You'd have to have special packages for local and for system-wide.
./configure is during compile, not during installation, so you'd have to
compile twice for each package to have one that goes in ~
On Dec 20, 2007 11:24 AM, Carsten Agger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like in many packages, you can
Hi,
Jonathan Musther [2007-12-21 9:16 +1300]:
I'm new to this list, I joined it because I saw in the archive that
recently you were discussing the problem with running fsck on boot as a
'just in case' filesystem check.
We quickly discussed this at the last UDS. Most people were not in
It would be interesting to hear how people feel about having an
interruptible check on boot, versus moving the check to shutdown?
Certainly an interruptible check is an improvement, but is it still lacking
in usability?
Also, would the user have to skip the check within a timeout (something like
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:36:18AM +0800, Joel Bryan Juliano wrote:
I think PulseAudio can save every user great amount of trouble regarding
sound issues, and bad bad esd.
I hope PulseAudio get included in Hardy as default.
It already is.
--
Colin Watson
On ven, 2007-12-21 at 08:13 -0500, Evan wrote:
My personal preference would be to move it to shut-down, but an
interruptable check on boot is better than nothing. Just my two cents.
I'm not sure that moving it to shutdown is a proper solution. Think
about a laptop shuting down because its
My personal preference would be to move it to shut-down, but an
interruptable check on boot is better than nothing. Just my two cents.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
If it was moved to shutdown, I would assume that the user would be able to
skip it, or better yet they would be prompted.
I have been contacted by autofsck users who have turned off a laptop and
then closed the lid immediately (or turned off a desktop and immediately
switched off the monitor) and
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 14:09 -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote:
Can we not just check and never run (auto)fsck when on battery?
But there are definitely people who rarely or never use the laptop while
plugged in. E.g., they may charge overnight, unplug and take the laptop
on the road, replugging in the
I have been following this and I thought I would add my 2 cents worth
(1) At shutdown is good
(2) Timeout/interuptable is good
(3) BUT. The default action should be No Action
At shutdown the user is prompted that a file system check is required
When the timeout occurs
I agree entirely, the user shouldn't have to say, no, don't do it they
should have to say yes, now is a good time.
On Dec 22, 2007 10:46 AM, Chris Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been following this and I thought I would add my 2 cents worth
(1) At shutdown is good
(2)
My personal preference would be to move it to shut-down, but an
interruptable check on boot is better than nothing. Just my two cents.
Of course then there's the laptop angle.
My old POS laptop has about 3 minutes of battery life left. One day I either
need a new laptop or to pony up a
Of course then there's the laptop angle.
My old POS laptop has about 3 minutes of battery life left. One day I either
need a new laptop or to pony up a thousand for a shiny new model.
Anyways--I usually hit shutdown, unplug everything and throw it in my bag.
It would definitely run out of
Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
You'd have to have special packages for local and for system-wide.
./configure is during compile, not during installation, so you'd have
to compile twice for each package to have one that goes in ~
On Dec 20, 2007 11:24 AM, Carsten Agger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo
