being loaded. It looks like
> timesyncd isn't being loaded because of a dependency on systemd.
What's the output of "sudo dpkg --configure -a"? (This may fix it and
return success, or it may return a bunch of errors. In the latter case
the output will likely be interesting.)
rsion in Ubuntu 22.10 is
2.3.11-2). Where did you get it from? The package is clearly broken,
but that isn't an Ubuntu problem - perhaps you should reinstall the
working version from Ubuntu.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss
gt; $ wget -O main.cxx
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/austin-clifton/cryptopp-chacha-asm-test/main/src/main.cpp
This works fine for me on 20.04; perhaps the relevant DigiCert CA is
disabled on your system. Try "sudo dpkg-reconfigure ca-certificates"
and make s
d look in debian/rules. (dpkg-buildpackage calls
debian/rules with various arguments to build binary packages from a
source package.)
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify s
iewer
specifically asks for them, and they wouldn't be used anyway, although
of course you should have test-built your fix and confirmed that it
actually works.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discus
ease
file a bug on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ddeb-retriever/+filebug to
remind us to look into it?
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
ch as apt that will deal with
resolving dependencies and fetching the correct version of the package
for you.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
esn't matter for the purposes of my reply.
> > On Jan 25, 2021, at 6:51 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:21:01PM -0800, Alex Chen wrote:
> >> I am trying to create a Debian package, i.e. a .deb file, that can
> >> install software in Ubuntu. I
u give it (note that the "./" is important so that apt
knows that you're talking about a file name rather than a package name):
sudo apt install ./test-package_1.0.0_amd64.deb
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mail
nmodified from Debian, and it looks as
though Debian fixed this a little while back:
https://salsa.debian.org/cfengine-team/cfengine3/-/commit/12c7780fd375b8651631afd179e45b67d1a8b8a6
So this is already fixed for the upcoming Ubuntu 20.10.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson (he/him)
d Launchpad shares cloud infrastructure, but Launchpad
doesn't operate autopkgtest as such.)
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubu
> These are all less than 24 hours old (the builds, the ghc package is older);
> I didn't find any older ones but I didn't check every entry.
This was a Launchpad infrastructure issue; exact cause not completely
clear but it looks like it was a networking problem in one of our
data
to do that in practice; it meant that if you
were intentionally diverging from one part of the prescribed default
system in such a way that required removing a lower metapackage, you
ended up removing all the upper metapackages as well, and that ended up
being rather a hassle.
--
Colin Watson (
ese ?
>
> Should I file a feature-request somewhere, or is this
> mailing list the only channel for that ?
You can file bug reports (which include feature requests) for that
application using "ubuntu-bug update-manager".
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjw
Launchpad.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 09:13:48PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 12:54:07PM -0400, Kinder wrote:
> > How do I contribute to the ubuntu PT-BR translation? preferably the command
> > "man"?
>
> Speaking as the upstream maintainer of man, the
ole distribution in one place. It usually doesn't
result in translations being shared with other distributions.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubs
e /ubuntu, not
/debian, so https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eigen3.
(https://launchpad.net/debian exists mainly as a convenience and as a
by-product of the way we sync changes from Debian; it's not part of
Debian's development workflow.)
The simplest thing would be to run "ubuntu-bug eigen3"
long as they meet the criteria for feature
freeze (which it sounds like this would, as long as it doesn't come with
other changes); it just has to be something that an Ubuntu developer
does manually rather than something that will happen without human
intervention.
"buff/cache" in top(1) or free(1) output is, and
what you've described so far sounds like normal behaviour to me.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings o
set to the unversioned level would be made,
particularly given GRUB's rather slow and unpredictable release cycle
and the widespread practice of backporting features by distribution
maintainers.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discus
e?
Separating out descriptions was in fact done later: it saves a fair
chunk of disk space if you're using multiarch, in which you have (e.g.)
both amd64 and i386 Packages files, but the descriptions are large and
mostly shared between them.
--
Colin Watson [c
an.
Given that this is (as far as I can tell) supposed to depend on the
locale, there should be no need to play off different groups of people
against each other like this.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
.18.04.1/+changelog
This is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/655917.
I've fixed it in 19.04 and above, but the fix hasn't (yet?) been
backported to 18.04.
The bug is purely in update-manager, and doesn't have any bearing on the
safety of the upgrade.
--
Colin Watson
stalling Ubuntu on those problematic UEFIs
> possible for unexperienced users again.
Upgrading stable releases to 2.04 is extremely unlikely, but the Ubuntu
grub2 maintainers can and do cherry-pick individual fixes instead. I
suggest filing a bug against the Ubuntu grub2 pac
ages to this list to
avoid being responsible for too much noise sent to Debian maintainers
for packages that they didn't prepare. However, in this case our
version of debianutils is an unmodified copy of the one in Debian, and
it would be very much better for this sort of change not to
sed, but probably used enough to justify keeping it around.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
t up to date, which
apt doesn't do by default. You can use "dselect update" in place of
"apt update" to update the available file as well as doing the other
index-update tasks.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-d
2 has never been in Ubuntu. But in any case x32 is an entirely
different ABI, which is unrelated to the ISA baseline selected for i386.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify setti
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 02:33:08PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Colin Watson <cjwat...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > IIRC Steam is also relevant, and I guess that would involve talking to
> > Valve?
>
> I think our users would be better served
t
may well involve building some more biarch libraries along the way, but
it would give us an exit strategy that doesn't involve dropping things
like Wine.
IIRC Steam is also relevant, and I guess that would involve talking to
Valve?
--
Colin Watson [c
unstable as well, so it would be
best to report it there first and then it can trickle down. (A minor
problem like this wouldn't meet the criteria for stable updates, but it
could be fixed for later releases.)
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
-
/bionic/extlinux, while
> all belongs to the same upstream source.
This is routine when only some of the binaries are actually used for
main-like purposes. (syslinux is used for Ubuntu ISO images when
booting in BIOS mode.)
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubunt
buntu One is login.ubuntu.com, providing account
management and single sign-on to a number of sites. It has basically no
bearing on cross-distribution installation/upgrade.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-deve
version of debmirror you have installed
* the full contents of the debmirror wrapper script you're running
(editing out any secrets if necessary, but there probably aren't any)
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
HE
> GAIN?
It will no doubt depend on the benchmark, and rather than cherry-picking
a single one it's likely more interesting to look at either a wide range
of benchmarks, or at the specific application in question.
Counterpoint, which also links to much more data:
https://lwn.net/Article
pretty weird when anyone who isn't, say, my
bank manager or something refers to me using a title. You don't seem to
do that for other people in general, so I assume you're trying to make
some kind of point, but I'm afraid it escapes me.)
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@u
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 03:38:20AM +0100, Xen wrote:
> Colin Watson schreef op 09-12-2017 13:51:
> > Even as somebody generally very sympathetic to the needs of
> > localisation, I've got this wrong because Python 2 had just too many
> > ways to make mistakes in t
the new names (which
have existed for some years, so it should be an easy change to make).
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 12:47:28PM +0100, Xen wrote:
> Colin Watson schreef op 09-12-2017 0:24:
> > there are good reasons behind many of the changes in Python 3
>
> You know, an appeal to "good reasons" is really a blanket statement that
> betrays the absence of any g
the
skeleton of a plan. I feel quite safe in saying that for most Python
programs it would be a great deal easier than this.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify set
e(). You
should normally call this before calling bindtextdomain() and
textdomain():
setlocale(LC_ALL, "");
(The gettext manual does cover this, but possibly you were looking at
some different bit of it.)
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com
ot;artful" flavor of ubuntu.
I've just checked, and aptitude doesn't appear to be linked with
libicu56 in artful. Exactly what command are you running that shows
that this linkage exists?
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mai
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 01:36:46PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> No thanks - I already have fixes for both the powerpc and CPC cases
> working their way through the deployment pipeline.
... and these are now fixed on production.
--
Colin Watson
builds? A priviledged lxd container alone is not enough
> there.
No thanks - I already have fixes for both the powerpc and CPC cases
working their way through the deployment pipeline.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-disc
e it able to handle using the same
extension for both.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
(perhaps not fatal, but not necessarily
trivial) associated with having more than one potential importer, not to
mention the duplicated effort.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify sett
upstream of us by Debian a little while back:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/770159
I believe you're supposed to use pkg-config instead nowadays.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ub
hone, but
potentially interesting on e.g. a multi-user tablet and would have been
pretty important if click packages had ever made it to the desktop in a
big way.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-
it is in 2.8.18, although it should be in 2.9.4
(an unstable-series release). It might be worth asking upstream whether
it can be fixed in the 2.8 series.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
-changes lists, only changes
that are explicitly uploaded to Ubuntu. While it's true that a small
number of people might be interested, it would be extremely noisy and
we've generally felt that it isn't worth the noise.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@u
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 01:45:51PM +0900, kanbe kota wrote:
> It seems http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs is down now.
Yes, it suffered a catastrophic disk failure. Our sysadmins are working
on restoring service.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.
p from trusty without trusty-updates, which
corresponds to 14.04(.0). You can then apply updates on top of that,
which will get you to whatever is latest (not necessarily the latest
point release, but rather rolling stable updates). You can't get to a
specific point
sion.d/99upstart.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
ct the udev database for
information about a particular device. (There may be some better way.)
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
tml
I agree that this seems unlikely to pose a problem. I've synced it.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/lis
e actual package name with "dpkg -S".)
The information that Gareth provided indicated that they already had
mysql-server-core-5.5-dbgsym installed, so perhaps this problem is
entirely explained by the NT_STAPSDT bit above.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
re going to enable ddeb repositories, you need to enable a set of
them that matches the ordinary binary repositories you're using.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify setti
://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=329994). I'd like to
see everything collected in /boot, indeed, but somebody is going to need
to go through base-installer and kernel packaging revision history in
some detail to work out all of the ramifications.
--
Colin Watson
.
There's support for this, but it's disabled by default, I think for
historical compatibility of some kind. Preseeding
base-installer/kernel/linux/link_in_boot=true should enable it, though.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing
to
the point of selecting a boot loader.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
libsmbclient)
endif(SAMBA_INCLUDE_DIR AND SAMBA_LIBRARIES)
mark_as_advanced(SAMBA_INCLUDE_DIR SAMBA_LIBRARIES)
## end samba confiuration
I suspect this would work fine if it did something based on cmake's
pkg-config support instead.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat
legs?
Enhances would probably be a marginally better field to use, but since
it's informational it doesn't really matter that much.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify
packages are on-screen keyboard packages
specific to the Unity 8 desktop and are probably not installed on your
system.
The bug was formerly marked as affecting gtk+2.0, but was changed to
just Ubuntu without an explanation of why in the accompanying comment
#38. I've reverted that change.
--
Colin
in gcc, or are there platforms where +x is required ?
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/40587/why-are-shared-libraries-executable
reports it as being necessary on HP-UX. It's indeed not needed on Linux
except for the odd special case, though.
--
Colin Watson
from
that, once the kernel is booted, the existing 64-bit userspace should
work fine.
I posted a list of what I think we need to do here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/102/comments/86
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu
capabilities have slightly better
take-up in userspace than the very diffuse ones, although even then
there tend to be obstacles such as not quite all filesystems supporting
them, so in practice everyone ends up having to cope with both methods
of escalating privileges anyway.
--
Colin Watson
are selected at the first screen.
Does anyone have any idea how to:
1.) Correct this issue (ideal)
Do you have crash logs?
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings
here, although it looks as
though the new protocol may be in a better state.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skype_protocol appears to have some
details on this.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss
it probably doesn't need any particular system-specific
information) you could use this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+filebug?no-redirect
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 05:04:18PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
At this point there is a pretty good chance that I'll be able to get
arm64 GHC bootstrapped in the archive in time for 14.04.
$ rmadison -s trusty ghc
ghc | 7.6.3-9 | trusty/universe | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, powerpc
much; it still leaves us bootstrapping from
scratch.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 05:18:16PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
The best information I can find is in
https://ghcarm.wordpress.com/2014/01/18/unregisterised-ghc-head-build-for-arm64-platform/,
which does suggest that there might be some hope, but it's not at all
clear whether GHC will get beyond
know.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 04:55:08PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Il Mercoledì 5 Marzo 2014 17:47, Colin Watson cjwat...@ubuntu.com ha
scritto:
I spent considerable time a while back trying to bootstrap ghc on
ppc64el and I'm afraid I got nowhere. Realistically, in the absence
).
What's the purpose of having those packages loose on the disk instead of
installing them and have them in compressed squashfs file?
They're installed conditionally depending on exactly what the installer
needs to do.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com
to iterate quickly on
deep build stacks and suchlike.
I'd like us to do pdiffs, but there's a bit of a shortage of
implementation time in the Launchpad team.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss
to be applicable now.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
in Launchpad!
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
.
Do you have any particular policy about LTS and/or new packages?
No; new packages that don't have a problem such as the above are
imported automatically.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss
results.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
allocated and
can never be removed, although of course we can stop using them.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman
ImportError: No module named schroot.executor
Good question. I've been entirely unable to find this. Adam, can you
clarify where this module comes from?
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss
people to use
the ubuntu-bug tool. There's documentation buried in ReportingBugs for
the rare cases where ubuntu-bug can't be used for whatever reason, but
if it's at all possible for you to use ubuntu-bug which attaches more
information for us, please do.
--
Colin Watson
.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
. I suggest trying
it first on a non-production system. :-)
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
in Debian, even though there'll be some propagation time.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
page which documents POSIX guarantees rather
than your actual system.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo
-PACKAGE-NAME' shows you the
source package name.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
feature_test_macros(7) (or ftm(7) for
short).
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
it's possible that you could have misconfigured
/etc/lsb-release such that the lsb_release command fails with an error.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings
of security support for nearly four years! You should
upgrade to something very much newer at the earliest opportunity.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings
or directory
[...]
This is normal since we have no proc/cpuinfo ... how can I overrule
this check on cpuinfo?
Is there any reason not to bind-mount /proc into your chroot? We don't
support running very much without /proc in place, and certainly not
installing packages in general.
Cheers,
--
Colin
pragmatic about how they
approach problems, and they don't necessarily have the luxury of going
in all guns blazing all the time.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings
reliably without having to
restart applications, and allows us to dispatch DNS queries on different
links depending on the domain (consider VPNs).
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
to maintain.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:04:47PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
Note that you need to explicitly specify /usr/bin/time to prevent the
shell builtin time command from being used, which is more limited.
Or 'command time'.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com
upstream).
Since I'm about to be diving head-first into release chaos, I strongly
encourage anyone who can to try to figure out a fix that doesn't cause
connection to the other sites we just fixed to regress!
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel
?
Yes, see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OneiricOcelot/ReleaseNotes#GCC_4.6_Toolchain
... but not compared to precise a few days ago, as Christoph said. As
far as I know, --as-needed has been in place for the lifetime of
precise.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com
; then
-echo submenu \Previous Linux versions\ {
-in_submenu=:
- fi
done
-
-if $in_submenu; then
- echo }
-fi
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo