A lot of this is non-sense. We'll see if this technological
contribution lasts.
If it is useful, then so be it. How long it lasts, and how useful it
turns out to be, in the end, depends on how many people apply that
technique, that's all.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Christopher
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 09:20 +0200, Markus Hitter wrote:
Am 10.06.2009 um 21:44 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
ke, 2009-06-10 kello 15:21 -0400, John Moser kirjoitti:
Every argument for putting Grub or the kernel on a separate partition
has been based around the idea that these files are somehow
David MENTRE a écrit :
* pycaml: a new version (0.82-10) has been uploaded in Debian which
should fix the issue with Python 2.6 in Karmic after automatic import.
I'm waiting for the automatic import.
When will it happen, by the way? According to [1]:
The syncs are done automatically on daily
On 2009-06-11 01:25:58 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
When will it happen, by the way? According to [1]:
The syncs are done automatically on daily basis until DIF date.
However, pycaml has been uploaded more that 48 hours ago in sid, and it
has still not been updated in karmic... or maybe
Felipe Figueiredo wrote:
John,
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:21 PM, John Moserjohn.r.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Luke Llukehasnon...@gmail.com wrote:
How many of these things are actually going to make it into Karmic? A
dynamically sized swap file? GRUB 2 residing
On Thursday 11 June 2009 01:19:02 (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
Apport can be set to do a dry run, and not submit the logs to Launchpad, but
stored locally.
The user only needs to get them and upload them to where s/he needs them.
I'm just not sure if this logs are on /tmp or /var/crash
$
Surely the BIOS doesn't actually have to be involved as long as the initial
boot stage can find files anywhere on the disk.
Guess what loads the inital boot stage?
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
On 2009/06/12 11:13 (GMT+0800) Christopher Chan composed:
Well, as there is no generic MBR, what MBR do you use? The Windows' one?
Mac OS X's, *BSD's?
I don't know what 'generic MBR' is either. I was referring to generic MBR
_code_, an optional feature of an openSUSE installation, and I'm
Like any other descriptive characters, any name can be penned.
At any rate, mono is useful, there's a few cases I've come across were
mono just did the trick.
Of course as a technology itself, there are pros and cons. I can
advocate for and against mono. About the opportunities that it brings
as
