Good Morning,
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 18:36:29 -0400
Mark Fink mpf...@gmail.com wrote:
[...removed totally annoying article...]
As I'm not a MONO Fanboy myself...and sometimes boycott novell does
write good articles...but please...
Mono gives us a good way into the MS front...this could also be a
Moins,
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:38:31 +0100
Jan Claeys li...@janc.be wrote:
Op woensdag 25-03-2009 om 16:19 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Scott
James Remnant:
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 15:26 +, Max Bowsher wrote:
This assumes you buy into the SI's naming scheme and can say
things like
Moins,
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:56:00 +0200
Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
scsi0 : 3ware 9000 Storage Controller
3w-9xxx: scsi0: Found a 3ware 9000 Storage Controller at
0xd014, IRQ: 16.
3w-9xxx: scsi0: Firmware FE9X 2.04.00.005, BIOS BE9X 2.03.01.047,
Ports: 8.
Moins,
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 02:27 +, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
On 11/11/2008 Scott Kitterman wrote:
I would encourage you (and others, you certainly aren't the only one)
to hold
your temper and if you can't say something helpful, just take your
hands off
the keyboard. Being
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 09:00 +, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
If a distributor adds more goodies to the kernel, then be happy, but
that doesn't mean, that it really works...even when the distributor puts
the hardware on the list of supported hardware.
I hope this is not really the
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 02:01:26PM -0700, Mathias Gug wrote:
What are you referring to by package ?
The make a parallel with python, the gem command is similar to easy_intall.
And ezinstall is broken by design for a binary distro and for endusers.
ezinstall doesn't check if there is the
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 02:07:46PM +0100, Neil Wilson wrote:
Scott,
I'm trying to avoid the wheres and wherefores of what gem is about.
Suffice to say that Rails depends upon effective gem support, such
that the configuration of Rails can specify gem dependencies directly.
So if Ubuntu
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 03:51:35PM +0800, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Stephan Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Serious, for a normal familiy I would advise to by ready made
appliances..they are tested, and are usable (well not everytime, but
If a security flaw
Hi,
I don't want to comment this mail in particular, but regarding the
difference of SysAdmins and HomeAdmins: There is a difference of people
who are used to graphical configuration stuff which hides a lot of
important things which are important to real sysadmins.
IMHO the usecase for Ubuntu
Hi,
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:04:14 +0200
Remco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Stephan Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But what do you (not you in particular) want to do at home?
Setting up a webserver is easy...and adding a drupal or blog
software, too
Good Evening Scott, Chris and all,
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:06:21 -0400
Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 30 June 2008 10:52, Christian Desrochers wrote:
Hi all,
Our web servers have been checked recently by an external security
firm. We have been told that our web
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:18:46 +0100
Mark Shuttleworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doh. That was intended for JR. Oh well, congrats to everyone else
who's been working on the KDE4 remix :-)
Oh Homer, Oh Homer...
Mark, those two mails made my day...at least those misrouting emails
also happen to
Hi Cody,
Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
On 3/20/08, Jonathan Jesse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Good morning,
How would you suggest doing this instead? I am one of those that is combing
launchpad for bugs that have not been reported or updated for a long time.
I try to reproduce the
Hi,
Richard Mancusi wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Brian Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing this, and some other events, has made me think about is - how
are new community members supposed to know who someone is and what their
contributions to Ubuntu have been? We have a
hi Colin,
Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:55:47PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
The package is not at fault...
The fault was to upload dpkg (2008-02-11 imho) with
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistCompilerFlags this in mind.
Setting those flags is not good without a bunch
Hi Colin,
Colin Watson wrote:
Fact, rebuilding the archive won't show any build failures, but running
those rebuilt apps would have shown the evilness of this change.
Rebuilding the archive against the output of the rebuild in progress
would have shown it up very quickly; note that
Moins,
Cory K. wrote:
Soren Hansen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:00:03AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Cory's comment was a bit intemperate, but I feel your response was not
at all helpful and that it really minimized Cory's extensive
contributions to Ubuntu developmen.
hi Daniel,
Daniel Hollocher wrote:
Hey, good response.
It looks like this problem will be fixed in the future, and I see the
irony of to whom I originally responded to.
If you see the current development release of Ubuntu (named Hardy Heron)
you can see, that Ubuntu is up2date with wine.
Hi,
On Mo, 2008-01-14 at 15:18 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:51:12AM -0500, Forest Bond wrote:
Didn't we just move back to cdrtools from cdrkit? Weren't these issues
resolved, or something?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=270060
That's
Dear Colleagues,
as I wrote on http://www.sourcecode.de/content/cdrkit-vs-cdrtools I
really wonder what way we should go.
Regarding the non-freeness of cdrtools, we should concentrate on getting
the cdrkit binaries to the upstream projects.
Most of the apps I found in debian/ubuntu, which are
Hi,
On So, 2008-01-13 at 17:29 +0100, Thilo Six wrote:
Stephan Hermann wrote the following on 13.01.2008 15:17
Dear Colleagues,
as I wrote on http://www.sourcecode.de/content/cdrkit-vs-cdrtools I
really wonder what way we should go.
Regarding the non-freeness of cdrtools, we
Hi Conrad,
Am Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:12:26 -0600
schrieb Conrad Knauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hardy, being a LTS release, will have an emphasis on stability and
polish; but I was thinking for Hardy+1 that, like replacing SysVInit
in Edgy with Upstart, some new ideas to kick around might be nice.
Hi Kevin,
Am Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:55:40 -0700
schrieb Kevin Fries [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 12:03 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I think you misunderstand my point.
No I got it. And I think that that thinking is wrong and dangerous to
Linux in general, and Ubuntu in
23 matches
Mail list logo
