certainly be
prioritized accordingly.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@u
this script, and if so, are
you attached to the non-"batch" mode? If not, I would like to make the
"batch" mode the mode, dropping the requirement for the --batch argument.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
y.
You *personally* think that there should be such a policy. Many other
Debian maintainers would be very angry to receive such notifications. And
we currently don't have any mechanism for such notifications that would not
impose an additional burden on the archive admins, which I'm not willing t
s for mrbuild, since that package has
other reverse-build-dependencies in noble (libdogleg, mrgingham, vnlog)
which should not be allowed to regress; but provided there is a proper SRU
test case to assert this, I think it's a sensible path towards letting mrcal
back in the archive for 24.04.
--
Stev
hile logged in can be viewed
> anonymously and a paste created anonymously (e.g. by pastebinit, which I
> don't think supports logging in?) requires a login to view.
Ok, I was unaware of this nuance. That being the case, I don't think "login
required" is a sound argument for
SION side is sufficient reason to
change the default pastebin, then that of course isn't something we should
second-guess; we don't need to be reinvesting anonymous ftp servers. But in
that case, I think there should have been a discussion about who the default
behavior is for, because for my part it
't like this pointing to a service we
don't control.
And if there are issues with the usability of paste.ubuntu.com, uh, we own
that service? So let's work with our IS team to make it fit for purpose.
(I don't know why it currently requires a login to *view* paste contents;
that seems straightforwardl
On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
--
Steve Langasek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
ubuntu-devel-announce mailing list
ubuntu-devel-announce@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-announce
>
> Thanks, Matthias
>
> --
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian D
e Team,
--
Steve Langasek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
ubuntu-devel-announce mailing list
ubuntu-devel-announce@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-announce
you verify that the previous version of the package in Ubuntu builds in
noble?
See also https://bugs.debian.org/1059658
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
> https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server/+git/ubuntu-helpers/tree/rbasak/clear-review-slot.py
Please submit this to ubuntu-dev-tools :-)
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubun
ly but it fails to
> build on LP due to dh_missing complaining.
Are you using up-to-date debhelper on noble? There have been recent changes
in debhelper's handling of systemd units, precisely for the /lib vs /usr/lib
question.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough an
are dropping
the patch, it would seem to have the opposite effect to what you've written.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
releases, and the release upgrade is the
time for the user to discover this is the case and deal with it (as part of
a maintenance window).
Otherwise, you're really just shifting the pain. Ubuntu X went EOL, I have
to reinstall, I install Ubuntu X+1 which is what I had installed before, why
are things
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 08:20:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 05:22:37PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Removing obsolete NBS kernels from trusty as described in June [1] went
> > without any problems being reported.
> > I am therefor
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 05:22:37PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Removing obsolete NBS kernels from trusty as described in June [1] went
> without any problems being reported.
> I am therefore planning to proceed with the same cleanup now of NBS kernels
> from xenial-{updates,sec
need to be retained
because 16.04.7 was an update only for UEFI architectures (amd64 and arm64).
I am planning to start removing the other NBS kernels from xenial this
coming Friday, December 15.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
ssible.
We typically wouldn't even do a +really upload, but instead just remove the
broken version from -proposed.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the wo
utely no clue how I would go about doing this, and suspect it's not
> even possible.
It is not possible.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
d the volunteer
> support in #ubuntu and #ubuntu-next would not be too keen to lose that one.
> But, again, that's a discussion to be had with the IRC council.
What would be the process for asking #ubuntu-motu to be closed/redirected?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
track record of active maintenance of the stable release of
a flavor goes a long way to establishing that the flavor team is delivering
something that meets users' needs for an LTS.)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
ate with other flavors to synchronize your support committments,
that's fine. And there is certainly prior art.
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2016-April/002213.html
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to
?).
I'd therefore like to propose we close this mailing list and forward the
address on to ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com, which at least has a
larger subscriber base and is more likely to result in users getting help
with their questions.
Opinions?
--
Steve Langasek Give
eld for this. If we are going to change the
Sources file at all, the existing "Vcs-Git" field already has the correct
semantics.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu
thread together.
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 00:13, Steve Langasek
> wrote:
> > To be clear, it would make a lot of things easier if we did determine we
> > could drop not only BIOS boot support from our images, but also El-Torito
> > ISO boot support treating these imag
s only for flashing on USB drives.
It would remove one significant barrier for us adopting ubuntu-image for the
mastering of our installer images. But we should do the work to establish
that these things are no longer needed!
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 06:38:06PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 04:53:05PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 03:22:59PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > > Moreover, there are other use cases beyond test failure fixing.
&
the main archive and all have
to be run again, and it's the second run that actually matters for
proposed-migration.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu
to facilitate Ubuntu
development, for things not yet landed in the main archive. It certainly
shouldn't be used for long-lived PPAs whose contents are not targeted for
inclusion in Ubuntu.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
o the
> classic sources.list, you should be able to do so with:
> $ cp /etc/apt/sources.list{.distUpgrade,}
> $ rm /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ubuntu.sources
Is this entry in the mantic release notes still accurate?
* add-apt-repository now adds PPAs as deb822 .sources files (Improvements to
PPA
es. I would recommend simply
dropping them rather than marking them optional, since if they come back
again that indicates a DIFFERENT problem.
If you need something upstreamable to Debian, then you'll need to mark them
optional since Debian unstable is still on glibc 2.37.
--
Steve Langasek
ersioned Depends: for some reason, it should be sufficient to
manually add one.
There had previously been mention on IRC of declaring Breaks: between libc6
and the packages. However, having thought this through just now I believe
that's unnecessary, and also doesn't actually adequately
Please keep the NBS report in mind as well:
https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/nbs.html
There has not been much progress on this list for roughly a month, and there
are lots of packages here needing active attention of the kind that would
not be blocked by a glibc migration :)
Thank
nt for someone to create a doc that distills this for just the
Ubuntu architectures.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
on armhf will have more memory available
than on other architectures. But that memory is also shared across tests,
so "noisy neighbor" effect is more of a problem.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
property that we haven't tampered with
the last-known-good kernel and makes the system less resilient.
We should prioritize resilience of boot recovery over reducing the size of
/boot contents.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Develope
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 06:40:16PM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> canonistack isn't an option.
Why? Do we need to open RTs?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the wo
ubuntu-23.10 980
$
Evidently there is something different in the way desktop-common is being
handled for Edubuntu and Ubuntu Studio, that it's not being seeded there.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can
cate request check is
> disabled. I made this quick change to unblock ginggs
Excellent, thank you!
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 5:19 AM Steve Langasek
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Tim,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 11:10:05AM +0100, Tim Andersson wrote:
> > > Hi al
nt as build-time deps).
So this is a very common pattern for rust packages.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://w
work
> seamlessly but always expect the unexpected right :)
Does the code also properly distinguish between tests queued with proposed=1
and those without, so that it's possible to queue both ways in parallel?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Fre
or should
remain unchanged for existing kernel+firmware packages, and it's therefore
safe to push more widely.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu
he
zstd support onto jammy's 5.15 kernel.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slang
I understand the reason for being concerned about keeping uncompressed
firmware available is that not all kernels have support for compressed
firmware. However we should work out a path that lets us switch to
compressed firmware on releases where we know it's supported. What kernel
version intro
ightweight process is to ask on #ubuntu-release on IRC
for an archive admin to remove the binaries in such cases.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
> Will the user still be able to add further modules and will machine specific
> configuration files (e.g. for booting from iSCSI) still be included into the
> initrd?
I think a robust implementation of this on the initramfs-tools side looks
like:
- identify all the contents that belong
>
> > The drawback is that building the kernel would take longer, the package
> > takes more space on the archive and mirrors, and downloading them could
> > take longer on slow connections.
> >
> > Implementing my proposal would be relative easy for ini
an build needs to be adjusted for
> this.
> I have proposed a PR to fix this in Ubuntu, and forwarded to Debian.
Looks like this has been sponsored.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:55:21PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 02:36:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I think the least-effort approach is for the handling of MPs for sponsorship
> > to match the handling of bugs: ~ubuntu-sponsors is unsubsc
as Robie
proposes, but to filter out any MPs from the sponsorship queue which have a
negative review from a sponsor, and no further activity on the MP (either
comments or commits) after that point.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
clear
which ones those are.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubun
Buy-in and adoption of
git-ubuntu as a tool is a necessary precondition for us getting away from
working with source packages, so in my view we have to approach this
incrementally.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 03:29:11PM +0200, Paride Legovini wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote on 13/06/2023:
> > This is the following in my ~/.gitconfig:
> > [url "git+ssh://vor...@git.launchpad.net/"]
> > insteadof = lp:
> > This configur
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 12:55:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Well, we found out that removing all NBS kernel packages for stable series
> was not altogether without its problems for users. We have modified the
> removal policy going forward in response to feedback.
ian/ruby-tests.rake, uploaded, forwarded to Debian.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.
is
> probably fairly difficult but a crude one that is ~60% enough would
> probably a matter of minutes.
Any objections to this being under a --verbose flag?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, a
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 09:27:47PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 06:41:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > As git-ubuntu sees increasing use, including for such things as requests for
> > sponsorship of Debian merges, I've had an itch to sc
ng it out of the queue and then you also don't need to be listed
as a separate approver.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
Just offering some
suggestions on how we can do a better job of automating C++ ABI checks than
we're doing today.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
-* fields.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
)
- getting the correct options to dpkg-buildpackage by hand for a package
merge is tedious; this automates -v and -sa arguments.
Enjoy,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu
ying on mongodb server. So it should expand the
> ignore list.
>
> Patch https://launchpad.net/bugs/2022332, forwarded to
> https://bugs.debian.org/1037035
Uploaded.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
for removals of generic & lts-xenial kernels.
Thanks for pointing this out, I naively assumed that we had rebuilt d-i in
trusty against the last kernels published there before moving to ESM.
I've locally implemented a stay of execution for the above kernel package
versions.
--
Steve Langa
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 09:40:02AM -0700, Simon Chopin wrote:
> See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-gio/+bug/2020880
> See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-graphene-sys/+bug/2020902
Thanks for tagging these update-excuse!
--
Steve Langasek G
t...)
> ((Clearly we need something like germinate to generate the component
> mismatches reports. But maybe not at image build time?))
That's already run on ubuntu-archive-toolbox independently of the image
builds, so would continue to do so.
--
Steve Langasek G
gt; 3.6.3-1fakesync1 with only the version number changed.
For future reference, copy-package from lp:ubuntu-archive-tools lets you
resuscitate source packages with their binaries, in this case by doing:
copy-package -b -s lunar-proposed --to-suite mantic-proposed -e 3.6.3-1 \
matplotl
n building with PROPOSED=1) to get germinate to look at
all the right pockets.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https:/
els?
The general policy for apport is to disallow bug report submissions if the
executable or any of the loaded libraries are from out-of-date packages.
But it will still be possible to download these older packages from
Launchpad: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+publishinghis
NBS kernel packages on an ongoing basis, not just at EOL time.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@
r, as that's what's actually
required to resolve the issues - few will read your email on ubuntu-devel in
depth, fewer will remember what your analysis was (or be able to find it
later). As a result, it's more efficient overall to work deeply on a small
number of packages to drive them to comple
/+bug/2015305
>
> The ruby-oauth2 migration will also allow ruby-omniauth-google-oauth2
> migration.
Removed!
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubunt
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 05:34:10PM +, Alexander Koskovich wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Which branches are you looking to submit to? There are lots of branches
> > that unfortunately we don't have monitoring of. MPs are great, but I
> > wouldn't want you to do wor
time, so sometimes a ping on IRC
(#ubuntu-devel@libera) or email is productive.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www
fically, LTO-enabled archs).
Patched, submitted to Debian.
* `cppad`: binary-indep build fails in Ubuntu and Debian. Removed from
-proposed, let the maintainer take care of it.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set i
decide not to invest time in testing
against a kernel that is not the final kernel for the release, where you
believe that will result in wasted time due to false-positives.
But 6.1 is also not the final kernel for the release, so I don't see any
reason that being at parity with the generic ker
decide not to invest time in testing
against a kernel that is not the final kernel for the release, where you
believe that will result in wasted time due to false-positives.
But 6.1 is also not the final kernel for the release, so I don't see any
reason that being at parity with the generic ker
se.
Flavors are required to hit a beta milestone and a release milestone. How
they conduct their activities to ensure that these milestones are releasable
is for them to decide.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Devel
se.
Flavors are required to hit a beta milestone and a release milestone. How
they conduct their activities to ensure that these milestones are releasable
is for them to decide.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Devel
s --libs
> /usr/bin/python3-dbg-config: 117: Syntax error: Unterminated quoted string
> I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.11/+bug/2009967
> with a patch. I would prefer if foundations uploaded this, as the
> package is currently a sync, and I don't want to inadvertentl
et access, or if we
instead manually mark as bad tests those that have requirements our testbeds
don't meet. We can have the discussion with Debian about whether to have a
more nuanced distinction between a 'needs-internet' restriction and a
'fails-to-honor-proxy' restriction, but that'
doing signature verification of the payload. It does not
disable the use of kexec as a feature.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
divergences in the installed system would simply be a
bug.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
nk the issues were unrelated to this package. Due to the size of the
> queues, I didn't ask for re-triggers.
This package has since migrated. I guess someone did retrigger and it
passed.
Please don't be shy about retriggering because of the queues; the tests get
run eventually...
--
Steve L
ckages from the NEW queue and synced the package from
> > jammy with the following commands:
> >
> > $ copy-package --auto-approve -y -b -s jammy --to-suite lunar-proposed \
> > -e 0.17.0+ds-2 nim-regex
> > $ copy-package --auto-approve -y -b -s jammy --to-suite
ar-proposed \
-e 0.17.0+ds-2 nim-regex
$ copy-package --auto-approve -y -b -s jammy --to-suite lunar-proposed \
-e 0.5.1-2 nim-unicodeplus
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
pected across release upgrades.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
n't find fault with the implementation. So we'll move
forward with this approach.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
is
redundant for newer releases, I don't immediately see anything incorrect
there. If you can point out where it's wrong, I'll happily edit it to
correct it but I don't have time just now to run through the full
instructions there to find out what doesn't work.
--
Steve Langasek Give
inks in /etc/timezone
or /etc/localtime. Even if the debconf automation never presented these as
options to the user, we shouldn't break the default system timezone on
upgrade.
You may already have this in your plan, so just making sure!
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long eno
sed-cluster in anger for about a month now, and
it's given me quicker insight into what's happening in -proposed that needs
attention.
Please kick the tires. Suggestions for improvement welcome.
Enjoy,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
picked up
soon.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:15:21PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> On Monday, November 21 2022, I wrote:
> > On Monday, November 21 2022, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:32:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> >>>
estions. We will start the election on 6 December. All five seats
> > (besides Mark) will be filled.
> >
> > Here is the list of candidates (by alphabetical order of surname):
> >
> > - Sebastien Bacher
> > - Robie Basak
> > - Ben Collins
> > - Stev
> Here is the list of candidates (by alphabetical order of surname):
>
> - Sebastien Bacher
> - Robie Basak
> - Ben Collins
> - Steve Langasek
> - Lukas Märdian
> - Alex Murray
> - Simon Quigley
> - Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
> - Łukasz Zemczak
>
> If any questions arise,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 05:06:30PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Second, even though the above should already pick up more packages from
> -proposed that we need, I've also added --all-proposed, saying to grab all
> packages from -proposed. Two reasons for this:
FYI, although this i
for reasons discussed in other threads
wrt kinetic-security vs kinetic release pocket used when bootstrapping the
autopkgtest images for the new dev series, would not necessarily be a useful
base for trying to reproduce some of these more inscrutable autopkgtest
failures.
--
Steve Langasek
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 09:17:55AM -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:41:23PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hi Sergio,
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:32:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > This is a heads up tha
t them migrated.
Hopefully, the autopkgtest backlogs on arm64 and s390x will clear this week
and then we'll have a better view on what it takes to finish the above
in-progress transitions, and then rebuild anything still linking against
libldap-2.5-0.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
ample, the following in "lp-shell
> production devel" would do it for all supported Ubuntu series:
>
> for name in ("bionic", "focal", "hirsute", "impish", "jammy"):
> series = lp.distributions["ubuntu"].getSeries(name_or_versi
1 - 100 of 599 matches
Mail list logo
