On 6 Jun 2009, at 11:13, David MENTRE wrote:
For the record, I have opened a bunch of bug reports to request
rebuild
of needed packages:
Hi David,
In order to get the attention of the sponsors to upload the change,
you should subscribe the ubuntu-universe-sponsors or ubuntu-main-
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Martin Owensdocto...@gmail.com wrote:
No, it isn't. HTTP is by definition over port 80 - or perhaps 8080:
Is it? I didn't think is was the port that defined the protocol but the
nature of the messages sent over the connection. The port is a default
but not a
Il giorno sab, 06/06/2009 alle 23.55 -0400, Martin Owens ha scritto:
Is it? I didn't think is was the port that defined the protocol but
the
nature of the messages sent over the connection. The port is a default
but not a requirement, like ssh or ftp.
I think the point here is that the
Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
Il giorno sab, 06/06/2009 alle 23.55 -0400, Martin Owens ha scritto:
Is it? I didn't think is was the port that defined the protocol but
the
nature of the messages sent over the connection. The port is a default
but not a requirement, like ssh or ftp.
For heaven's
Remco wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Martin Owensdocto...@gmail.com wrote:
No, it isn't. HTTP is by definition over port 80 - or perhaps 8080:
Is it? I didn't think is was the port that defined the protocol but the
nature of the messages sent over the connection. The port is a
Mark Fink wrote:
A short while ago, Roy Schestowitz wrote
http://boycottnovell.com/2009/06/01/banning-opposition-to-mono/ which
has some disturbing evidence of MONO supporters actively censoring
good honest and concerned people such as Neighborlee on the ubuntu
forums and today I read some
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Steve Reillysfrei...@roadrunner.com wrote:
Mark Fink wrote:
A short while ago, Roy Schestowitz wrote
http://boycottnovell.com/2009/06/01/banning-opposition-to-mono/ which
has some disturbing evidence of MONO supporters actively censoring
good honest and
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Mark Finkmpf...@gmail.com wrote:
I see you are shooting the messenger, steve.
the MONO camp has infiltrated canonical and now they are going around
censoring anything that proves MONO to be the poison that it is. this
is not a laughing matter and the fact that
I hope you get rid of MONO. only then can your reputations be restored.
I'm sorry... You want Ubuntu to drop a FOSS program because it's
developers are allegedly being problematic? I can't follow this train
of thought.
I don't think Mono is a particularly useful language myself, but
people are
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Christopher
Olahchristopherolah...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope you get rid of MONO. only then can your reputations be restored.
I'm sorry... You want Ubuntu to drop a FOSS program because it's
developers are allegedly being problematic? I can't follow this train
of
Mark Fink wrote:
MONO is a poor imitation of java, so why use MONO!?
Shows what I know I guess - I thought it was a poor imitation of .net...
I was a java evangelist for years. Too bad it never lived up to its
promise.
--
derek
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Mark Finkmpf...@gmail.com wrote:
you sound like a typical M$ appologist. do you sleep well at night?
hope they are paying you well.
Let's inject a little humour here. When making arguments, it's
vitally important that your language doesn't make me think of
there is proof posted in both articles
There are specific events pointed to. I don't think your realize the
severity of the accusations you're making (or supporting...). You are
accusing members of the FOSS community of deliberately censoring and
suppressing people. You are asking for people to
On Sunday 07 June 2009 7:48:45 pm Mark Fink wrote:
this is what the MONO developers want you to believe, but no one
really wants MONO. users still using MONO only do so because they've
been tricked by miquel co who worship m$ and will do anything to
help them destroy linux.
Hi :) Mono-based
On Sunday 07 June 2009 8:22:41 pm Mark Fink wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Christopher
So, your saying that theres not a single corporation that has ${Vital
Application} written in .net? I'm not saying that it was a good
choice, but that is the way it is and Ubuntu not supporting it
15 matches
Mail list logo
