On 25/01/2010 18:02, Vishnoo wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 19:03 +0200, Amahdy wrote:
Here is the middle of thing, have the splash splitted out into two
parts, the upper is the graphical splash and the lower part is the
traditional text-boot with [green(OK)] or [red(fail)]
Even maybe with
On 03/11/2009 13:14, Ioannis Vranos wrote:
The page http://www.ubuntu.com/products/whatisubuntu/910features
mentions
Create professional documents, spreadsheets and presentations with
OpenOffice.org 3.0.
However the included OpenOffice.org version is 3.1.1. Where should I
report this
Nathan Dorfman wrote:
You're right, I wouldn't expect my mom to be able to RTFM and figure
out how to, say, recover a corrupt grub installation or set up LVM.
Similarly, I wouldn't expect her to be able to recover a corrupted
registry on a Windows box without a lot of help.
I agree
Conrad Knauer wrote:
All documentation is useless to beginners
??? And have you visited the forums?
So this is actually the only good and valid point in this, otherwise
exaggerated, rant.
I'm currently reviewing the download process on Ubuntu.com and been
looking into various
As previously mentioned by David Siegel, we have created the list of 100
small usability bugs that should be fixed for Karmic:
https://edge.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/karmic
We have split them into milestones that help organize the process and
assign responsibilities.
We've had over 1000
Evan wrote:
In the Intrepid cycle, there was something going on where it would add
a last good boot option to grub instead of all the old kernels in
order to keep the list cleaner and shorter. It was dropped quite close
to release because of some unfixed bugs, and seems to have
Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
Hi all,
I recall that ctrl+alt+backspace was disabled because it can be hit
accidentally. A similar thing happened to me; I experienced an unwanted
reboot and it's not so pleasant, even if I didn't loose any work.
...
Vincenzo
This is a very valid point. We
Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 22:25 +0100, Ernst Persson wrote:
I saw Scott removing animation from gnome login. What's the reason for
that? I don't see any motivation or reference to a bugreport.
There's a reference to an upstream bug report in the patch itself.
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mat Tomaszewski wrote on 16/03/09 10:02:
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
...
and it's not what OS X does.
OS X shows 0 signal icon for both no signal and disconnected. Not
sure what I've missed
Andrew Barbaccia wrote:
The challenge that we're facing is:
- we have at least 3 types of network connections that should be
represented by the appropriate icon:
1. Wireless
2. Wired
3. 3G
Each of these has potentially 4 different states:
- card present,
(``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
Olá Mat e a todos.
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 14:31:59 Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
- why not show separate icons for all connection types in the panel?
because gnome, kde, freedesktop all want to reduce the number of stuff on the
notification bar
(``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
Olá Matthew e a todos.
On Thursday 12 March 2009 09:54:05 Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
The Design team has just discussed this and we agree it's confusing. The
two-monitors icon sucked, but our first try at a replacement wasn't so
hot. :-) We will have another
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mat Tomaszewski wrote on 07/03/09 13:17:
Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
I totally agree that it's confusing
Is it confusing just because it's different to what you've been used
to? I know it's
Martin Pitt wrote:
Mat Tomaszewski [2009-03-16 10:02 +]:
OS X shows 0 signal icon for both no signal and disconnected. Not sure
what I've missed?
Even if that is really so, I really don't think that we ought to copy
such confusions from OS X,
Absolutely, hence the change
(``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
Olá Mat e a todos.
On Monday 16 March 2009 10:58:55 Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
That's an interesting feedback, thanks. However, I would not treat Linux
Class students as representative for the population of all potential
Ubuntu users :)
Most of them
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:45:59 + Mat Tomaszewski
mat.tomaszew...@canonical.com wrote:
I hope by saying *we* you mean *you*, or maybe other community members
have already chosen their representative to speak for them? :)
Even with the smiley I think
Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
I totally agree that it's confusing
Is it confusing just because it's different to what you've been used to?
I know it's not a justification, but OSX have been using exactly the
same metaphor for many years now and it seems to be working out very well.
There was a
Max Bowsher wrote:
Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
I totally agree that it's confusing
Is it confusing just because it's different to what you've been used to?
I know it's not a justification, but OSX have been using exactly the
same metaphor for many
Alexander Sack wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 11:17:32AM +, Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
I totally agree that it's confusing
Is it confusing just because it's different to what you've been used to?
I know it's not a justification, but OSX have been
Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
quote from the blog:
A couple of people have said that the menu looks “sparse” or “bare”
but I think it sets the right direction and we’ll be continuing with
this approach as we touch other parts of the system.
OMG: he wants to remove icons from everywere
I'm
Martin Soto wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 11:29 +, Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
quote from the blog:
A couple of people have said that the menu looks “sparse” or “bare”
...
I've got my part in the decision to remove the icons from the fusa
applet
21 matches
Mail list logo
