Re: Unresolved tomcat9 issue

Hi, On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 06:17:17PM +0100, Troels Arvin wrote: > In https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/2047933 I have > raised the issue and also proposed a fix, but nothing seems to happen. Thank you for volunteering to fix this in Ubuntu! I see that you were already

Re: PAM module ordering with pam-auth-update

Hi Philip, On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 05:13:41PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: > Looking at the Perl, it doesn't seem like that difficult a change to make. > > Is it worth filing a bug, and how likely is this to be fixed? Thank you for the suggestion. This doesn't sound like something we'd

Re: Choice of the openssl version for 23.10 and 24.04

On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 10:28:02AM +0100, Adrien Nader wrote: > We talked about creating a new "openssl" package that is whatever the > most recent version is (in universe, and probably with no ESM-guarantee > attached somehow). This might need a bit of fiddling with packaging > though and in any

Re: Open-SSH server

[dropping Debian Cc as Debian isn't involved in security updates to Ubuntu] On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 11:54:24AM +, Matthew Wilson wrote: > Do you have an update as to when the repository for Ubuntu 22.04.2 > package Open-SSH will be upgraded from 8.9 to 9.3 to patch the > security issues as it

Re: Update python3-blinker

Hi, On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:26:48PM +, Jay Sridharan wrote: > The latest version of Flask now requires blinker >= 1.6.2, but the apt > repo python3-blinker is still on 1.4. Given that blinker 1.4 is almost > 8 years old now, I think perhaps the python3-blinker package can be > updated? It

Re: Special One-Time SRU Handling request for torbrowser-launcher

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 12:30:04PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > Here's the minimal patch for Focal, with thanks to the respective > upstream authors: Sorry, I think I might have missed the change that drops language from the composition of tarball_filename when I generated this

Re: Special One-Time SRU Handling request for torbrowser-launcher

On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 04:11:23PM -0400, Thomas Ward wrote: > To cherry pick this would require extensive reverse engineering of the code > to figure out which pieces apply to the *older* versions of > torbrowser-launcher.  Unfortunately, since there are no *bugfix* releases of >

Re: Special One-Time SRU Handling request for torbrowser-launcher

Hi Thomas, Thank you for caring for this package in Ubuntu! I'm not sure I follow why this is difficult to fix by cherry-picking fixes. It seems to me that there are two bugs mentioned - one which is a two line fix, and one which refers to upstream URLs changing, which presumably is a change in

Re: Icons on desktop

On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 10:18:19AM -0800, Coburn Ingram wrote: > Please bring back the desktop icons switch. On 22.04, I just disabled the Desktop Icons NG extension using the GUI. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Re: Update for openssl? (CVE-2023-0286)

That page shows that the package has already been updated. Not to 1.1.1t though. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/FAQ#Versions for the reason. On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 06:35:15PM +0100, Frank Heimes wrote: > Hi Philipp, > I recommend having a look at the Ubuntu CVE Tracker, which shows

Re: Bind 9.16.1 crash on Ubuntu

Hi Ben, On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 11:56:48PM +, Ben Bridges wrote: > Unfortunately, when it comes to BIND, it leaves the users in a bit of a > precarious position. If you run the bind9 package, you incur the ire of ISC > and the members of the BIND users forum (who chastise you for "running

Re: Bind 9.16.1 crash on Ubuntu

Hi, On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 05:22:34PM +, Ben Bridges wrote: > This is bind9 1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.11 running on Ubuntu 20.04.5 LTS (fully > patched). Has this issue been seen before? If so, has it been fixed, or is > it being fixed? Is this the right forum for this posting? This is the

Re: Updated parameter

Hi Dan, On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 08:09:40PM +, Dan Moore wrote: > I don't think a server OS should suspend when closing the laptop lid.   > I'd like /etc/systemd/logind.conf to have HandleLidSwitch=ignore in the > Ubuntu Server installation media.   Unfortunately this is not trivial to

Re: Tomcat9 - Ubuntu 20.04 x64

Hi, On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 04:00:22PM +, Brad Turnbough wrote: > Ran a nessus scan against the box and am being told that verion 9.0.31 is > vulnerable to a DoS attack and that I need to upgrade to >=9.0.36. Problem > is, that version isn't available in the Ubuntu repos. > > Can someone

Re: Podman update?

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 11:40:21PM +, Christian Bourque wrote: > Are there any plans to update the Podman package to the latest release > since it's now an official package of Ubuntu 22.04? Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates for our policies on bumping major versions in a

Re: python3 cryptography package unavailable

On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 09:42:54AM +, Mathew Subin wrote: > The following dependency is not working / available > > https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy/python3-cryptography > > > * python3-cffi-backend-api-max (>= 9729) > Package not available > > * python3-cffi-backend-api-min (<=

Re: freecad packages for Ubuntu

Hi, [cutting out the Cc list since I don't know if they want this traffic] FreeCAD 0.20.1 is available as a stable snap, and 0.21-g2b5452d1 is available in edge. These are published officially by upstream. You can install with: "sudo snap install freecad" ...and then you'll have 0.20.1

Re: Call for votes: Developer Membership Board restaffing

On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:51:52PM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > If you happen to activate the "wrong" email you'll just see: > > ``` > Email address successfully activated. > ``` > > But if you activate the right one (just as Robie said, usually the > @ubuntu.com one) you'd in the Web UI

Re: Ubuntu LTS20.04 - wireguard package

On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 09:25:44AM +0100, Filip Menke wrote: > Is there a reason why the wireguard package is outdated and no updates are > available through the standard update process(apt-get update / upgrade)? Updates to packages in stable releases in Ubuntu are only made under special

Re: package docker.io is broken

This has previously been discussed here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker.io/+bug/1939106 Hope that helps, Robie signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Re: Clang 10 patch for function multiversioning

Hi Jeff, On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:31:27PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Would you mind picking up this patch for Clang 10 on Ubuntu 18? > > * https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0ed613612c5d Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure. There are QA related

Re: autoinstall late-commands

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 09:23:23AM -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: > What is wrong with the two lines ??? Especially that we dont even get to > to the autoinstall and break in "late-commands"... It kicks out autoinstall > completely. Are you sure that's valid YAML? If in doubt, I suggest you quote as

Re: Ubuntu 18.04 and "Bad arg length for Socket::inet_ntoa" when using IPv6

On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 02:19:13PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Leaving IPv6 broken in 2018 or 2020 means there's a broken policy in > place, if that's the case. I think we have a misunderstanding here. If IPv6 is broken in Ubuntu, then we'd like to know about it, and I'm sure Ubuntu

Re: Ubuntu 18.04 and "Bad arg length for Socket::inet_ntoa" when using IPv6

Hi Jeff, On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 01:27:58PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 12:13 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > Would someone have a look at > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libhttp-daemon-perl/+bug/1904907 > > when time is available. > > > > The issue causes

Re: Should one be able to install with only release + -security enabled?

Hi Nish! On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 08:57:55AM -0600, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > However, I am finding a few package updates (in Bionic in my case, > but I think Focal may also have this problem) that only have fixes in the > -updates pocket. This prevents installation from succeeding with

Re: Upstream fonts-3270

Hi, On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:35:16PM +0100, Ricardo Bánffy wrote: > Is it still updatable or does that break a policy? The policy is documented here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates Hope that helps, Robie signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: Squid installation error on Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS

Hi Leroy, On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 08:08:49PM +, Leroy Tennison wrote: > apt-get upgrade (after apt-get update) reports: > > Setting up squid (3.5.12-1ubuntu7.10) ... > stat: cannot stat '7000': No such file or directory > chown: cannot access '7000': No such file or directory > dpkg: error

Re: Ubuntu Daily MD5 Check

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 04:58:54PM +, Newmont wrote: > I have been testing live daily, everyday, on a USB drive for years. About a > month or so ago, I noticed a fsck MD5 checksum being done on every boot up, > checking each package on the USB drive and making the bootup extremely slow > (I

Re: Audacity on Mint XFCE 19.3 - bug

Hi, On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 11:56:00AM +0100, Richard wrote: > Audacity doesn't load on the above OS. Not sure how to post a bug report. This should go to Mint community support channels in the first instance. Alternatively if you can provide steps to reproduce and confirm they still reproduce

Re: Query regarding OpenSSL 1.0.2 support for ubuntu 16.04

Hi Poonam, On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 03:33:42PM +0530, Poonam Maywad wrote: > Would it be possible to give an estimate or timeline for the support of > openssl 1.0.2 on ubuntu 16.04? Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases for details of support time periods and end of life dates. Hope that

Re: aqBanking 5.8.1 - when will it be available on ubuntu LTS 16 and 18

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 03:01:17PM +0200, Benjamin Brunner wrote: > we would like to know if, by any chance, the latest version of aqBanking - > 5.8.1 (released 7 days ago) will be forged and maintained for ubuntu LTS 16 > and 18 any time soon? Please see

Re: Collectd 5.8 on bionic

On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 08:59:40PM +0530, Shibashish wrote: > Is there a plan to push collectd 5.8 on bionic? The package is not on the > collectd ci host either (https://pkg.ci.collectd.org/deb/dists/). For Ubuntu, please start by reading https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates. I don't see

Re: sqlite3 FTS5 on ubuntu xenial

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:23:29PM +0200, Jonas Kvinge wrote: > Is it possible that you can enable FTS5 for sqlite3 on ubuntu xenial. > I noticed that all other (newer) ubuntu releases has it enabled, but > FTS5 is actually available as of version 3.9 and Xenial got 3.11 > You simply add

Re: Bless hex editor

On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 11:30:59PM -0400, Yeshayohu Zirkind wrote: > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 8:46 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 06:25:14PM -0400, Thomas Ward wrote: > > > That said, I would open a bug in Debian indicating that it is an > > >

Re: Bless hex editor

On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 06:25:14PM -0400, Thomas Ward wrote: > That said, I would open a bug in Debian indicating that it is an > extremely out of date, possibly orphaned package. That bug already exists: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914217 So it looks like this just needs

Re: bugs in php-xajax with PHP7

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 08:52:59PM -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote: > When I get some time, I'll go through PHP files and post a unified > diff, but I'm pretty busy, so it may be a while. This must be fixed, > though, or php-xajax is unusable as-is with PHP7. Thank you for offering a patch! Please

Re: Apply Bash 4.4.20 to fix cpu spinning on built-in wait

Hi Wiebe, On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 04:17:11PM +0200, Wiebe Cazemier wrote: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1822776 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better, and for bringing attention to the bug here. I responded in the bug. I hope

Re: apache2 package and continued Certbot compatibility

Hi, Thank you for getting in touch. I'm not sure that our test infrastructure currently allows for emails to be sent to third parties on failure, but in any case I'm sure you don't want to be spammed by test failures a majority of which won't be certbot related. One thing I suggest you can do

Re: how sudo handles $HOME

On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 01:12:56PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > in Ubuntu, sudo retains the calling user's $HOME > > this is different from upstream sudo as well as all other UNIXes and > even the sudo documentation we provide. Should we remove our custom > patch that adds this behavior? Does

Re: Removal of libllvm4.0 from disco/universe

Hi Simon, On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 02:02:41PM +0200, Simon Spannagel wrote: > I was wondering why libllvm4.0 (or, more specifically for me, > clang-format-4) was removed from the 19.04/disco/universe repository > while an even older version (3.8) is still available. > > What were the reasons for

Re: compatibility issue in environment-modules version 4.1.1-1

On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 08:21:29PM +0200, Josefsson-Ljungdahl wrote: > Seeing that you have attached a signature it would help if you could point > me to your public key. You can find mine at public key-servers. The > fingerprint is: 57AA BFB8 727A 2506 47CC CB90 2D23 4815 7026 0357. Look > for

Re: compatibility issue in environment-modules version 4.1.1-1

Hi, I would start by making sure a good quality bug report exists against the Ubuntu package, and if relevant, the Debian package. It would help if you could report in that bug if the problem is fixed in the latest version of the package in Debian, and which releases of Ubuntu are affected. Then

Re: biosdevname package in Universe is severely downlevel

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Imho it should be removed from the archive, and not be made available at all. As long as we are shipping it though, isn't it reasonable to allow volunteers to keep it up to date? Same for stable releases where it did ship -

Re: Right way to submit patches for Ubuntu packages

[dropping bystanders from Cc:, leaving only Dan and the list] Thank you for volunteering to help with Ubuntu! On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 08:30:06AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > Any advice for the next step in navigating > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates ?

Re: iputils-s20161105 and iputils-tracepath-s20161105 error sendto: Invalid argument

Hi Aaron, I'm not sure why you're writing this to the list here? It needs to go in the bug, which I think is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iputils/+bug/1798313. Robie signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list

Re: gnome-commander package is very, very old

Hi, On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 04:51:45PM +, kht-lists wrote: > The gnome-commander package in the bionic universe repo is version 1.4.8. > The current version of the program is 1.10.0. The version was released a few > days ago. I have compiled it on Ubuntu Mate 18.04 with no issues. How do

Re: update iputils version in bionic to iputils-20170101 or later

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 11:27:40AM -0400, Aaron Dudek wrote: > hitting this bug > https://github.com/iputils/iputils/issues/68 Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates. Fixing a bug is fine. Bumping entirely to a newer upstream release in an Ubuntu stable release may not be

Re: libnfsidmap2 libnfsidmap-dev

Hi, On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 01:19:29PM +, Michael Barkdoll wrote: > Can someone please update package libnfsidmap2 and libnfsidmap-dev to v0.26: In a stable Ubuntu release? That's not necessarily appropriate depending on any other changes involved. This all needs to be checked to minimise

Re: Reg: KDE Connect update to 1.3.2

Hi, On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 02:44:08PM +0530, Balaji Sundaram wrote: > I am using KDE connect from my kubuntu OS, and i have kde connect in my > android smart phone. I cannot access my smart phone file system from my > kubuntu OS. When i searched for solutions, i came across the official KDE >

Re: Enable kernel options CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK_USB_XDBC and USB_XHCI_DBGCAP for serial connections with kernels >= 4.16

Hi Rene, On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 11:19:52AM +0100, Rene 'Renne' Bartsch, B.Sc. Informatics wrote: > I suggest to enable USB DbC by enabling the kernel options > "CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK_USB_XDBC=Y" and "USB_XHCI_DBGCAP=Y" in Ubuntu kernels >= > 4.16. Thank you for the suggestion. The Ubuntu

Re: systemd unit file broken: reload not working

Hi Christian, On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 03:32:18PM +, Christian Schneider wrote: > Hey, > > we are using the newest Varnish package under Ubuntu 16.04. The reload does > not work because of the broken systemd unit file. See: > https://github.com/varnishcache/pkg-varnish-cache/pull/70 >

Re: SBCL : update to 1.5 : request

Hi, On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 02:52:38PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > The SBCL system in Ubuntu 18.04 is still at 1.4.5 which is 12 releases > behind the latest 1.5.0 as per the URL; http://www.sbcl.org/all-news.html > > Could you please update the package and it's associated stuff (docs and >

Re: Request for bison refresh

Hi Eric, On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 08:06:25AM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > This is a nudge about the Bison package in bionic. The NTPsec project > (which I lead) needs a warning suppression that made it into Bison > 3.0.5. Bionic presently packages 3.0.4. Upgrade please? This depends on

Re: New libmlpack

Hi, On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:22:34PM -0800, David Albrecht wrote: > How can I get the later versions of this released? Ubuntu 18.10 relaesed with mlpack 3.0.3. If you're wondering why 16.04 doesn't have this, start by reading https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates. In essence, Ubuntu

Re: Ubuntu still shipping with old version of column

I was privately[1] pointed to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1705437. I've commented on that bug and marked it Won't Fix. Please see my comment there for details. Robie [1] Please don't email me privately in response to a mailing list post unless you know me or the

Re: Ubuntu still shipping with old version of column

Hi Rene, On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 09:38:02AM +0100, Rene Hoffmann wrote: > Why is ubuntu still using such an old version of the column command in the > package bsdmainutils? I ask because it misses the feature to declare a > custom output delimiter ... Which Ubuntu release are you referring to,

Re: .deb package for Kitty Version: 0.11.3-1

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 02:26:47PM +, Keir Wayman wrote: > The email address that I sent my original email to came from inside the .deb > package (attached) so I assumed a level of sanity checking had been done. A level of sanity checking does get done automatically, but only _against the

Re: .deb package for Kitty Version: 0.11.3-1

Hi, On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 01:13:28PM +, Keir Wayman wrote: > I installed the above on my Ubuntu 18.x system. The installation deleted > more than 90 packages including the gdebi package installer, the > software-centre, ubuntu-cleaner & the usb disk creator.  It's a dangerous > thing

Re: No more dialog in `apt upgrade -y` events

Hi, On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 02:40:30PM +0800, Jesse Steele wrote: > I'm a dev who relies on updates on many machines; I write scripts to handle > them. I don't have the resources to investigate every daily build to see if > GRUB or PHP is going to ask a question that, under most circumstances,

Re: Please update gnome-twitch to 0.4.2

Hi, On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:11:51AM -0600, Jacob Killelea wrote: > The version of gnome-twitch currently shipping on 18.04 has issues that > stop it from working properly (see > https://github.com/vinszent/gnome-twitch/issues/370). The maintainer says > that the problems have been fixed and

Re: calibre version 3.31

Hi John, On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 09:41:15PM -0500, John wrote: > I wanted to install Calibre for Linux Mint The repository has version 3.21 > but the latest if version 3.31.. > Any change The newer version can be loaded in the repository? Thank you for your interest. calibre 3.31 is already

Re: update mininet packages

Hi Martin, On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 06:43:38PM +0200, Martin Brakl wrote: > I want to ask you to update mininet package for Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS x64 to > the newest stable version 2.2.2 which is already launched in Ubuntu 18 > repos. > > https://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/mininet Please start by

Re: Jansson Security Patches Break Object Keys

Hi, On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 09:28:29PM -0500, Brian C. Wiles wrote: > This functionality was broken in 2.5-2ubuntu0.1, and it was working in > 2.5-2. Looks like a regression has already been fixed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jansson/2.5-2ubuntu0.2 If you still have a regression, you

Re: An question about default opened option "-fstack-protector-strong"

Hi Shaoting, On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 07:03:28AM +, Shao, Ting wrote: > 1. I installed gcc from apt-get by default, is Ubuntu providing a > customized version of GCC? Yes. I don't think Ubuntu is unique at all amongst distributions in this regard. > 2. If answer of 1 is yes, then

Re: youtube-dl out of date.

Hi, On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 02:56:13PM -0400, Curry Thompson wrote: > 2018.06.14 and the package manager version is 2016.02.22-1. I don't know > how involved the process is to update the package manager's version, or if > updating it will even fix the problem, but I wanted to bring it your >

Re: Vim unusable in 18.04, with upstream fix available

Hi Thomas, On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 10:53:02AM +0100, Thomas Grainger wrote: > Currently vim in ubuntu 18.04 is unusable (with lint plugins like w0rp/ale > [1]), There's a path available upstream [2] I've opened an ubuntu bug [3] > but it seems to have stagnated. Thank you for filing the bug. It

Re: network-manager-openvpn 1.1.93-1ubuntu1.1 -- when will fix be applied?

Hi David, On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:03:45PM -0400, David H. Durgee wrote: > When will this fix be available in xenial-updates and applied here via > synaptic? This sounds like a feature rather than a bug. If this is correct then it probably won't be suitable for an update to Xenial. See

Re: Will there be an update for xfce4-panel in 16.04?

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 08:33:33PM +0200, . wrote: > The current version of xfce4-panel (4.12.0) in Ubuntu 16.04 is suffering > from a nasty repainting error: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/1397095 Have you tried contacting the Xubuntu community about this? See:

Re: Patch needed for conserver-server

Hi Dennis, On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 11:21:07AM +0100, Dennis Wallberg wrote: > We have been noticing alot of hanging sessions on our conserver > server, causing our remote console servers to eventually run out of > resources/sessions and we found this patch Thank you for bringing our attention to

Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

Please stop. "Lawyering" on this list is pointless and will not get us anywhere. "I think this would be compliant" and "I think this would not be compliant" is meaningless when coming from a bunch of random engineers. Give Canonical some credit. They're not going to go ahead with something that

Re: Where is the Git repo for the Ubuntu packaging branch for Dovecot package?

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:04:56PM +, Daniel Llewellyn wrote: > It looks like you want the git repo whose details are shown at > https://code.launchpad.net/~usd-import-team/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+git/dovecot Please note that this is currently an experimental git view. We're actively working

Re: Golang Package.

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 04:17:01PM +, Robie Basak wrote: > But Ubuntu does have a concept of LTS, and this by definition applies to > everything Ubuntu ships. This is the point of a distribution stable > release. I should add that we understand that some users want some specific

Re: Golang Package.

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:50:13PM +, Mike Lloyd wrote: > Gotcha. Why is the standard package is so far behind in 16.04? Golang > doesn't have a concept of LTS. But Ubuntu does have a concept of LTS, and this by definition applies to everything Ubuntu ships. This is the point of a

Re: Ubuntu and its derivatives (Lubuntu, Xubuntu etc.) should really consider adding cross-distribution installation/upgrade feature in Ubiquity

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 06:08:56PM +0200, Βασίλης Κατσαρέλιας wrote: > Can anyone please consider that? Sounds like a great idea! Are you volunteering to write and maintain this support? If not, then I feel that this should be an FAQ item. Ideas are great and we aren't short of them. What we

Re: Ubuntu Monthly Update Cadence Proposal

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:39:00PM -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote: > I see a few possible ways: > 1. > * Packages that aren't part of a set that is coupled with others > could be synced at any time > * Coupled sets of packages could be synced in a similar staggered way > as directly uploaded

Re: Ubuntu Monthly Update Cadence Proposal

How would this integrate with autosync? signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: Dependency problem

I should add that this list is also the wrong place to get user support. You'll find that more people are around to help you (with Ubuntu problems) on Ubuntu user support forums such as askubuntu.com and ubuntuforums.org. See https://community.ubuntu.com/t/finding-help/712 for a bigger list. If

Re: Dependency problem

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:14:12PM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote: > I've a Linux Mint 18.2, based on Ubuntu 16.04 (as I know). Then please seek either seek help within the Mint community, or verify and reproduce the problem in Ubuntu first and then describe your problem in terms of Ubuntu only

Re: Python2 demotion (moving from main to universe) in progress

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:51:00PM +0100, Xen wrote: > Personally I don't know *why* this needed to happen. Also from the > perspective of the python devs, I mean. Because Python 2 will be unsupported upstream and we don't have an unlimited amount of resources to maintain it in Ubuntu without

Re: iproute2

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 05:06:02PM +0200, Monique van den Berg wrote: > The patch I would like to have backported is already in upstream. > Would I still need to follow the procedure outlined in this document? > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates Yes. Whether it is upstream or not, we

Re: iproute2

Hi Monique, On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:51:26AM +0200, Monique van den Berg wrote: > I would like to have a patch backported to ubuntu 14.04 and 16.04 for a bug > in iproute2, how would I go about doing this? Our requirements and process for this is documented in

Re: need to fix 4 high vulnerability assessments about needing to update zlib 1.2.8

Hi Thomas, On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 04:54:40PM -0400, Thomas Gertin wrote: > I am getting 4 high vulnerability assessments from my Common > Vulnerabilities and Exposures-1.1 rules package. They all recommend > updating my zlib package. I have updated my zlib package and it is > up-to-date with

Re: Firefox ESR package is really needed

On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 12:27:36AM +0300, Nrbrtx wrote: > Thanks to JonathonF - he built latest Firefox ESR 52.4.0. Interested users > may download it from PPA > https://launchpad.net/~jonathonf/+archive/ubuntu/firefox-esr > . > >

Re: nvidia-304-dev

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:28:58AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Unity is discontinued, so consider to become used to another desktop > environment. Some desktop environments require 3D acceleration others > don't need 3D acceleration. I think this is quite a misleading statement in this context.

Re: Ubuntu 16.04 libapache2-mod-shib2 package outdated

Hi Toni, On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 04:44:12PM +0300, Toni Sissala wrote: > Is this package going to be updated? The current version is available for > zesty and artful. I had assumed that with an LTS version, there should at > least be backports of important packages available. This package is in

Re: Looking for Contact for OpenSSL on Trusty to be updated

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 03:31:22AM +, Eric Yuen wrote: > I am looking for a contact to reach out in regards > https://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/openssl on Trusty and having an update to > the OpenSSL package updated with CVE-2017-3733 The CVE database reports that Trusty is not affected by

Re: apache2 update for semi-critical "optionsbleed" bug

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:30:20AM -0400, Glen Willmot wrote: > Just curious on when we'll see an update on the apache2 release to > version 2.4.28 to patch against the "Optionsbleed" bug detailed by > CVE-2017-9798. Already done, but by backporting the fix (as usual for Linux distributions)

Re: systemd and openvpn

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:32:26AM +0200, Göran Hasse wrote: > They must have "forgot it". In that case, in the first instance upstream should be contacted directly with this report. Then the problem can be fixed for everyone without risking confusion to Ubuntu users by having OpenVPN behave

Re: systemd and openvpn

Hi Göran, On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 06:50:27AM +0200, Göran Hasse wrote: > PLEASE se to that the default configuration of openvpn is so that it will > restart after an exit. Do you know why the upstream OpenVPN project don't set this as default already? That'd be the first question to answer I

Re: FW: zstd package on Ubuntu LTS 16.04

Hi Yann, Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates. If you have any further questions after reading that, please feel free to ask. Robie signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or

Re: Please backport ieee-data into xenial

Hi Lukas, On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 06:37:20PM +1000, Lukas Erlacher wrote: > I have tried to figure out backporting before but have found it > impenetrable, so I would be extremely grateful if someone could take it upon > themselves to backport the newer version of the package from zesty. Thank

Re: BUG: Intel-8260 not init'd by intel-microcode=3.20170707.1~ubuntu16.04.0

Hi Yarko, Thank you for this report. Please could you file a bug against the intel-microcode package in Ubuntu so that we can track this? Use the following link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-microcode/+filebug Thanks! Robie On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 08:43:54PM -0500, Yarko

Re: open-vm-tools xenial update 10.1.0

Hi Lukas, On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 01:47:08PM +, Bodych, Lukas wrote: > anybody knows if there will be an update for the open-vm-tools in > xenial (16.04 LTS) higher then 10.1.0 in repositories soon? Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates and perhaps

Re: Request: AWN-Bandwidth-Monitor Applet for AWN

Hi Rodolfo, On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:44:24AM -0400, Rodolfo Ferreira wrote: > Please let me know if I can help developing this AWN applet in any way I > can. It looks like this was removed because nobody was maintaining the packaging: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725264

Re: 8.0.32-1ubuntu1.3~ppa2 patches not in tomcat8 8.0.32-1ubuntu1.4

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 09:48:06AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >Is there a reason that the patches present in the test tomcat8 > 8.0.32-1ubuntu1.3~ppa2 were dropped from tomcat8 8.0.32-1ubuntu1.4? Where were you getting 8.0.32-1ubuntu1.3~ppa2 from? That doesn't sound like something that would

Re: Artful: Inkscape depending old libgtkmm & libgdkmm

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 10:40:47AM +0200, Xen wrote: > Robie, can you open SVG files in the default install of Inkscape? Yes. I opened one yesterday. Or is there some specific GUI method of opening an SVG that you want me to confirm is working? signature.asc Description: PGP signature --

Re: Artful: Inkscape depending old libgtkmm & libgdkmm

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 10:42:45AM +0200, Frans van Berckel wrote: > So i think i am gonna reinstall the libgtkmm-2.4-1v5 just to find out > what goes wrong. The question is still, how is the Happened? Difficult to know. But I've not seen this kind of thing happen except through filesystem

Re: Artful: Inkscape depending old libgtkmm & libgdkmm

$ ldd /usr/bin/inkscape|grep gtkmm libgtkmm-2.4.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtkmm-2.4.so.1 (0x7fb4612ce000) $ dpkg -S /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtkmm-2.4.so.1 libgtkmm-2.4-1v5:amd64: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtkmm-2.4.so.1 $ dpkg-query -W libgtkmm-2.4-1v5:amd64

Re: Artful: Inkscape depending old libgtkmm & libgdkmm

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 08:43:03AM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > $ ls /usr/bin/inkscape |grep 'not found' Whoops! But still: $ ldd /usr/bin/inkscape |grep 'not found' $ Robie signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.

Re: Artful: Inkscape depending old libgtkmm & libgdkmm

Hi Frans, On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:48:32AM +0200, Frans van Berckel wrote: > I installed on Ubuntu Artful the Inkscape package. If I wanne start it > from the prompt, it does dependencies error's ... I'm running Artful and have no such problem: $ dpkg-query -W inkscape inkscape

  1   2   3   >