Bryce Harrington pisze:
The Ubuntu's blueprints page currently lists over 2000 specs.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu
Some of them are implemented, but not marked as such.
Some of them have been deferred, but are not marked as such.
Some of them became obsolete.
And finally some of them
Yesterday I was met, with what I think is one of the most stupid bugs I
ever found.
When I tried to eject a DVDr, either using nautilus tools or the drive
eject button, an error popup showed up, telling me that I wasn't root.
WTF, now I can't even eject CDs?
I had a look at my user permitions
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:51:59PM +0100, Sam Tygier wrote:
David Prieto wrote:
Some time ago, I posted this idea on Ubuntu Brainstorm, about the
possibility to use a separate /home folder by default on systems where,
depending on free disk space, it is considered advisable.
The main
Hi again,
Ubiquity can now install onto a partition that has an existing home
directory without deleting it. It just removes the system directories.
Do you have to do anything special for that to work? I usually keep
my /home in a separate partition, but I have another partition with some
Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
Notifications are never read, especially by users that are not
passionate by computers - they're exactly like there was no message at
all, only they annoy users: click OK and then see if there's a problem
is what OS have used people to for many years. And after that
Le mardi 13 mai 2008 à 11:22 +0200, Oliver Grawert a écrit :
hi,
Am Montag, den 12.05.2008, 23:14 +0200 schrieb Milan Bouchet-Valat:
I'd like to raise the developers' awareness about bug 59695 [1]: High
frequency of load/unload cycles on some hard disks may shorten lifetime
please see
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 09:51:29PM +0200, David Prieto wrote:
Hi again,
Ubiquity can now install onto a partition that has an existing home
directory without deleting it. It just removes the system directories.
Do you have to do anything special for that to work? I usually keep
my
On Tue, 13 May 2008 19:32:23 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, they won't, and shouldn't. Why pay some idiot corporation an
extortion fee just because they bribed the browser manufacturers to
include their certs by default? There is NO added security to having a
paid for cert.
In
The rather larger problem is that the little lock is generally presumed by
users to mean much more than it does. Emphasizing cert validity only
compounds the problem. As an example, after today I'd be rather more
concerned if I didn't get an unknown cert warning from a Debian site than
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 00:33 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 09:51:29PM +0200, David Prieto wrote:
Hi again,
Ubiquity can now install onto a partition that has an existing home
directory without deleting it. It just removes the system directories.
Do you have
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 16:24 -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
No, they won't, and shouldn't. Why pay some idiot corporation an
extortion fee just because they bribed the browser manufacturers to
include their certs by
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 08:32 +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 03:37 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 08:28 +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
Do you have a link to the discussion? Were things suposed to be any
better in Hardy?
hi,
Am Dienstag, den 13.05.2008, 22:42 +0200 schrieb Milan Bouchet-Valat:
Le mardi 13 mai 2008 à 11:22 +0200, Oliver Grawert a écrit :
hi,
Am Montag, den 12.05.2008, 23:14 +0200 schrieb Milan Bouchet-Valat:
I'd like to raise the developers' awareness about bug 59695 [1]: High
frequency
13 matches
Mail list logo
