Sorry. I only tested against pep8 (1.4.5). The latest version is more
strict.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226100
Title:
Fix FTBFS of aptdaemon 1.1.1 for Saucy
To manage
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1207169 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1207169
Servus Matthias,
PackageKit und Freunde sind nun mit aktuellen Versionen in Ubuntu Saucy
gelandet. Wie auch Listaller in der Version 0.5.8-1.
Danke für die Unterstützung und entschuldige, dass es so lange
I uploaded PackageKit 0.8.10 and aptdaemon 1.1.1. It would be nice if
you could upload the corresponding gnome-packagekit.
** Patch added: gnome-packagekit_3.8.4-ubuntu1.debdiff
** Patch removed: gnome-packagekit_3.8.4-ubuntu1.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-packagekit/+bug/1200303/+attachment/3791209/+files/gnome-packagekit_3.8.4-ubuntu1.debdiff
** Patch added: gnome-packagekit_3.8.4-ubuntu1.debdiff
Public bug reported:
The packagekit transistion has been started.
** Affects: packagekit-qt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Patch added: packagekit-qt_0.8.8-2ubuntu1.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit-qt/+bug/1217699/+attachment/3791210/+files/packagekit-qt_0.8.8-2ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Hello Brian,
Actually this bug is very mysterious to me. There are constantly popping
up questions in the Launchpad answers of aptdaemon. Since it is quite a
hurdle for new users to get from a detail in the policykit dialog that
mentions the name aptdaemon to the Launchpad answer site of the
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Triaged
** Changed in: policykit (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090656
Litian is used to make assumptions about the quality of third party
packages that e.g. have been downloaded from the Internet by the user.
So it is not used as a developer tool in this context.
We could argue if ubuntu-desktop should depend on lintian instead of
aptdaemon itself. But which
Hello Jeremy,
I am still waiting for a reply from Colin. Because the transition will
break the click plugin for packagekit. I can upload packages for both
aptdaemon and packagekit, see ppa:packagekit/0.8
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
@Matthias:
A sync of apper and listaller would be sufficient? I don't see any Ubuntu
specific changes.
What kind of internal API do you mean? I use the GPK tools daily on my
Debian box with aptdaemon.
I uploaded an updated packagekit and aptdaemon package to
ppa:packagekit/0.8
@Colin:
I will
Am 2013-08-12 08:54, schrieb Matthias Klumpp:
GPK, Apper and Listaller can all be synced, I think (if there are no
Ubuntu-specific changes - for GPK, the Ubuntu packages were a sync
from Debian experimental, so merging the new packages from unstable
will work (transition is included)).
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1207169 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1207169
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1207169
Please merge packagekit 0.8.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Thanks
** Affects: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Sebastian Heinlein (glatzor)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned
Am Freitag, den 19.07.2013, 15:32 + schrieb Matthew Paul Thomas:
b. What do you mean by the header from the message? Do you mean the
Replace your changes in... string? Or is there a separate header that
currently isn't being shown?
c. A question mark icon is the least specific icon that
I will upload the release in the next days.
** Branch linked: lp:aptdaemon
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094616
Title:
Update PackageKit interface to 0.8
To manage notifications
Am Donnerstag, den 04.07.2013, 09:47 + schrieb Matthew Paul Thomas:
a. it's closable and maximizable and should be neither
It is maximazable if the changes are expanded. This allows you to see
more changes. If the dialog is resizable it should also support
maximize.
b. the title is
Thomas, the bug did re-occur? Or do you refer to the not fixed version
of session-installer?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1190097
Title:
Nautilus tries but fails to auto-install
Hello Matthias and Jeremy,
I ported aptdaemon to the 0.8 interface at the weekend. All of the PK
tests in aptdaemon pass and I can use pkcon without any problems. My
plan is to extend the test suite and release by the end of the week.
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
You received this bug notification
Unfortunately PackgeKit 0.8.x is blocked because of the missing updated
compat code in aptdaemon. So Fix committed seems to be a better state.
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Triaged
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Committed
--
Oh, the patch did not find its way into the raring release? That is a
pitty.
You don't need to compile anything. Just open /usr/bin/mythbuntu-
control-center in a text editor as root and remove the AptMessageDialog
from the imports. You have to leave the closing bracket.
--
You received this
Am 2013-05-02 08:26, schrieb dino99:
@Sebastian
here with Saucy ( Raring too) both policykit aptdaemon are used. And
the policykit dependants list is much longer then the aptdaemon one.
So maybe you said that we are on the transition way (post #2) for a
possible future design, but right
We are using aptdaemon as the default package manager service and not
packagekitd as Debian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175025
Title:
conflict with python3-aptdaemon.pkcompat
wer should have a session with the unity developers at the next uds.
imho a lot of stuff should be handled at that level.
we could even consider upstart events for the communication.
Launchpad Bug Tracker 528...@bugs.launchpad.net schrieb:
You have been subscribed to a public bug:
If a user
Which file do you want to open? Can you provide more information about
it?
** Also affects: sessioninstaller (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: sessioninstaller (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Fix the detection of the client application in sessioninstaller
** Changed in: sessioninstaller
Status: New = Fix Committed
** Changed in: sessioninstaller (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
** Changed in: rhythmbox
https://launchpad.net/~glatzor/+archive/syncevolution
You can use my packages.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070152
Title:
Local sync (CalDav/CardDav) broken because of missing
Indeed. I just forgot this patch :) Should make sense. The error reports
of the users seem to indicate that there is really something more worse
broken on their system and we only see a side effect here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
Rob Fargher (fargher-gmail) wrote 1 hour ago: #8
Bug is not fixed in Raring.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/mythbuntu-control-centre, line 40, in module
from aptdaemon.gtkwidgets import (AptErrorDialog,
ImportError: cannot import name
The AptMessageDialog was deprecated some time ago, since the concept of
messages was removed from aptdaemon.
The widgets gets imported but is never used.
See the attached patch for a fix.
** Patch added: fix-obsolete-import-of-deprecated-widgets.patch
Sorry, for the noise on this bug. Perhaps it is too early in the morning
here :)
The new issue that you see Rob is the fault of control center. It
imports (but never uses) a deprecated widget from aptdaemon that was
removed in the 1.0 release.
See LP #1158117 for details and a fix.
--
You
Am 2013-03-19 09:37, schrieb Matthew Paul Thomas:
Sebastian, sorry, I don't understand the question. Are you saying the
API lets you search for an application that can open multiple Mime
types? E.g. Find an application that handles both audio/mpeg3 and
application/ogg? If so, what is the use
hello mpt,
but how to handle the case of multiple mime types or gstreamer codecs?
generally not all applications can support all mime types or codecs. so in this
particular case you need to show in the dialog which application supports which
mime type. and perhaps which mime type is not
Sorry, but this is just not enough information to identify or resolve
your issue. Please say what you did, what errors you get and what you
expected.
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1050799 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050799
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1050799
PackageKit compatibility layer tests (tests/test_pk.py) fail if http_proxy
is set
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1054984 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054984
** Information type changed from Private to Public
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1054984
aptd crashed with AssertionError in _assert_bin_mode(): file stream must be
in binary mode
--
How should the error look like, Matthew? This is really a very technical
issue.
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022993
Title:
aptd crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in _emit_acquire_item(): 'utf-8'
codec can't
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1054984 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054984
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1054984
aptd crashed with AssertionError in _assert_bin_mode(): file stream must be
in binary mode
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
We now handle a broken depenency system by having introduced the
FixDepends() method.
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
What language do you use?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060081
Title:
aptd crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in _emit_acquire_item(): 'utf-8'
codec can't decode byte 0x93 in
I am currently working on a 1.0 release of aptdaemon. Afterwards I will
have a look at sessioninstaller.
There is a very akward cornor case: We could find an application that
handles the file type but we don't know the file type :) Because
knowning the type means to have a human name for the
** Changed in: aptdaemon
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1120322
Title:
update-manager crashed with UnboundLocalError in show_diff(): local
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1116503
Title:
Problems installing package signature from Python script
To manage
Sorry, I cannot reproduce the bug by cancelling a transaction, e.g. a
package installation tiggered by the language selector.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101815
Title:
You don't
The grammar was fixed in latest raring.
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101815
Title:
You don't have got
a.) S-C should perform a simulate() before showing the default local
.deb file installation warning
b.)
e.) makes it a little bit more compliacted. only the details in the
error dialog contain translation specific information. Both the title
and the message are only error specific - so they are
The partial upgrade is required if you run the development version. the
pure dependency definitions of the packages are not enough.
we could argue if not every upgrade should be a partial upgrade.
Matthew Paul Thomas m...@canonical.com schrieb:
So we need a confirmation alert listing the
oh i missed the previous discussion.
Matthew Paul Thomas m...@canonical.com schrieb:
So we need a confirmation alert listing the removals, then? Okay,
specification updated.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwarePackageOperations?action=diffrev2=22rev1=21
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
mythubuntu control center uses the ancient python gtk2 bindings. Are
there any plans to go for python3, gtk3 and gobject introspection?
We broke backwards compatibility in aptdaemon. I will try to restore
it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I was hoping that this was a kind of test setup and not a real life
screenshot :/
Having a short look at the code I have to admit that the logic of the
dialog isn't very good. The case in which a file cannot be opened at all
isn't handled. That is why you get this strange dialog.
Unfortunately
Please have a look at the PackageKit API documentation:
The first argument of the PackageKitGlib.Client.install_packages()
method is only_trusted. Just set to false to allow installing
unauthenticated packages.
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 842799 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842799
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 842799
Software installation or update doesn't block session exit
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Oh, there are perhaps even more pieces of bad grammar :)
Would you mind to have a look at sessioninstaller/core.py ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125514
Title:
Wording fix for
Systemd's logind introduced a new DBus interface to inhibit shutdown or
suspend.
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/inhibit
We would need support in unity.
** Also affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: unity (Ubuntu)
We could add this functionality to either gtk3widgets or all the
clients. Depends a little on the direction we want to take with
software-center/unity.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Good idea to use a timeout. Could be implemented on the
aptdaemon/gtk3widgets level.
Sometimes a background task could block your transaction (e.g. fetching
the latest updates) - those background tasks use an apt-get based cron
job. We could detect if it is part of the cron job or if the apt-get
** Also affects: aptdaemon
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Package changed: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) = policykit (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090656
Title:
Am Freitag, den 01.02.2013, 22:42 + schrieb Brian Murray:
This is occurring fairly regularly for users of 12.04 as seen on
errors.ubuntu.com:
https://errors.ubuntu.com/bucket/?id=/usr/sbin/aptd:KeyError:_inline_callbacks:put
Sorry, but I cannot login to erros.ubuntu.com.
--
You
** Changed in: sessioninstaller (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1053155
Title:
Too many windows: 4 windows only for the installation of
For security reasons the short key ID isn't enough. Could you please try
E5E86C008AA65D56 instead.
I will check why we don't get a better error message here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Since we cannot get to the root of the problem - which seems to be
located in GTK+ or Python GI - I would vote to just work arround the
crash.
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Committed
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None = precise-updates
**
** Package changed: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) = apt (Ubuntu)
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1019757
Title:
aptd crashed with SIGSEGV in
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891255
Title:
A failed Run() call doesn't let the transaction fail (e.g.
It seems that your system requires more system memory (RAM) or a larger
swap. Have you seen this error again?
** Information type changed from Private to Public
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I close bug for aptdaemon since I don't see how we could improve the
situation from the daemon side.
The transaction is in the STATUS_WAITING_LOCK state. INMHO software-
center should raise the visibility of this state e.g. by showing a
persistent in-window notification if the transaction is in
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050799
Title:
PackageKit compatibility layer tests (tests/test_pk.py) fail if
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Confirmed
** Changed in: software-center-aptdaemon-plugins (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090656
Title:
Passwords aren't accepted anymore by PolicyKit
To manage notifications
It seems that your D-Bus daemon crashed. This isn't related to
aptdaemon. If you get the problem again, we should fill a bug against
dbus.
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I don't expect that we get the required information
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
** Changed in: aptdaemon
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Package changed: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) = apt (Ubuntu)
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063764
Title:
aptd crashed with SIGSEGV in
Public bug reported:
The PackageKit 0.8 introduced a lot of API changes. We want to support
the new interface.
** Affects: aptdaemon
Importance: High
Status: Triaged
** Affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Status: Triaged
** Changed in: aptdaemon
Public bug reported:
It would be nice to have a tiny GLib based C library available which
also makes use of introspection to provide client libraries to other
progamming languages.
** Affects: aptdaemon
Importance: Medium
Status: Triaged
** Affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Thanks a lot for spotting this error. There seem to be another issue
with downgrades. If the package is marked as auto installed it cannot be
downgraded. You can reproduce this by appliying the extended states
setup in the test_upgrade to test_downgrade.
--
You received this bug notification
The user should be allowed to override any holds, so I have chosen your
second patch.
** Changed in: aptdaemon
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078544
What do you maean by executables? Do you get any details in the error
dialog?
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090153
The libkdewebkit package failed to install at this session: 2012-11-13
15:47:15
And it just stayed in the half-configured state. This is not related to
aptdaemon.
** Package changed: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) = kde4libs (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042368
Title:
aptd crashed with KeyError in put():
It seems that you have got some file system issues on your system.
Please try to re-install the python3-gi package
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
You received this bug
You are using zRam? Could be related to this.
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015718
Title:
package
Pplease ignore the last comment.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042368
Title:
aptd crashed with KeyError in put():
'/org/debian/apt/transaction/2c08d272196f4bcaa1629a98b5d6856d'
http://www.usr-local-share.com/?p=594
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042368
Title:
aptd crashed with KeyError in put():
This should be fixed in Quantal and Raring.
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050055
Title:
aptd crashed with AssertionError in
Sorry, but I cannot analyze the bug with the given information.
Actually all seems to be fine!
Since the error did not occur anymore on a recent Ubuntu version I will
close it.
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because
** Package changed: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) = jockey (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986729
Title:
Erro ao Instalar Drivers FGLRX
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
I tried to reproduce it. And all works fine: Software-center ignores the
error (ERROR_DAEMON_DIED) silently and a crash report is created. The
only problem is that the user doesn't get a notification about the
failed transaction. The progress bar just vanishes and the install
button re-appears.
Am Samstag, den 15.12.2012, 18:02 + schrieb Kevin Leeds:
What would be a good place to look to find definitive information on
file-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile? (In case I am paranoid and don't
trust Google packages much or forum contributions from people not very
well known to me, or
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** No longer affects: aptdaemon
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079895
Title:
Read-only filesystem causes
Public bug reported:
Myself and plenty of others are posting pretty much the same question
and no one is getting a reply. All you're saying is it must be us typing
our passwords wrong but its NOT. Don't try putting the blame off because
you don't know you're software or something. So, how about
Can you specify what you have done before? Did you perform an upgrade?
Install a new Ubuntu version? Gets your password accepted when doing
other administration tasks (e.g. adding a new user in the system
preferences)? Do you use automatic login or do you login with in our
password?
** Also
I changed the bug status to confirmed since there have been several
questions about this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090656
Title:
Passwords aren't accepted anymore by PolicyKit
** Changed in: software-center-aptdaemon-plugins (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Huynh Trung Tin (tinvuong51003405) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619363
Title:
aptdaemon dbus
Do you see this miscalculations often? Can you reproduce them?
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Aptdaemon already shows the name of the binary/application which holds
the lock in the status message: Waiting for XXX to exit Possible
values in real life are aptitude, apt-get, dpkg and synaptic.
The status of the transaction is set to PK_STATUS_ENUM_WAITING_FOR_LOCK
on the PackageKit
** Summary changed:
- Update manager cosmetic flaw
+ tooltip of downloads is too wide (gtk3widgets)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983776
Title:
tooltip of downloads is too wide
The cleanest solution would be to use aptdaemon for the daily updates
and in synaptic. But especially the later one would require a little bit
of work.
Since synaptic runs in the user session and aptdaemon doesn't it isn't
the job of aptdameon to notify the user. Sending Synaptic to the front
Hopefully some first answers:
(a) If you click on a package s-c is opened to install it. the second
dialog is just an error message that the installation tiggered. The
error only appears if you install a package file - it will never appear
if installing from a repository.
(d) The worst kind of
1. If aptdaemon dies because of SEGV we want to know it. So it is ok to
get the apport report for aptdaemon.
2. It is not ok that s-c crashses too. It should show the task cannot
be monitoried ... error dialog. I will have a look at it. SIGKILL could
also do the job to kill aptdaemon.
3. You
If a patient has too many fatal diagnosis to remember, we just say he is
seriously ill. Perhaps we should say to the user: something strange
happened on your computer
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
1 - 100 of 2502 matches
Mail list logo
