MS promises to not sue over Mono

2009-07-06 Thread Christopher Olah
Greetings all! Given that there has been some turbulence on this risk over Mono (namely the threat of patents and alleged censorship), I think it's worth drawing attention to this post: The ECMA C# and CLI Standards by Peter Galli

Re: My Suggestions on ISSUE, MOTD, lsb-base-logging.sh

2009-06-13 Thread Christopher Olah
I got halfway through a project that would solve broadly the same problems as your /etc/issue proposal. It faltered when Launchpad kept attaching the blueprint to Drupal and the merge proposal didn't go anywhere. The would-be blueprint is still available[1], the bug in Launchpad has been

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-09 Thread Christopher Olah
Ubuntu is a centralised entity. No external person can control e.g. why we have a custom search in the home page of firefox by default. People who can't tell the difference will keep using a different google, but there is not even way to get some discussion around this (I tried in the past).

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-07 Thread Christopher Olah
I hope you get rid of MONO. only then can your reputations be restored. I'm sorry... You want Ubuntu to drop a FOSS program because it's developers are allegedly being problematic? I can't follow this train of thought. I don't think Mono is a particularly useful language myself, but people are

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-07 Thread Christopher Olah
there is proof posted in both articles There are specific events pointed to. I don't think your realize the severity of the accusations you're making (or supporting...). You are accusing members of the FOSS community of deliberately censoring and suppressing people. You are asking for people to