Le 23/06/2013 20:21, Matt B. a écrit :
Just a quick note about the Scopes project: I wanted to say THANKS to ubuntu engineers for
giving users the ability to Uninstall the packages involved. Privacy wise I think this is a
very considerate offering. Regardless of one's view on the whole
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
J Fernyhough wrote on 22/06/13 16:06:
On 22 June 2013 15:12, Matthew Paul Thomas m...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Ubuntu, an app will request a privilege during runtime. For
example, a game might have a find my friends who already play
this game
On 13-06-24 08:07 AM, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
J Fernyhough wrote on 22/06/13 16:06:
On 22 June 2013 15:12, Matthew Paul Thomas m...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Ubuntu, an app will request a privilege during runtime. For
example, a game might have a find my friends who already play
this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Hollocher wrote on 22/06/13 16:31:
...
This is poor design. Of all the time you spend with an app, the
moment you're about to install it is the moment when you know
the least about it. So it's the moment when you're least able to
make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benjamin Kerensa wrote on 23/06/13 08:41:
On Jun 22, 2013 7:16 AM, Matthew Paul Thomas m...@canonical.com
...
Ubuntu is an operating system, not a person. Neither you nor I
get to decide priorities for Canonical engineers. But anyone is
On 13-06-23 03:41 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
Canonical Engineers have pretty much ignored the proposal of even one member
of
the Ubuntu Tech Board in regards to user privacy.
What makes you believe if Canonical ignores a former security team
member/current tech board member and the EFF
Marc Deslauriers marc.deslauri...@canonical.com wrote:
On 13-06-23 03:41 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
Canonical Engineers have pretty much ignored the proposal of even
one member of
the Ubuntu Tech Board in regards to user privacy.
What makes you believe if Canonical ignores a former security
On 13-06-23 04:06 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
The person in question has perhaps the most foremost expertise on Information
Security and Privacy in our community and perhaps in other communities as
well.
He is widely respected and I don't think its just his opinion. I think its
widely held
On 13-06-24 01:12 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Marc Deslauriers marc.deslauri...@canonical.com wrote:
On 13-06-23 03:41 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
Canonical Engineers have pretty much ignored the proposal of even
one member of
the Ubuntu Tech Board in regards to user privacy.
What makes
Hi list,
Introduction
---
In light of the recent scandal regarding the NSA's surveillance programme
PRISM and the fact that all US Corporations or Non-US Corporations with
facilities within the US are vulnerable to Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Court (FISC) orders under the
What is the difference between this company and duck duck go, or what would
be the benefit of this over, say, have such measures implemented
client-side?
[]s
Alexandre Strube
Sent from my touchpad
Em 24/06/2013 19:56, Alexander Hanff a.ha...@think-privacy.com escreveu:
Hi list,
** **
DuckDuckGo are a US owned and based company, that means they can be
compelled under US law to monitor their users. Even though DuckDuckGo state
they do not log any information and they also use HTTPS by default, it does
not protect them from being compelled to monitor their users under FISAAA,
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Alexander Hanff
a.ha...@think-privacy.com wrote:
After launching NoDPI.org and successfully chasing Phorm out of the UK and
EU, I took up a position at Privacy International, where I headed up their
Digital Privacy portfolio for 3 years.
I'll just leave this
I'll just leave this here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/06/new-leaks-british-intels-direct-from-fiber-taps-worse-than-the-us/
GCHQ are UK Intelligence service and have zero jurisdiction in the
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Marc Deslauriers
marc.deslauri...@canonical.com wrote:
On 13-06-23 04:06 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
The person in question has perhaps the most foremost expertise on
Information
Security and Privacy in our community and perhaps in other communities
as
Ok. Understanding this, what is the proposal? To change the default search
page of Ubuntu on all browsers?
[]s
Alexandre Strube
Sent from my touchpad
Em 24/06/2013 21:31, Alexander Hanff a.ha...@think-privacy.com escreveu:
I'll just leave this here:
Ubuntu does not have a default search engine although the browsers it ships
do. If your interested in getting the default search engine changed in one
of the browsers available in Ubuntu that kind of a push would have to occur
upstream.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Alexander Hanff
On 24 June 2013 21:17, Benjamin Kerensa bkere...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Ubuntu does not have a default search engine although the browsers it ships
do. If your interested in getting the default search engine changed in one
of the browsers available in Ubuntu that kind of a push would have to occur
Why would it have to occur upstream? There is nothing that I can see which
would prevent Ubuntu from doing a custom build of Firefox to include a
different default - isn't Ubuntu Firefox already branched from the official
Mozilla tree due to licensing iirc (been a while but I think this certainly
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Alexander Hanff
a.ha...@think-privacy.comwrote:
Why would it have to occur upstream?
It wouldn't necessarily but making such a change would create a delta that
Ubuntu would carry. I really cannot see Ubuntu changing a default search
engine provider when it has
On 13-06-24 03:58 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Marc Deslauriers
marc.deslauri...@canonical.com mailto:marc.deslauri...@canonical.com
wrote:
On 13-06-23 04:06 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
The person in question has perhaps the most foremost expertise
Benjamin Kerensa [2013-06-24 13:17 -0700]:
Ubuntu does not have a default search engine although the browsers it ships
do. If your interested in getting the default search engine changed in one
of the browsers available in Ubuntu that kind of a push would have to occur
upstream.
For the
Correct and I explained this to the OP when they mailed me off list.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Benjamin Kerensa [2013-06-24 13:17 -0700]:
Ubuntu does not have a default search engine although the browsers it ships
do. If your interested in
23 matches
Mail list logo
