Re: Putting security-based applications as a separate menu entry rather than in Accessories

2007-05-17 Thread Sebastian Heinlein
Am Donnerstag, den 17.05.2007, 00:49 +0530 schrieb shirish: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, What do you guys think of putting things like keyring manager, GPA (GNU Privacy Assistant), Seahorse, and other security-based softwares in a separate menu entry titled

Re: Putting security-based applications as a separate menu entry rather than in Accessories

2007-05-17 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 12:49:50AM +0530, shirish wrote: Hi all, What do you guys think of putting things like keyring manager, GPA (GNU Privacy Assistant), Seahorse, and other security-based softwares in a separate menu entry titled Security where all security-based tools including

Re: we should set a grub password by default

2007-05-17 Thread Matthew Larsen
Hi all I think putting a password by default on the grub booter just adds another level of unnecessary complexity for users. Enabling it by default you force people to learn another password which they then have to type in every time you boot etc etc. I think a better option would be to allow

Re: we should set a grub password by default

2007-05-17 Thread Sven
Am Donnerstag, den 17.05.2007, 11:03 +0100 schrieb Matthew Larsen: Hi all I think putting a password by default on the grub booter just adds another level of unnecessary complexity for users. Enabling it by default you force people to learn another password which they then have to type in

Introduction and Lexmark Printer Driver

2007-05-17 Thread tim
Hi Everyone, I am new to this list and would like to introduce myself. My name is Timothy Armstrong and I have been a software developer for about 10 years now. I mainly develop in Delphi/Pascal but have knowledge in other areas as well. My linux experience is quite a bit less, I have been

RFC: alias tar=tar --backup ?

2007-05-17 Thread Micah Cowan
A user, timothy, describing his difficulties at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/113154 describes his frustration as a new user, in discovering the hard way that tar's default is to overwrite existing files, causing him to lose important data. While I'm opposed to fixing the problem in

Re: RFC: alias tar=tar --backup ?

2007-05-17 Thread Onno Benschop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/05/07 06:18, Micah Cowan wrote: A user, timothy, describing his difficulties at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/113154 describes his frustration as a new user, in discovering the hard way that tar's default is to overwrite existing

Re: RFC: alias tar=tar --backup ?

2007-05-17 Thread Jan Claeys
Op donderdag 17-05-2007 om 15:18 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Micah Cowan: A user, timothy, describing his difficulties at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/113154 describes his frustration as a new user, in discovering the hard way that tar's default is to overwrite existing files,

Re: RFC: alias tar=tar --backup ?

2007-05-17 Thread Micah Cowan
Jan Claeys wrote: Op donderdag 17-05-2007 om 15:18 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Micah Cowan: A user, timothy, describing his difficulties at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/113154 describes his frustration as a new user, in discovering the hard way that tar's default is to

Re: RFC: alias tar=tar --backup ?

2007-05-17 Thread Onno Benschop
On 18/05/07 08:25, Micah Cowan wrote: Jan Claeys wrote: Op donderdag 17-05-2007 om 15:18 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Micah Cowan: A user, timothy, describing his difficulties at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/113154 describes his frustration as a new user, in

Re: RFC: alias tar=tar --backup ?

2007-05-17 Thread Micah Cowan
Onno Benschop wrote: On 18/05/07 06:18, Micah Cowan wrote: A user, timothy, describing his difficulties at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/113154 describes his frustration as a new user, in discovering the hard way that tar's default is to overwrite existing files, causing him to

Re: RFC: alias tar=tar --backup ?

2007-05-17 Thread Soren Hansen
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 06:03:18PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote: A completely different approach could be that the calls that actually write to a file check that the file does not exist. You could activate this with a system-wide flag, but I strongly suspect that this would be more work than

RE: Introduction and Lexmark Printer Driver

2007-05-17 Thread Chris Jones
Hi Tim. Welcome to the Ubuntu Development Mailing List. I used to have a Lexmark printer and found that Lexmark has great lack of support for Linux drivers for their products. I am glad to here that somebody (such as yourself) is willing to give it a shot of developing a driver for the Linux

Re: RFC: alias tar=tar --backup ?

2007-05-17 Thread Alex Jones
A new CLI version of file-roller would rock. We need more CLI-GUI code/concept/functionality sharing. Other candidates include gnome-system-monitor (vs. top) and nautilus (so you could browse DAV on the CLI, just like you do local file systems, for example). On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 15:18 -0700,

Re: RFC: alias tar=tar --backup ?

2007-05-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday 17 May 2007 18:18, Micah Cowan wrote: A user, timothy, describing his difficulties at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/113154 describes his frustration as a new user, in discovering the hard way that tar's default is to overwrite existing files, causing him to lose

Re: RFC: alias tar=tar --backup ?

2007-05-17 Thread Micah Cowan
Soren Hansen wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 06:03:18PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote: A completely different approach could be that the calls that actually write to a file check that the file does not exist. You could activate this with a system-wide flag, but I strongly suspect that this would be

Re: RFC: alias tar=tar --backup ?

2007-05-17 Thread Micah Cowan
Scott Kitterman wrote: On Thursday 17 May 2007 18:18, Micah Cowan wrote: A user, timothy, describing his difficulties at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/113154 describes his frustration as a new user, in discovering the hard way that tar's default is to overwrite existing files,

RFC: alias tar=tar --backup ?

2007-05-17 Thread William Tracy
Yes. Well, the user expects the computer to do what it is told, too, but doesn't realize that without flags like --backup or -k, he has implicitly told the computer to go ahead and write over anything it sees. Apparently tar -w gives you interactive mode. Unfortunately, when it finds an