[Bug 441109] Re: Contact list is too wide with Russian translation, resize isn't allowed

2009-11-17 Thread mmarkk
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=602189 ** Summary changed: - Width is too big with Russian translation, resize isn't allowed + Contact list is too wide with Russian translation, resize isn't allowed ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #602189

[Bug 441109] Re: Contact list is too wide with Russian translation, resize isn't allowed

2009-11-17 Thread mmarkk
oops :) https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586877 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #586877 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586877 -- Contact list is too wide with Russian translation, resize isn't allowed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441109 You received this bug

[Bug 396015] Re: Invalid range for meters

2009-11-03 Thread mmarkk
** Summary changed: - Invalid maximal range fro meters + Invalid range for meters -- Invalid range for meters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396015 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 470071] [NEW] Listing use locale for date representation

2009-11-01 Thread mmarkk
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vsftpd When vsftpd try to generate directory listing it users current locale (maybe when running internal ls command), so other programs (like Midnight Commander) cannot parse the date. When /sbin/init launch /etc/init.d/vsftpd, all OK because it

[Bug 470071] Re: Listing use locale for date representation

2009-11-01 Thread mmarkk
I mean 3 different solutionis -- Listing use locale for date representation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 470071] Re: Listing use locale for date representation

2009-11-01 Thread mmarkk
I mean 3 different solutionis -- Listing use locale for date representation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 470071] [NEW] Listing use locale for date representation

2009-11-01 Thread mmarkk
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vsftpd When vsftpd try to generate directory listing it users current locale (maybe when running internal ls command), so other programs (like Midnight Commander) cannot parse the date. When /sbin/init launch /etc/init.d/vsftpd, all OK because it

[Bug 311218] Re: intrepid locks up randomly when unattended

2009-10-27 Thread mmarkk
disable screensaver (blck screen). If it helps, bug in 3D drivers. I have the same problem -- intrepid locks up randomly when unattended https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311218 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 453039] Re: generic_delete_inode

2009-10-26 Thread mmarkk
It seems, that it is only warning.. Not error. Something goes through slow path, but works without errorsAnyway, this alert should be fixed. -- generic_delete_inode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453039 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 448559] Re: Try to start my suspended laptop

2009-10-26 Thread mmarkk
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 453039 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453039 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 453039 generic_delete_inode -- Try to start my suspended laptop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448559 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 457003] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/fs/inode.c:1212 generic_delete_inode+0x14e/0x160()

2009-10-25 Thread mmarkk
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 453039 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453039 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 453039 generic_delete_inode -- WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/fs/inode.c:1212 generic_delete_inode+0x14e/0x160()

[Bug 447943] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/fs/inode.c:1212 generic_delete_inode+0x190/0x1a0()

2009-10-25 Thread mmarkk
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 453039 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453039 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 453039 generic_delete_inode -- WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/fs/inode.c:1212 generic_delete_inode+0x190/0x1a0()

[Bug 453039] Re: generic_delete_inode

2009-10-25 Thread mmarkk
Bug easily triaged in virtualbox. -- generic_delete_inode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453039 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 453039] Re: generic_delete_inode

2009-10-25 Thread mmarkk
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/32030/mbox/ There is a solution, but i have not test it. -- generic_delete_inode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453039 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 453039] Re: generic_delete_inode

2009-10-25 Thread mmarkk
** Attachment added: Solution, but I have not tested it. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34369096/e4defrag-and-chattr-e-warnings.patch -- generic_delete_inode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453039 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 453039] Re: generic_delete_inode

2009-10-25 Thread mmarkk
http://www.google.ru/search?q=generic_delete_inode+2.6.31+ext4+chattr -- generic_delete_inode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453039 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 453039] Re: generic_delete_inode

2009-10-25 Thread mmarkk
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14465 ** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #14465 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14465 -- generic_delete_inode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453039 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 405432] Re: gvfsd-metadata crashed with SIGSEGV in copy_tree_to_builder()

2009-10-22 Thread mmarkk
No, nothing special. Just upgraded to karmic koala. It fall after some time after login. i can give you ssh access to my notebook (no any sensible data, root-access), where this happen. -- gvfsd-metadata crashed with SIGSEGV in copy_tree_to_builder() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405432 You

[Bug 452886] Re: gvfsd-metadata crashed with SIGSEGV

2009-10-16 Thread mmarkk
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33777218/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33777219/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33777220/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 452954] [NEW] rotate touchpad when screen rotated

2009-10-16 Thread mmarkk
Public bug reported: When screen rotated on notebook, touchpad does not rotated accordingly. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- rotate touchpad when screen rotated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452954 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 453039] [NEW] generic_delete_inode

2009-10-16 Thread mmarkk
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.31-14-generic Oct 16 17:47:14 mmarkk-laptop kernel: [ 554.606251] [ cut here ] Oct 16 17:47:14 mmarkk-laptop kernel: [ 554.606272] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/fs/inode.c:1212 generic_delete_inode

[Bug 453039] Re: generic_delete_inode

2009-10-16 Thread mmarkk
The command was: find / -xdev -print0 | xargs -r0 chattr +e after converting ext3 to ext4 with tune2fs via sudo tune2fs -O extents,uninit_bg,dir_index /dev/sda1 -- generic_delete_inode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453039 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 363694] Re: firebird2.1-classic compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed

2009-10-15 Thread mmarkk
** Summary changed: - firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed + firebird2.1-classic compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed -- firebird2.1-classic compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363694 You

[Bug 363694] Re: firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed

2009-09-22 Thread mmarkk
I think stack-protector specific functions become 'required' in dynamic linker only when certain constructions used in UDF. If UDF is simple function like 'return sin(x)', this UDF loads perfectly either with stack protector or without. -- firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF

[Bug 363694] Re: firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed

2009-09-13 Thread mmarkk
** Attachment added: This rfunc is .so that works OK with firebird 2.1 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31746715/rfunc.so_work_ok -- firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363694 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 363694] Re: firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed

2009-09-13 Thread mmarkk
** Attachment added: This rfunc is .so that dont't work with firebird 2.1 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31746724/rfunc_dont_work -- firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363694 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 363694] Re: firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed

2009-09-13 Thread mmarkk
Only one difference between compilations is -fno-stack-protector (with this option everything OK). r...@ubuntu:~/rfunc/rfunc/source# gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) 4.3.3 Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.

[Bug 363694] Re: firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed

2009-09-13 Thread mmarkk
The bug appear in: r...@ubuntu:~# dpkg -l | fgrep -i firebird2.1-classic ii firebird2.1-classic 2.1.1.17910-release.ds1-1ubuntu1 Firebird Classic Server - an RDBMS based on ** Changed in: firebird2.1 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = New -- firebird 2.1 compiled

[Bug 423561] [NEW] trackerd loop

2009-09-03 Thread mmarkk
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tracker mma...@mmarkk-desktop:~/src/tracker$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 mma...@mmarkk-desktop:~/src/tracker$ apt-cache policy tracker tracker: Установлен: 0.6.93-0ubuntu3 Кандидат

[Bug 423561] Re: trackerd loop

2009-09-03 Thread mmarkk
** Attachment added: trackerd-cores.tbz2 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31266965/trackerd-cores.tbz2 -- trackerd loop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423561 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 396015] Re: Invalid maximal range fro meters

2009-07-29 Thread mmarkk
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=590107 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #590107 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=590107 -- Invalid maximal range fro meters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396015 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 396006] [NEW] There are no important hard drive (block device) meters

2009-07-06 Thread mmarkk
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-system-monitor 1. Drive speeds (Block device read and writes in MB/s). 2. Drive load average - so user can see how his drive is loaded -- how many processes need IO operations on drive. Average for 1 minute, 5 and 15 - as for processor. point 1

[Bug 396006] Re: There are no important hard drive (block device) meters

2009-07-06 Thread mmarkk
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28726199/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28726200/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28726201/ProcStatus.txt -- There are

[Bug 396010] [NEW] Different units/percentage in hints of the meters

2009-07-06 Thread mmarkk
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-system-monitor Now, information from hints of the meters in applet: 1. CPU load - percentage 2. Memory - percentage 3. Network load - MB/S 4. Swap - percentage 5. load average - by value 6. Hard drive - percentage. I think, every hint should

[Bug 396015] [NEW] Invalid maximal range fro meters

2009-07-06 Thread mmarkk
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-system-monitor For example, for my Gigabit net, maximal range for network throughput should be always 1 Gigabit, if low-level link established as 1 Gbit, and 100 Mbit if link established as 100 mbit. The same triaged for hard drive. My hard drive

[Bug 396006] Re: There are no important hard drive (block device) meters

2009-07-06 Thread mmarkk
Upstream bug added by me. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587871 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #587871 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587871 -- There are no important hard drive (block device) meters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396006 You received this bug

[Bug 375395] Re: scrolling only by full line height

2009-06-23 Thread mmarkk
I have attached document ** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- scrolling only by full line height https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375395 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 375395] Re: scrolling only by full line height

2009-06-23 Thread mmarkk
** Attachment added: test.ods http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28234307/test.ods -- scrolling only by full line height https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375395 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 375395] Re: scrolling only by full line height

2009-06-23 Thread mmarkk
The problem exists on any document. During the scrolling, Calc will scroll full cell at once. I need smooth scrolling (by any amount of pixels, not cells) as all other programs do. I think, such option should be in preferences. -- scrolling only by full line height

[Bug 375395] Re: scrolling only by full line height

2009-06-23 Thread mmarkk
Also, while scrolling attached document..CPU usage is 100% during 1-5 seconds -- scrolling only by full line height https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375395 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 375395] Re: scrolling only by full line height

2009-05-12 Thread mmarkk
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26632893/Dependencies.txt -- scrolling only by full line height https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375395 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 375395] [NEW] scrolling only by full line height

2009-05-12 Thread mmarkk
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org If I have spreadsheet document with large, multiline cells, I can't scroll to distance equal some part of line. full line is scrolled at once. There is no option in preferences about scrolling by line (as in Excel) and scrolling by

Re: [Bug 363694] Re: firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed

2009-05-08 Thread mmarkk
What is meaning of bug state 'fix released' ? there is no bug, or bug will be closed on next build ? please describe, or give me the link. -- firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363694 You received this bug notification because you

Re: [Bug 363694] Re: firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed

2009-05-08 Thread mmarkk
rfunc was compiled on the same PC. I will post my rfunc.so later (2-3 days) when i get access to that server. -- firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 366276] Re: could sort the contact list by protocol rather than categories

2009-04-29 Thread mmarkk
Please underatnd me right. If i have three coneections to ICQ, my contact list need to be visually divided into 3 vertical sections. Every section may contain groups of contacts from icq account of such section. I will attach screenshot of QIP instant messenger. -- could sort the contact list

[Bug 366276] Re: could sort the contact list by protocol rather than categories

2009-04-29 Thread mmarkk
** Attachment added: Please see how the groups should appear http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26151006/qip_screenshot.jpg -- could sort the contact list by protocol rather than categories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 366276] Re: Divide contact list by accounts

2009-04-29 Thread mmarkk
** Summary changed: - could sort the contact list by protocol rather than categories + Divide contact list by accounts -- Divide contact list by accounts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

Re: [Bug 366235] Re: system monitor uses incorrect network speed (throughput) units

2009-04-27 Thread mmarkk
should always specified in some units of bits/sec (kbits,mbits per second). The speed of downloading a file may be specified in KiB/sec. is's OK, but not for netowrk device throughput. Please fix. At least add option into preferences... mma...@mmarkk-ubuntu:~$ LANG=C lsb_release -rd Description

Re: [Bug 366235] Re: system monitor uses incorrect network speed (throughput) units

2009-04-27 Thread mmarkk
may be specified in KiB/sec. is's OK, but not for netowrk device throughput. Please fix. At least add option into preferences... mma...@mmarkk-ubuntu:~$ LANG=C lsb_release -rd Description:    Ubuntu 8.10 Release:        8.10 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10

[Bug 366235] Re: system monitor uses incorrect network speed (throughput) units

2009-04-27 Thread mmarkk
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580471 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #580471 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580471 -- system monitor uses incorrect network speed (throughput) units https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366235 You received this bug notification because

Re: [Bug 366235] Re: system monitor uses incorrect network speed (throughput) units

2009-04-25 Thread mmarkk
in some units of bits/sec (kbits,mbits per second). The speed of downloading a file may be specified in KiB/sec. is's OK, but not for netowrk device throughput. Please fix. At least add option into preferences... mma...@mmarkk-ubuntu:~$ LANG=C lsb_release -rd Description:    Ubuntu 8.10

[Bug 366235] [NEW] system monitor uses incorrect network speed units

2009-04-24 Thread mmarkk
/sec is incorrect. The network throughput should always specified in some units of bits/sec (kbits,mbits per second). The speed of downloading a file may be specified in KiB/sec. is's OK, but not for netowrk device throughput. Please fix. At least add option into preferences... mma...@mmarkk-ubuntu

[Bug 366235] Re: system monitor uses incorrect network speed units

2009-04-24 Thread mmarkk
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25935423/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25935424/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25935426/ProcStatus.txt -- system

[Bug 366276] [NEW] combined list disable option

2009-04-24 Thread mmarkk
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pidgin There is no option to divide contact list to multiple accounts. By default, all group of all accounts get mixed!! For example, plase see, how the Qip! (qip.ru) messenger realize that! ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu

[Bug 366276] Re: combined list disable option

2009-04-24 Thread mmarkk
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25937283/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25937285/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25937288/ProcStatus.txt -- combined

[Bug 366235] Re: system monitor uses incorrect network speed units

2009-04-24 Thread mmarkk
NO! there are many bugs about units used in free space of file systems. i did not find duplicate bugs about network throughput. ** Changed in: gnome-system-monitor (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- system monitor uses incorrect network speed units https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366235

Re: [Bug 366235] Re: system monitor uses incorrect network speed units

2009-04-24 Thread mmarkk
... mma...@mmarkk-ubuntu:~$ LANG=C lsb_release -rd Description:    Ubuntu 8.10 Release:        8.10 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-system-monitor Package: gnome-system-monitor 2.24.1-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron:  LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8

[Bug 366235] Re: system monitor uses incorrect network speed (throughput) units

2009-04-24 Thread mmarkk
** Summary changed: - system monitor uses incorrect network speed units + system monitor uses incorrect network speed (throughput) units ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 80780 uses unusual units to report memory and disk sizes -- system monitor uses incorrect network speed

[Bug 363694] Re: firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed

2009-04-23 Thread mmarkk
** Description changed: Binary package hint: firebird2.1-classic firebird-2.1 classic is compiled with -fno-stack-protector, so any third-party UDF compiled with default gcc options are not loaded by firebird at runtime. and firebird said (Exmple for TANH function in common rfunc

[Bug 363694] Re: firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed

2009-04-20 Thread mmarkk
** Summary changed: - firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF open failed + firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed ** Description changed: Binary package hint: firebird2.1-classic firebird-2.1 classic is compiled with -fno-stack-protector, so

[Bug 363694] [NEW] firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF open failed

2009-04-19 Thread mmarkk
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firebird2.1-classic firebird-2.1 classic is compiled with -fno-stack-protector, so any third-party UDF compiled with default gcc options are not loaded by firebird at runtime. and firebird said: -function TANH is not defined -module name or entrypoint