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Sorry, somehow forgot to include that. I'm on Ubuntu Karmic 64bit.
$lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 9.10
Release:9.10
$apt-cache policy xfce4-power-manager
xfce4-power-manager:
Installed: 0.8.4-1ubuntu1
Candidate: 0.8.4-1ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 0.8.4-1ubuntu1 0
This bug should be investigated by dpkg maintainers.
** Project changed: sbcl = dpkg
** Changed in: dpkg
Status: Won't Fix = New
--
dpkg segfaults when installing/upgrading sbcl-doc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393669
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I also would like this bug resolved as I use pytables quite a bit and have to
keep using python2.5 due to this bug.
Ubuntu Karmic 9.1 here.
--
[jaunty] PyTables does not work for Python 2.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348983
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
could you please tell us, which distribution you are using?
--
ps-watcher package bad default ps-prog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486997
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I can confirm this bug. After an upgrade to Karmic evolution-addressbook-export
segfaults. However I only see a segfault when calling
evolution-addressbook-export with an addressbook parameter.
output:
└─(08:58 $)─ evolution-addressbook-export file:///[pathtoaddressbook]
** Attachment added: gdb.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35119289/gdb.txt
--
evolution-addressbook-export fails with Segmentation fault
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I can confirm this bug. Gnome proxy settings are set to automatic proxy
configuration (a pac file location).
Starting epiphany from the CLI results in a message:
*** PAC found, but no active PAC runner! Falling back to direct...
and obviously no page is loading as my network does not allow
Hi,
sorry ... from my side (Debian Maintainer), I cant reproduce the
problem. You neither provided logs (suhosin logs to syslog) nor any
example php scripts to verify your problem.
Until I don't have any reproducible facts, I can't anything for you.
Anyways .. maybe the guys from Ubuntu can fix
policyd-weight defaults| head -47|tail -10|grep -v list.dsbl.org
/etc/policyd-weight.conf /etc/init.d/policyd-weight restart should
do the trick. For more informations have a look into /usr/share/doc
/policyd-weight/README.Debian!
** Changed in: policyd-weight (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
Sorry ... anybody need to upload the package I did upload to testing
(http://packages.debian.org/source/testing/policyd-weight) couple of
days ago. For 8.04 I would suggest the users to read the documentation
and would say the bug is invalid for 8.04.
** Changed in: policyd-weight (Ubuntu)
$ ls -la /usr/share/ipplan/|grep menus
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root27 2008-10-04 15:32 menus -
../php/libphp-phplayersmenu
$ ls -la /usr/share/ipplan/../php/libphp-phplayersmenu
total 56
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 2008-10-04 15:32 .
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2008-10-04 15:32 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1
Just one question in which way is your bug report related to ps-
watcher? It should be related to the package including /bin/ps for
example, shouldn't it?
--
ps -aux command hangs and not displaying proccess tree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195757
You received this bug notification
As one of debian maintainer of the package I would say, you should know
what you are doing when installing the package and aware of the
consequences. Reading the documentation is required for such a package!
** Changed in: php-suhosin (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
configured POST
Ondřej, to clearly pointing out ... you are talking about the php5
package and/or any php5 extention, which causes the Canaries. Suhosin
makes the problem just visible. Please correct me, if I'm wrong.
With kind regards, Jan.
--
Unable to remove Suhosin patch
On Tuesday 30 August 2011 02:21:54 you wrote:
per kees in #ubuntu-devel:
kees smoser: it looks like it's more than just adding it back in, since
they appear to have added vulnerable code now, too.
kees smoser: so you'll need to fix at least the one flaw that the compiler
flags found
are
On Wednesday 07 September 2011 14:52:29 you wrote:
The code wasn't actually vulnerable; GCC couldn't check whenever it was.
I've fixed this in both master and maint-1.4.15. The fix is so trivial
it can be safely applied to any version of the Nagios-Plugins too.
See commit entitled Make GCC
Just one question ... did you have a look into the documentation in
/usr/share/doc/ipplan/, especially into
/usr/share/doc/ipplan/README.Debian?
You can read there:
The default ipplan alias in /etc/ipplan/apache.conf has been disabled to
prevent the alias from affecting every virtual host. Feel
Deep6: To get the menus/ folder appearing, you need to remove the
comment before Alias /ipplan/menus /usr/share/php/libphp-phplayersmenu
in /etc/ipplan/apache.conf.
You have to ways to come to your situation:
* Installing ipplan out of the box, so you should have read
Since no reply in an reasonable time, I just set the bug to invalid.
** Changed in: ps-watcher (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
ps -aux command hangs and not displaying proccess tree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195757
You received this bug notification because you are a
I strongly disagree. At first, if dbus is needed by ebox, it SHOULD on
it. Anyhow ... installing dbus doesn't fix the problem here:
r...@ebox:~# dpkg -l | grep ebox
r...@ebox:~# dpkg -l | grep dbus
ii dbus 1.2.12-0ubuntu2 simple
interprocess messaging
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 686755 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686755
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 686755
package nagvis 1:1.4.6-1 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess
installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück
--
You received
was fixed with 1.1.1-6
** Changed in: nagios-snmp-plugins (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297747
Title:
Doesn't follow other plugin package
there are nagios-plugins which has the binaries
** Changed in: icinga (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693979
Title:
doesn't include check_snmp
On Thursday 03 March 2011 10:49:54 you wrote:
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
*lol* I can't see a vulnerability by installing samba packages, but
anyhow.
Public security bug reported:
Binary package hint: nagios-plugins
I have an internet server. I like to keep as little as
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728328
Title:
nagios plugins depend on samba
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
bug in php5
** Changed in: php-suhosin (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315507
Title:
[jaunty] php5-odbc module broken
--
ubuntu-bugs
Maybe a look into
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contentskeywords=check_snmpmode=arch=any
helps?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693979
Title:
doesn't include check_snmp
Do you guys really think, that using system users would be a good idea?
Do you like to login to the nagios webinterface as root?
--
Integrate nagios users with system ones
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562146
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Sorry ... using system users within nagios is in my eyes a security
problem, but maybe I'm wrong.
Jan, with his debian nagios maintainers hat on.
--
Integrate nagios users with system ones
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562146
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The problem is that adding anything suhosin related to the php.ini
file does not seem to work.
Which php.ini file do you use and do you use libapache2-mod-php5 or cgi?
What about the following:
# echo suhosin.simulation = on /etc/php5/conf.d/suhosin.ini
Restarting the webserver and you will
On Saturday, 5. June 2010, you wrote:
I've uploaded a test package with the 2.6.34 upstream version of the
driver:
http://people.canonical.com/~cndougla/bugs/496093/
Please test it out.
I can confirm, that linux-backports-modules-wireless-2.6.32-22-
generic_2.6.32-22.16~rt28x0_i386.deb
Hi there,
I have uploaded a new package to debian unstable some minutes ago:
ipplan (4.92a-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New Upstream Release
- PHP 5.3 compatibility (LP: #565781)
* Add trailing trunk/ at Vcs-Svn-field
* Update 10_custom_templates.dpatch due upstream changes
The changes
** Also affects: ipplan (Debian)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ipplan (Debian)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
ipplan incompatible with php 5.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565781
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
There is another version between 4.92-1 and 4.92a-1, just uncritical and
minor changes:
ipplan (4.92-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Updating standards version to 3.8.4
- Add README.source
* Migrate Vcs-Fields over to scm.uncompleted.org
* Add 1.0 to debian/source/format
* Fix typo
** Summary changed:
- ipplan incompatible with php 5.3
+ FFE: ipplan incompatible with php 5.3
--
FFE: ipplan incompatible with php 5.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565781
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Hmmm ... just the upstream changes:
$ diff -Nur /tmp/ipplan/CHANGELOG /tmp/ipplan.new/CHANGELOG
--- /tmp/ipplan/CHANGELOG 2009-07-17 00:15:11.0 +0200
+++ /tmp/ipplan.new/CHANGELOG 2009-08-17 23:43:43.0 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,11 @@
-ipplan v4.92
+ipplan v4.92a
+
+Aug 3, 2009
+
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
